GodDAMN, your burning love for her is just speading from thread to thread! "Piece of...", eh? NICE. You dawg....you dirty, dirty dawg...ROCK THAT SHIT.
Well, no, actually, there are few people on this earth who fit the description "piece of shit" more accurately than Hillary.
Everyone hates Hillary so much, but I haven't been able to figure out what specifically she has done that makes her so hated.
Yeah, so she's essentially a republican in democrats clothing. So what? Is that why people hate her so much? Becuase she straddles the line rather than sticking to the strict, antagonistic (and I'm already on record saying how stupid and useless and pointless and retarded it is) division between "republican" and "democrat"?
If you think she's a Republican in Democrat's clothing, you REALLY don't follow politics closely.
ONE of the reasons why people don't like her is because she's inherently shallow in a lot of the positions she takes. This would be what you're talking about not "straddling the line". It's not so much that - it's just that she sticks her finger in the air, sees which way the wind is blowing, and that's what she bases her opinion on at the moment. Now, granted, most politicians do this - but not so egregiously as Hillary. She'll be for a position, UNTIL she finds out it's not politically favorable to a portion of her potential constituents, and then she'll do a complete 180. She does this A LOT.
She's dishonest as well, and doesn't hold herself as accountable to anyone. She lies outright and then denies it. She lied about many of the things she supposedly did for the victims of 9-11 following the disaster. Claimed she visited certain events, raised funding, etc., and then a book was published (by a LIBERAL, one of her good friends) which totally exposed everything she had claimed as a fabrication (I forget the name of both the book AND the author - if any of you out there knows who I'm talking about, please help out).
And, of course, there's the fact that she's extremely left-wing and neo-socialist. This goes all the way back to the 60s (and the thesis she published which, for some inexplicable reason, is not available to the public). If she were ever elected to the presidency, she would try and bring in socialist iniatives such as resdistrubition of wealth and all of that other stuff which essentially goes against our capitalist society.
She's dangerous. I wouldn't put that label on too many people, but I would with her. Some of you people quake in fear of Ashcroft? I live in fear of what would become of us should Hillary ever get that kind of power. Hopefully, I think there are a good number of people out there who aren't so enamored with her and Bill that they realize that she shouldn't be given such power.
But then, hey, I thought the people of New York would be bright enough to not elect her, and I was proven horribly wrong before.
<img border="0" src="http://se7enrfnet.homestead.com/files/captainamerica.jpg" width="300" height="100">
<br><marquee behavoir=alternate>Cap sez: <b>2%</b> fat skim milk does a body good!</marquee>