You must set the ad_network_ads.txt file to be writable (check file name as well).
Iraq!!!!! [Archive] - RonFez.net Messageboard

Log in

View Full Version : Iraq!!!!!


reeshy
09-17-2004, 06:13 PM
What Are WE Doing???? (http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/BFD0B2CB-B05B-4409-8EEC-E6E0C764A0FB.htm)

I am sick and tired about reading about this...just a few short months ago, I was a Bush supporter....Now...I just want to bring my people home...we're not supposed to be killers.......but that is what is happening..I'm so sick over this!!!!

[center]<IMG SRC="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=reeshy">
[center]

Tazz
09-17-2004, 06:15 PM
Aljazeera.net


Well, what the fuck are you doing reading that oh so reliable source?

<img src=http://tazz1376.homestead.com/files/homersig.gif>

reeshy
09-17-2004, 06:22 PM
Oh pleeze. Tazz..it's just as reliable as Fox News!!!!!

[center]<IMG SRC="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=reeshy">
[center]

BoondockSaint
09-17-2004, 06:28 PM
1. Don't trust Al Jezeera
2. We've killed innocent people before.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/squrl/piazzazakk.jpg
M1 is the shit!

furie
09-17-2004, 06:28 PM
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/pardons/images/tokyo.rose.jpg


<img src="http://homepage.mac.com/furie1335/.Pictures/rfsigs/uncanny141.jpg">

<a href="http://fallingtowardsapotheosis.blogspot.com/">mental vomit</a>

Tall_James
09-17-2004, 06:29 PM
Just be glad your ex-wife doesn't want to take you there!

<img src=http://www.christpuncherrecords.com/sigs/layla.jpg>
[center]"Freakshow Makes...Tall James Takes"

reeshy
09-17-2004, 06:31 PM
. We've killed innocent people before.


So what you're saying is because Americans did it...it's ok...I'm more worried about my people over there...I was in another war years agoand it was the same thing...kill the...they kill us...we killl them ..they kil us...nobody won.....and I'm a baby killer!!!!

[center]<IMG SRC="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=reeshy">
[center]

BoondockSaint
09-17-2004, 06:36 PM
No, what I'm saying is, don't act so surprised that innocent people get killed in a war. Show me a war where they didn't.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/squrl/piazzazakk.jpg
M1 is the shit!

HBox
09-17-2004, 06:36 PM
I'll tell you what's scary. I read we've actually scaled back operations a bit this month and STILL casualties are going up. And the other day military leaders said they can't guarantee the safety of the Green Zone anymore. Things ain't good.

http://www.myimgs.com/random/hbox/sig

reeshy
09-17-2004, 06:41 PM
I was in war before...I saw civilians killed...what I'm trying to say is get our troops out now before this becomes a firestoem..I'm mtelling you...these Moslems won't stop.....just give it up!!!!!

[center]<IMG SRC="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=reeshy">
[center]

mdr55
09-17-2004, 07:17 PM
..I'm mtelling you...these Moslems won't stop.....just give it up!!!!!


If we do that the terrorist win. Give Bush another 4 years to fix this mess.

reeshy
09-17-2004, 07:20 PM
MDR...I was a great supporter of Bush until 6 months ago...now...no......I feel we should keep the search for terrorists going ...but not the war!!!!!!

[center]<IMG SRC="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=reeshy">
[center]

BoondockSaint
09-17-2004, 07:25 PM
Are you John Kerry?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/squrl/piazzazakk.jpg
M1 is the shit!

HBox
09-17-2004, 07:31 PM
Give Bush another 4 years to fix this mess.

We gave him 4 years already and he MADE this mess.

http://www.myimgs.com/random/hbox/sig

mdr55
09-17-2004, 07:36 PM
Give Bush another 4 years to fix this mess.

We gave him 4 years already and he MADE this mess.

He didn't make the mess. The terrorists and Saddam did. Victory is around the corner and the people of Iraq are better off without Saddam in power.

