walking joint
01-02-2004, 09:47 AM
I don't understand the criteria for Comeback player of the year. to me the "comeback" part means you have a player who reached a certain level of play, then for whatever reason (injury or bad performance) he has a bad year or two. Then he returns to his great level of performance...hence the comeback.
This year Jon Kitna won. He did have a good end to last season and had a good year this year. But the rest of his career has been horrible. So he had no high level of performance to return to. So what exactly was the comeback? Maybe most improved player, but not comeback. Stephen Davis should have won the award. He was a top running back...really struggled last year (mostly due to coaching) and has now returned or comeback to his old level of play.
Just something that bothered me today and was trying to get other opinions.
http://www.silentspic.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10004/RF.JPG
finally a sig...SatCam rules
This year Jon Kitna won. He did have a good end to last season and had a good year this year. But the rest of his career has been horrible. So he had no high level of performance to return to. So what exactly was the comeback? Maybe most improved player, but not comeback. Stephen Davis should have won the award. He was a top running back...really struggled last year (mostly due to coaching) and has now returned or comeback to his old level of play.
Just something that bothered me today and was trying to get other opinions.
http://www.silentspic.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10004/RF.JPG
finally a sig...SatCam rules