You must set the ad_network_ads.txt file to be writable (check file name as well).
DMCA = Bad Law [Archive] - RonFez.net Messageboard

PDA

View Full Version : DMCA = Bad Law


alexc
04-07-2003, 08:18 AM
somebody much better summarized why it is bad...
How the DMCA Affects Us

Scholars and computer programmers are up in arms about something called the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, a law signed into existance in 1998. They're getting angry and scared because some of them have been censored and one of them has recently been put in jail in the U.S. for violating it.

As a law dealing primarily with crimes related to thought and speech, the DMCA is probably not exciting enough to be covered in the news on your living room television set any time soon. It does not appear to be a mainstream issue. This is too bad because if left unchanged, the DMCA is going to affect all of us (and our libraries) in profound and negative ways.

The DMCA gives publishers the power to prevent you from printing a page, loaning a book to your friends or in some cases, even reading it out loud. For example, if you purchase and download an electronic book from the Internet and figure out how to circumvent the reader software so that you can print it out to read in the bathroom, the DMCA makes what you have done a federal crime, and if you tell anyone how you did it, you can be looking at a fine of up to $500,000 and 5 years in prison. This has happened.

The DMCA gives publishers the power to lock books, songs, and movies up with reader, player, or viewer software, and to threaten anyone who examines the software with legal action. For example, if a computer science professor wants to give a talk to students about how some music encryption software works, he could be censored by being threatened with a lawsuit from a large recording association. This too has happened.

The DMCA affects everyone because it gives corporate publishers absolute control over what we are allowed to do with the literature and music that they publish. The DMCA allows publishers to enclose books that you purchase online and download to your computer in simple software wrappers that can force you to agree to a contract before you can access the book and prevent you from loaning the book, giving it away, printing any of it, reselling it as a used book, or even moving it to a different computer. Even if the software wrapper is easily circumvented, it is illegal to do so. All of this has happened.

The DMCA allows publishers to override the fair use doctrines that are laid out in the U.S. Constitution. Whether the DMCA will be struck down as being unconstitutional remains to be seen, but there is considerable resistance among House and Senate leaders to do anything about this law because of the large amounts of "soft money" donations coming from the music, movie, and publishing industry lobbyists.

Sheeplovr
04-07-2003, 11:00 AM
i posted about this cheech but everyone was all like "ugg me dont knwo what this means im a caveman oog ogg "

<a href=http://www.ronfez.net/messageboard/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=87&Topic=26612&RequestTimeout=50>DMCA</a>

number 333 its the way to be
<a href=http://www.Tunekies.com><img src=http://thereisnogod.faithweb.com/images/bhdance2.gif title="The Weed Of Crime Bears Bitter Fruit You Old Hag">
Im A Cuddly Teddybear
POWER AND CHAOS

TooCute
04-07-2003, 11:28 AM
At least they weren't filthy monkeys eek ack chee!!

<img src=http://thereisnogod.faithweb.com/images/toocute2.gif>
!! 2% !!<font color=white>

alexc
04-07-2003, 11:35 AM
scariest thing is that i violate the damn law everytime i play my dvd on my linux box...

Def Dave in SC
04-07-2003, 12:01 PM
ACK! Ack ACK Ack Ack!


The Montgomery County Mobster
<img src="http://members.hometown.aol.com/gpigking/myhomepage/```def.gif?mtbrand=AOL_US">
Much Love to my Homie dcpete

Its Like Having a Football Helmet Inside Your Head

TheMojoPin
04-07-2003, 03:54 PM
Wait a minute...so to read a book or listen to music or watch a movie now, I need to sign a CONTRACT?

<img src="http://members.hostedscripts.com/randomimage.cgi?user=TheMojoPin">
2% << FREE YERDADDY! >> "You can tell some lies about the good times you've had/But I've kissed your mother twice and now I'm working on your dad..."

ADF
04-07-2003, 04:30 PM
They have everything for men to enjoy
You can hang out with all the boys

It's fun to stay at the DMCA
It's fun to stay at the DMCA




<center><a href = "http://thereisnogod.faithweb.com"><img src = http://thereisnogod.faithweb.com/images/adfseasons2.gif title = "turn turn turn" width = 300 height = 100></a>
Can't we all just get a lawn?</center>

JerryTaker
04-08-2003, 07:08 AM
Holy Leaping Lanny Jesus Christ.... You people dissapoint me on <I>so</I> many levels here...