GodsFavoriteMan
09-18-2004, 12:55 AM
[He didn't make the mess. The terrorists and Saddam did. Victory is around the corner and the people of Iraq are better off without Saddam in power.



Sources have confirmed to CNN that a National Intelligence Estimate was sent to the White House in July with a classified warning predicting the best case for Iraq was "tenuous stability" and the worst case was civil war.

According to this, victory is far from any visible corners.



<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~stan_ferguson/GFMSIG_copy.jpg" width="300" height="107"></p>

Reephdweller
09-18-2004, 03:18 AM
My feeling on this is similar to the others in that we are still at war. People die all the time, the innocent while regrettable will at times get caught up in it there's no way around it. I'm pretty confident that when the military says they make every effort possible to reduce the amount of lost life. That may sound naive for me to say, but I believe it to be true.

Reeshy, like you I have seen enough, read enough, watched enough over the past year to make me question Bush and his ability to lead. However as that time as gone on I have also come to seriously question John Kerry. If there was a viable candidate who possessed the strength, leadership, and vision needed to bring us out of this war, go after the terrorists as well as places like Iran and North Korea, as well as capable of developing a domestic agenda to restore the economy, stregthen our home security and national security. I just don't think that John Kerry is the man for this. Not that GW is either, but I do feel better for whatever reason with the idea of him in there over Kerry. My opinion might change during the debates, but at this point after all the Kerry speeches I've seen and read, and interviews he's done I've concluded that I don't feel he's right for the job.

I don't say this because I've voted for GW in the past. I say it because I actually do my homework in this area and read and keep myself up on the goings on and based on everything I've seen and read I've come to this conclusion. Which isn't to say that you or anyone hasn't. But I've read much from many different websites, magazines, etc, as well as whatever I may catch on c-span, and the big news outlets. To make it short and sweet, I don't get my info from Fox news.

<center><IMG SRC="http://www.chaoticconcepts.com/randomizer/random.php?uid=3">
Reefy's website... (http://www.osirusonline.com/)</center>
<font size="1" color="red">
<center>Check out The Ron and Fez Show Logs...UPDATED!!!!! (http://www.osirusonline.com/ronfez.htm)</center>
<marquee behavior=alternate bgcolor="#FFFFFF">Right now you could care less about me...
but soon enough you will care, by the time I'm done</marquee> </font>

This message was edited by Reefdweller on 9-18-04 @ 7:22 AM

Captain Rooster
09-18-2004, 01:39 PM
Shit, Reesh.

I think you are the men, but what the fuck are you doing listening to Al Jazeera. Gimme a break dude. My best friends are there dude...and they are not targeting civilians.

I am surprised bro.

The guys and girls there just want to survive the war. they are not targetinf civilians.

And as far as the Muslim thing goes, you are dead on. They won't stop. They plan on killing Christians in the Philip., the Sudan, England, Spain, The US, and all over the world.

This is a Holy War. I guess Johnny Civilian hasn't figured that out...but I thought you would have.

Fuck Al Jazeera.
THEY SHOW VIDEO OF OUR BOYS BEING SLAIN FOR GOD'S SAKE!!!!!!!

<img src=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v53/monster6sixty6/guests/cr2_sig.jpg>
ANIMAL MOTHER!

Yerdaddy
09-18-2004, 01:46 PM
Islamic fundamentalists want it to be a holy war. As long as they are in the minority, which they are, this is not a holy war. Unless we are stuipid enough to give them what they want and make it a holy war. If we do that, and we make it a holy war, and we alienate the moderate and liberal Muslims and turn them against us, then we will know suffering like most of them do.

But what we have now is nothing like a holy war. It is bad, and it is heading in the wrong direction, but it is far from qualifying as that.

I just thought that point had to be made.

Also, Reeshy didn't say were were targeting civilians. I don't want to speak for him, but I thought he was pointing out the fact that civilian casualties are being shown on Arab television and that is making us more hated.

My own thoughts are that civilian casualties are an inevitable fact of war, but that the US doesn't quite think of civilian casualties in the same way that most of the rest of the world does. We haven't suffered civilian casualties, (in any significant numbers), in over 150 years because we haven't had a war fought on our soil since the Civil War. There aren't many other places on the earth that can say that, and I think that makes for some of the profound differences in the way we look at war compared to the way the rest of the world does. It makes us tend to recognize the cost of war less in human terms, and less so before the war than after it.

Either way, civilian casualties are going to be a weapon that will be used against us, not because they are shown on Arab TV, and not because we are targetting civilians, but because this was our decision to make this war. We took on that responsibility and it is going to cost us in blood, treasure, and prestige. It's a difficult situation, (and one we should have learned from Vietnam), but it is our burden. The only thing we can do is make sure our leadership is making the best decisions about how the war is conducted - do we have enough troops? are decisions being made for domestic political considerations and not military? do we think we need more of these kinds of wars or not? Being that we have a democracy, it is as much our responsibility to make good decisions as it is for our representatives.

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=bonedaddy5">
Fuck it from behind.

This message was edited by Yerdaddy on 9-18-04 @ 6:03 PM

Captain Rooster
09-18-2004, 01:58 PM
Thank, Yerdaddy, I appreciate YOUR comments. What I do not appreciate is Al Jazeera's comments.

Read "Holy War" by Karen Armstrong and tell me if this not a holy war. Of course it is. Al Sadr--what the hell do you think he's leading? A food drive?


<img src=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v53/monster6sixty6/guests/cr2_sig.jpg>
ANIMAL MOTHER!

This message was edited by Captain Rooster on 9-18-04 @ 6:02 PM

TheMojoPin
09-18-2004, 02:03 PM
It's a pretty one-sided "Holy War."

I guess my thinking is like this...yeah, THOSE guys are mostly fighting for the "holy glory" on their side, or at least using that as rallying point...but "we" aren't fighting with that same mentality. I mean, in the past, a holy war was something like one of the Crusades...with Christians and Muslims fighting BECAUSE they're Christians and Muslims, not because they're Europeans and Arabs. And both sides were trying to either completely destroy the other side or convert them to their faith.

Today, you definitely have one side trying to do that...but not the other. That's why it doesn't seem like a "holy war" to me...it's just a different kind of enemy from anything our particular country has fought before. But we're still fighting it like a "regular" war...whatever that is.

I dunno, I didn't think too many people weren't aware of the driving force of fundamentalism in the current conflicts. It's pretty hard to ignore.

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin">
1979 << I love my drug buddy... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

Captain Rooster
09-18-2004, 02:10 PM
"It's a pretty one-sided 'Holy War.'"

Well, I guess you think we should fight fair? Bare fisted? Hand to hand.

I don't think so. If my boys over there need to level a city to get home, I say go for it.

We are dealing with a religion that calls for the death of all infidels. You think not. I know.

Give me a break. We have not had a terrorist attack here in three years. you think these groups have not been trying. read "Shadow Warriors" my friend. These Muslims have been planning our destruction for over thirty years--wait, will you blame us for that?

I dunno. What I do know is that I was almost blown to Hell for some fucking terrists wish on 9/11--yes, I stood these--in front of those buildings.

Now, I stnad ready to be called by a military that expects me to fight for the American people. Not for some international communtiy led by the Frech who have nothing but cash to gain from us leaving Iraq.





<img src=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v53/monster6sixty6/guests/cr2_sig.jpg>
ANIMAL MOTHER!

Yerdaddy
09-18-2004, 02:17 PM
Of course it is. Al Sadr--what the hell do you think he's leading? A food drive?