We tried to protest this at NJIT back in '98, unfortunatley, much like now, people don't care enough to do anything about it, and all we could muster was a ribbon campaign.

How about this, try reading something on paper... go online and find where your local library is and go read George Orwell's "1984" Maybe then you'll see where all this legislation we're ignoring is headed...

you all got "sheepy horned" on this one...


<IMG SRC="http://afs30.njit.edu/~gsm2321/faramir.gif">

<marquee width=300 scrollamount="5">Wet and raving, The needle keeps calling me back.. To bloody my hands forever. Carved my cure with the blade That left me in scars, Now every time I'm weak, Words scream from my arm</marquee>

TheMojoPin
04-08-2003, 10:23 AM
Hey, I can't help it...I still think the internet runs on magic...

<img src="http://members.hostedscripts.com/randomimage.cgi?user=TheMojoPin">
2% << FREE YERDADDY! >> "You can tell some lies about the good times you've had/But I've kissed your mother twice and now I'm working on your dad..."

jratt
04-08-2003, 10:32 AM
Ok this is pretty long but read it cause it is dirctly related and this is something that if it takes hold in are goverment god knows what else they could do

[quote]Firewalls set to become illegal in many American states


Legislation by the ignorant

By Arron Rouse: Friday 28 March 2003, 13:21


AN INTERESTING PIECE of news has surfaced that will have sys admins fainting in disbelief.
Eight states have put forward bills that would have a devastating effect on network security and even networks themselves if they come to pass.
The wording in the bills is dumb enough that firewalls could become illegal.
The news about the bills was brought to our attention by Edward Felten, more famous for having a go at a different Bill. The states in question are Texas, Massachusetts, South Carolina, Florida, Georgia, Alaska, Tennessee and Colorado.
The proposed legislation is intended to extend the much loathed Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

Felten is definitely used to legal issues, having presented evidence against Microsoft in the antitrust trial.
According to his news article on Freedom to Tinker, the various states bills all require the banning the use of any technology that conceals "the existence or place of origin or destination of any communication."
It doesn't take much to think that firewalls, routers, network address translators and many other pieces of standard kit all do exactly that.

Unless the bills are radically changed, the Internet could effectively become useless in those states.

The wording in the bills is almost certain to change once the correct pressure is applied but it just goes to show what happens when you leave legislators to their own devices.


----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/30003.html

Use a firewall, go to jail, and send Bill Gates too
By John Lettice
Posted: 28/03/2003 at 16:48 GMT


The (DMCA) Digital Millennium Copyright Act clearly isn't enough for some people. Massachusetts and Texas are - in curious formation - considering bills that will extend it to make firewalls (among other things) illegal.

The strange synchronicity is illustrated by a quick look at the draft of the Texas bill then comparing it with the Massachusetts one, which you'll find in RTF format at Ed Felten's Freedom to Tinker, here. The strikeouts indicate that both, for whatever reason, have decided not to repress video this time around.

The repression that remains is however impressive. Felten points to this wording:

(b) Offense defined.--Any person commits an offense if he knowingly:

(1) possesses, uses, manufactures, develops, assembles, distributes, transfers, imports into this state, licenses, leases, sells or offers, promotes or advertises for sale, use or distribution any communication device:

(i) for the commission of a theft of a communication service or to receive, intercept, disrupt, transmit, re-transmits, decrypt, acquire or facilitate the receipt, interception, disruption, transmission, re-transmission, decryption or acquisition of any communication service without the express consent or express authorization of the communication service provider; or

(ii) to conceal or to assist another to conceal from any communication service provider, or from any lawful authority, the existence or place of origin or destination of any communication

Over to Ed here, because he puts it so well:

"Your ISP is a communication service provider, so anything that concealed the origin or destination of any communication from your ISP would be illegal -- with no exceptions.

"If you send or receive your email via an encrypted connection, you're in violation, because the 'To' and 'From' lines of the emails are concealed from your ISP by encryption. (The encryption conceals the destinations of outgoing messages, and the sources of incoming messages.)

"Worse yet, Network Address Translation (NAT), a technology widely used for enterprise security, operates by translating the 'from'

TheMojoPin
04-08-2003, 11:04 AM
My ISP RULES. Except when he's drunk.

<img src=http://www.zone-sf.com/images/drstrange.jpg>

<img src="http://members.hostedscripts.com/randomimage.cgi?user=TheMojoPin">
2% << FREE YERDADDY! >> "You can tell some lies about the good times you've had/But I've kissed your mother twice and now I'm working on your dad..."