Why is it then that Ayatollah Sistani has urged Shiites to cooperate with the US occupation from the beginning of the war, (and has been largely successful), was able to walk into Najaf and bring a peacefull end to the weeks-long battle, (arguably leaving the country for medical attention as a cover to allow the US to pound Sadr's militia militarily), and who's strongest opposition to the Coalition Authority was that the original scheme for choosing Iraqi leaders wasn't democratic enough? Sadr is a minor religious figure who wanted to be a major political figure when he was left out of the process of forming an Iraqi government. His presence does not qualify this as a holy war.

My point is that we have too many Arab and Muslim allies in this "war on terror" for it to be a holy war. When we lose those allies, then I'll call it a holy war.

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=bonedaddy5">
Fuck it from behind.

TheMojoPin
09-18-2004, 02:19 PM
Wait, wait, wait...

Well, I guess you think we should fight fair? Bare fisted? Hand to hand.

Where the heck did I say anything even remotely close to that?

I said I don't think it's a "holy war" from our perspective because we're not fighting "for" a religion like they are. How does that get turned into what's quoted above? I'm talking about "holy wars" in the political and social sense and as an idea, not the tech or strategies of the current conflict itself.

We are dealing with a religion that calls for the death of all infidels. You think not. I know.

Again, where are you getting this from? My last paragraph was about how it seemed OBVIOUS to me the violent Islamic fundamentalism was what we were fighting against here. That's obvious to ANYONE with half an eye open, to be blunt. Anyone not thinking this has their head in the sand.

Give me a break. We have not had a terrorist attack here in three years. you think these groups have not been trying.

Seriously, none of this has anything to do with what I posted above. Why are you talking like I'm pretending Islamic terrorism doesn't exist? WHERE DID I BLAME US FOR ANYTHING HERE?

Come on, what did I say that deserves to be jumped on like this? All I said is that WE'RE not fighting a holy war because we're not fundamentalists. Hence a one-sided holy war.

And are you talking about the Clancy book? That was pretty interesting...I was thinking of Ghost Wars at first, which is a pretty damn scary and interesting read.

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/1594200076.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin">
1979 << I love my drug buddy... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

This message was edited by TheMojoPin on 9-18-04 @ 6:21 PM

Captain Rooster
09-18-2004, 02:22 PM
Yerdaddy,

What is the guise he wears? Religion.

What did the attackers on 9/11 wear? Religion.
What did the assholes who killed the Marines in Beirut wear? Religion.
What did the Cole bombers wear? Religion.
What did the embassy bombers in Africa wear? Religion.

Oh, they wore Christ's LOVE ETHIC? No, Islamic fundamentalism. Muslim power-hungry bullshit.

Tell me I'm wrong.


<img src=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v53/monster6sixty6/guests/cr2_sig.jpg>
ANIMAL MOTHER!

Yerdaddy
09-18-2004, 02:23 PM
If my boys over there need to level a city to get home, I say go for it.

Come on! Seriously! What exactly is our objective in Iraq that leveling cities is even a hypothetical means of achieving?

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=bonedaddy5">
Fuck it from behind.

TheMojoPin
09-18-2004, 02:29 PM
Oh, they wore Christ's LOVE ETHIC? No, Islamic fundamentalism. Muslim power-hungry bullshit.

In all seriousness, I don't understand what's being argued here.

Is there really ANYONE on this board who thinks we aren't fighting against Islamic fundamentalism in post-Saddam Iraq? Or Afghanistan? Or in the wake of 9/11?

It's obvious that's what we're fighting on a larger scale. I don't really see anyone disputing that, or trying to.

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin">
1979 << I love my drug buddy... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

reeshy
09-18-2004, 02:30 PM
Shit, Reesh. I think you are the men, but what the fuck are you doing listening to Al Jazeera. Gimme a break dude. My best friends are there dude...and they are not targeting civilians. I am surprised bro.



Rooster,


know thy enemy..I read all sorts of news sources...What I'm getting out of this whole scenario is that it is turning into nothing but another war of attrition..they kill 1 of ours...we kill 10 of theirs...we're have we seen this before??

[center]<IMG SRC="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=reeshy">
[center]

Yerdaddy
09-18-2004, 02:32 PM
What did the attackers on 9/11 wear? Religion.
What did the assholes who killed the Marines in Beirut wear? Religion.
What did the Cole bombers wear? Religion.
What did the embassy bombers in Africa wear? Religion.

Are we fighting for religion too? Are we fighting against all of Islam? Do terrorists represent all Muslims?

If the answer to any of these is "yes" then, OK, it's a holy war.

But you're using inductive reasoning. You're saying: TERRORIST = MUSLIMS -- THEREFORE MUSLIMS = TERRORISTS.

If that were the case then why would we "liberate" all those terrorists? Why are we trying to form a "democracy" of terrorists? Why are we creating an Iraqi Civil Defense Corps out of terrorists?

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=bonedaddy5">
Fuck it from behind.

TheMojoPin
09-18-2004, 02:35 PM
Fundamentalism is nothing to sneeze at. I mean, look at what's happening in Iraq, and those are mostly insurgent groups. If you want a "modern" example, just look at the Japanese in WW2. There's a case of rampant fundamentalism (In that case more nationalistic than religious, but the zealotry was still there) having a country and a full military machine behind it, and it was brutal. If we need to look to see what we're fighting against on a larger scale, look to that.

THAT'S why I say it's obvious fundamentalism is the enemy. It's some bad shit.

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin">
1979 << I love my drug buddy... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

Captain Rooster
09-18-2004, 02:35 PM
Reesh, I hear every word you are saying. I just hear from my boys all the time and they say that they are making a difference. For example, I am sending clothes over there for a young girl they adopted. Our boys are doing their best.


Yerdad, I am just talking through visceral reaction. I want me boys home. if a dude wants to kill my guy, I say my boy should use everything at hit command to stay alive.

Mojo, I know you are in on this now, but I think you are removed from the original thought. Reeesh started with comments from AL JAZEERA!!!!! to start this fucking thread--give me a break. I know--we all know the fundamentalists--are freaky-deaky. What I want to high light is that fact that NO MATTER who is in control, the simplest man with a box cutter can take down a nation and trhat is what WE are trying tp prevent.

<img src=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v53/monster6sixty6/guests/cr2_sig.jpg>
ANIMAL MOTHER!

TheMojoPin
09-18-2004, 02:40 PM
Mojo, I know you are in on this now, but I think you are removed from the original thought. Reeesh started with comments from AL JAZEERA!!!!! to start this fucking thread--give me a break. I know--we all know the fundamentalists--are freaky-deaky. What I want to high light is that fact that NO MATTER who is in control, the simplest man with a box cutter can take down a nation and trhat is what WE are trying tp prevent.

OK, I totally hear you on this.

I'm back on course now!

Your last post pretty perfectly demonstrates the completely split nature of the conflict in Iraq...there ARE plenty of Iraqis who have welcomed coalition forces, and worked with our troops...but then just as many, if not more, who'd as soon frag a convoy or set off a car bomb in front of a police station or blow up a power plant. The troops are expected to be peacemakers, peacekeepers, fighters, warmongers and nationbuilders, and it's just pulling people in too many different directions.

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin">
1979 << I love my drug buddy... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

This message was edited by TheMojoPin on 9-18-04 @ 6:42 PM

Captain Rooster
09-18-2004, 02:42 PM
Mojo, I sense sarcasm. I am not trying to change your thoughts. I just want to make a point: we need to look beyond the bullshit of Al Jazeera to formulate our opinions. Mojo, I want you alive. I want all of NY alive. And I know there are some who won't rest until the city is razed.

<img src=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v53/monster6sixty6/guests/cr2_sig.jpg>
ANIMAL MOTHER!

TheMojoPin
09-18-2004, 02:46 PM
Mojo, I sense sarcasm.

Really, I can assure you, there's not. Trust me, your overall point rings very true...there are people out there, fighting us right now, who want as many of us as possible to be dead, and as quickly as possible. There's nothing for me to disagree with there.

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin">
1979 << I love my drug buddy... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

This message was edited by TheMojoPin on 9-18-04 @ 6:46 PM

Captain Rooster
09-18-2004, 02:48 PM
Thanks, Mojo. I want my boys home...and I do not want some fundamentalist killing my family.



<img src=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v53/monster6sixty6/guests/cr2_sig.jpg>
ANIMAL MOTHER!

reeshy
09-18-2004, 02:49 PM
Rooster,

calm down.....i could have found the same type of article in the AMerican media..what I was trying to say is that I don't to see our occupation of Iraq turn into nothing but a tit for tat guerrilla war....which is what it is turning into...I don't want 1 more American servicemen killed for these fucking animals...I'm on your side, Buddy!!!!

[center]<IMG SRC="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=reeshy">
[center]

TheMojoPin
09-18-2004, 02:50 PM
Yeah, but if you looks at this conflict on even a basic level and compare it to Vietnam, it's being fought very differently and clearly based on what happened to us in Vietnam. Those lessons don't seem to have been lost.

Honestly, I think we will be there for a good long while. The direct attacks on our troops will probably last a few more years, but I don't see it dragging out as long as Vietnam. With Iraq, it seems more likely the conflict will shift to an Iraqi civil war.

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin">
1979 << I love my drug buddy... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

This message was edited by TheMojoPin on 9-18-04 @ 6:55 PM

Captain Rooster
09-18-2004, 02:53 PM
I pray!





<img src=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v53/monster6sixty6/guests/cr2_sig.jpg>
ANIMAL MOTHER!

This message was edited by Captain Rooster on 9-18-04 @ 6:55 PM

JPMNICK
09-18-2004, 03:22 PM
this Vietnam comparison kills me. it is not even close. 1000 people have died, which is a shame. i know people who are there. i know people who died in the towers.

but vietnam? i think that is a bit of a stretch. 58,000 americans died in vietnam. not to mention those who were mangled up, shell shocked and basically a different person when they came home.

There are as of Sept. 2001, 90,107 Vietnam Veterans that our government rates at 100% disabled from their time in the service and thousands more, that are rated so disabled that they will never hold a job again

this is not that. nor do i think it will turn into that. i drives me crazy when people try and compare it. just because soldiers die, does not mean it is Vietnam. to me, comparing it, is disrespectful to vietnam vets. we have some assemblence of control over there. just because some soldiers get killed but a truck bomb does not mean that it is happening at every check point in iraq.

http://home.comcast.net/~nickcontardo/a_schilling_ft1.jpg
Thanks to Monsterone for my first sig.

Yerdaddy
09-18-2004, 03:53 PM
I don't think I could have been any more vague in my comparison to Vietnam. Yes, there are fundamental differences. Yes, the body count was much higher...

But what worries me is that we didn't understand the culture and the political realities when we took on this committment. We thought this would be easy and yet we have no idea how long we will be in there or how we are going to get out. We have too easily accepted the weak excuses for going into this war, just like we did in Vietnam. We are being sold this war as a part of some grand ideological strategy of good vs. evil that only makes sense to us, and then even if we don't look at it very closely. Basically, my comparison between Vietnam and Iraq are the broad lessons that Robert McNamara is now saying he wished he'd learned earlier.

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=bonedaddy5">
Fuck it from behind.

TheMojoPin
09-18-2004, 03:54 PM
Hey, even Vietnam had to start somewhere.

The comparisons are more in the style of fighting of the enemy, and their apparent pack mentality/fanatacism. Any armchair historian would probably find those comparisons apt.

In terms of the size and type of enemy we are fighting, it's VERY similar. The terrain may be different, and the scale...but the similarities are there.

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin">
1979 << I love my drug buddy... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

JPMNICK
09-18-2004, 03:54 PM
i actually was not commenting on anyone in this thread brining up the Vietnam thing. it was more of a general statement about the media and radio shows.

http://home.comcast.net/~nickcontardo/a_schilling_ft1.jpg
Thanks to Monsterone for my first sig.

reeshy
09-18-2004, 04:00 PM
Viet nam started off slow too.....this thing is going to drag on for many years....no matter who gets elected in November...we're too entrenched to just get out now....besides...big money is being made with this conflict!!!

[center]<IMG SRC="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=reeshy">
[center]

Yerdaddy
09-18-2004, 04:14 PM
besides...big money is being made with this conflict!!!

...just like...
http://www.freewebs.com/panho/fmj1.JPG!!!

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=bonedaddy5">
Fuck it from behind.

TheMojoPin
09-19-2004, 05:45 PM
I don't know why this has stayed out of the Politics forum, but allow me to do the honors...and add a little something...

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Leading members of President Bush's Republican Party on Sunday criticized mistakes and "incompetence" in his Iraq policy and called for an urgent ground offensive to retake insurgent sanctuaries. (http://cnn.aimtoday.cnn.com/news/story.jsp?floc=FF-RTO-PLS&idq=/ff/story/0002/20040919/1312745745.htm&photoid=20040910WHT42D)

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin">
1979 << I love my drug buddy... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

reeshy
09-19-2004, 05:48 PM
Most excellent, Yerdaddy...me love you long time!!!!!

[center]<IMG SRC="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=reeshy">
[center]

reeshy
09-19-2004, 05:52 PM
I think the president is being clear. I would like to see him more clear," McCain said. He said Congress was expected to hold hearings on Iraq soon.


Nothing but "Doublespeak".....I have a really bad feeling that we lost this thing over there.....I say pull back and see what the next threat is...we've don all we can in Iraq and all we do is make more enemies!!!

[center]<IMG SRC="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=reeshy">
[center]

This message was edited by reeshy on 9-19-04 @ 9:54 PM

FUNKMAN
09-19-2004, 05:56 PM
it's desperate times for the Administration... even Republicans are beginning to join together with Democrats to confront Bush on his 'optimistic views' on what's 'really' going on inside Iraq...

hand Saddam over to the Iraqi government and get our guys and girls out. if the Iraqi people truly want democracy let them figure out a way to obtain it...

<img src="http://img18.photobucket.com/albums/v53/monster6sixty6/guests/fm_sig.jpg">

HBox
09-19-2004, 06:04 PM
Off the top of my head I can name 5 Democrats and 3 Republicans I would easily vote for over these two. I have no confidence in Bush, and have no idea what Kerry would do beyond trying to get more foriegn troops. The farther we go, the more this seems like 2000.

http://www.myimgs.com/random/hbox/sig

This message was edited by HBox on 9-19-04 @ 10:04 PM

Lumber
09-19-2004, 06:05 PM
Off the top of my head I can name 5 Democrats and 3 Republicans I would easily vote for over these two. I have no confidence in Bush, and have no idea what Kerry would do beyond trying to get more foriegn troops. The farther we go, the more this seems like 2000.

http://www.myimgs.com/random/hbox/sig

This message was edited by HBox on 9-19-04 @ 10:04 PMI could`nt agree w/ you more H...
Well said

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=jtodd">

reeshy
09-19-2004, 06:08 PM
Off the top of my head I can name 5 Democrats and 3 Republicans I would easily vote for over these two. I have no confidence in Bush, and have no idea what Kerry would do beyond trying to get more foriegn troops. The farther we go, the more this seems like 2000.


Ypu know, Hbox, this is probably inly the second time I agreed on you opinion...I have been a steadfast Republican all my life....Bush is starting to scare the shit out of me!!!!!

[center]<IMG SRC="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=reeshy">
[center]

sighborgh
09-19-2004, 06:13 PM
If we do that the terrorist win. Give Bush another 4 years to fix this mess.


What?!! give him ANOTHER four years to lie about why we're there?!! To fix a mess we should never have gotten into in the first place?!! Why have people in this country gone insane!! I don't get it! Enough already! How bout this? NO! It's going to take someone else to get us out of this. His childish ego won't let him see this horrible mistake for what it is. I'm so scared this jackass is going to win. It'll be the worst that could happen to this country. The only thing worse than him getting "elected" (yeah, right) in the first place.
Now go ahead label me a liberal or some crap like that. Like that would make anything he's done not true.

TheMojoPin
09-19-2004, 06:13 PM
Maybe we've found what will eventually end this partisan bullshit! Mutual alienation over the projected candidates from the parties...

BROTHERS AND SISTERS!

COME TO THE MIDDLE!

TURN YOUR BACK ON THE PARTIES!

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin">
1979 << I love my drug buddy... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

HBox
09-19-2004, 06:16 PM
I have actually considered voting for Nader. I very likely won't because I agree with just about all of Kerry's stances on domestic issues, but that I would even consider it just speaks to how badly Kerry has handled foreign policy.

http://www.myimgs.com/random/hbox/sig

reeshy
09-19-2004, 06:31 PM
I'm voting for the Middle Earth Party.....Tolkien forever!!!!!

[center]<IMG SRC="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=reeshy">
[center]

HBox
09-19-2004, 08:14 PM
George W. Bush as Baghdad Bob. (http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/pressingissues_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=10006327 53)

http://www.myimgs.com/random/hbox/sig

Yerdaddy
09-19-2004, 08:35 PM
EDIT: moved rambling bullshit post to newer more relevant thread, where it will not be read by anyone who values their time.

This message was edited by Yerdaddy on 9-20-04 @ 12:50 AM

HBox
09-19-2004, 08:52 PM
I feel like a genius for coming up with this analogy. Too bad only Simpsons fans will get it. Here it is:

Remember the episode Homer the Vigilante? It's the one where a catburglar hits Springfield, and ends with the catburglar sending the town on a mad dash for his buried treasure. They finally find the area where the treasure is, and start digging. They find a chest, and it turns out the burglar tricked them so he could escape. Undetered, Homer proclaims, "The treasure must be deeper. Keep digging!" They finally find themselves in a huge hole they can't climb out of. Homer proclaims, "Don't worry, we'll dig our way out!" Chief Wiggum then says, "No, no! Dig up stupid!"

Bush is Homer. Kerry is Wiggum. I hope you stayed with that and found it as amusing as I did.

http://www.myimgs.com/random/hbox/sig

TheMojoPin
09-20-2004, 06:46 AM
Wow, that was great. I am awed.

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin">
1979 << I love my drug buddy... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

A.J.
09-20-2004, 06:50 AM
I feel like a genius for coming up with this analogy. Too bad only Simpsons fans will get it. Here it is:

Remember the episode Homer the Vigilante? It's the one where a catburglar hits Springfield, and ends with the
catburglar sending the town on a mad dash for his buried treasure. They finally find the area where the treasure is, and start digging. They find a chest, and it turns out the burglar tricked them so he could escape. Undetered, Homer proclaims, "The treasure must be deeper. Keep digging!" They finally find themselves in a huge hole they can't climb out of. Homer proclaims, "Don't worry, we'll dig our way out!" Chief Wiggum then says, "No, no! Dig up stupid!"

Bush is Homer. Kerry is Wiggum. I hope you stayed with that and found it as amusing as I did.

Or, the Bear Tax episode would have worked too.

<img src=http://img40.photobucket.com/albums/v124/Canofsoup15/Sigs/AJinDC-Sig.jpg>

A Skidmark/canofsoup15 production.

Red Sox Nation

TheMojoPin
09-20-2004, 07:04 AM
The one where Lisa becomes a vegetarian is almost spot-on in its breakdown of the current partisan climate in America today.

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin">
1979 << I love my drug buddy... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."