British politico bitch-slaps Congress! [Archive]

View Full Version : British politico bitch-slaps Congress!

TheMojoPin

05-19-2005, 11:01 AM

<a href="http://news.ft.com/cms/s/2e19dd66-c73b-11d9-a700-00000e2511c8.html" target="_blank">SUCK IT!!!</a><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-1616578,00.html" target="_blank">TAKE IT TO THE ROOT!!!</a> quote: George Galloway, the independent British member of parliament, charged yesterday that a Senate investigation that alleged he was granted Iraqi oil allocations was a "smokescreen" aimed at obscuring criticism of the US-led invasion of Iraq. <table align="right" border="0"><tr><td valign="middle" align="right"> </td></tr></table>In blistering testimony in Washington, he said the committee had no evidence he received any money from an alleged 20m barrels of oil allocations issued to him, through his associates, in return for his support for lifting sanctions against the regime of Saddam Hussein."I am not now nor have I ever been an oil trader, and neither has anyone on my behalf," he said in testimony under oath before the Senate permanent subcommittee on investigations. "If you had any letters on me they would have been up there on a slide-show."Mr Galloway, who had earlier warned he came "not as the accused but as the accuser", then used the Senate committee floor to launch a tirade against US Iraq policy. "I told the world that your case for the war was a pack of lies," he said. "In everything I said about Iraq I turned out to be right, and you turned out to be wrong, and 100,000 people have paid with their lives, 1,600 of them US soldiers."You are trying to divert attention from the crimes you supported."   quote: "Now I want to deal with the pages that relate to me in this dossier and I want to point out areas where there are - let's be charitable and say errors. Then I want to put this in the context where I believe it ought to be. On the very first page of your document about me you assert that I have had 'many meetings' with Saddam Hussein. This is false.  "I have had two meetings with Saddam Hussein, once in 1994 and once in August of 2002. By no stretch of the English language can that be described as "many meetings" with Saddam Hussein. "As a matter of fact, I have met Saddam Hussein exactly the same number of times as Donald Rumsfeld met him. The difference is Donald Rumsfeld met him to sell him guns and to give him maps the better to target those guns. I met him to try and bring about an end to sanctions, suffering and war, and on the second of the two occasions, I met him to try and persuade him to let Dr Hans Blix and the United Nations weapons inspectors back into the country - a rather better use of two meetings with Saddam Hussein than your own Secretary of State for Defence made of his."  <img height="204" src="http://images.thetimes.co.uk/TGD/picture/0,,200208,00.jpg" width="150" border="0" />A-fucking-men.<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin" border="0" /> 1979 << On the streets of your town... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

This message was edited by TheMojoPin on 5-19-05 @ 3:02 PM

Death Metal Moe

05-19-2005, 11:04 AM

Any pics of his teeth?

<IMG SRC="http://unhallowed.com/sigs/NewToolsSuckAss.jpg">

<A HREF="http://www.unhallowed.com">www.unhallowed.com</A>
<A HREF="http://thebigsexxxy.blogspot.com/">One Big SeXXXy Blog</A>

Tall_James

05-19-2005, 11:08 AM

Please.  He left right after saying this to go see Oasis.  How can I take anything he now says seriously?

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=tall_james"> 

The Cheese-Eating Bird (http://cheeseeatingbird.blogspot.com)

TheMojoPin

05-19-2005, 11:08 AM

Any pics of his teeth?They were too busy sinking into the flesh of Rumsfeld's wrinkly ass. <img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin" border="0" /> 1979 << On the streets of your town... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

This message was edited by TheMojoPin on 5-19-05 @ 3:11 PM

Knowledged_one

05-19-2005, 11:15 AM

Yeah lets believe what he says.  Look at the facts 3 of the countries that wanted us out of Iraq - France, Germany and Russia all have been linked to taking money from Saddam shock beyond shock.  But we are to believe that this guy is innocent even though he all but sucked Saddam off at a Manchester U match.  Maybe we should leave it to the trusty UN and Kofi Annan to solve this problem

<IMG SRC="http://img.ranchoweb.com/images/aggie2323/celticssig.jpg">
ODB is free

furie

05-19-2005, 11:16 AM

what was their responce? "Oh yeah? Your Motha!" 

<img src="http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y178/furie1335/rfsigs/ghostrider2.jpg" width=300 height=100>

<a href="http://fallingtowardsapotheosis.blogspot.com/">mental vomit</a>

TheMojoPin

05-19-2005, 11:21 AM

quote: Yeah lets believe what he says.  Look at the facts 3 of the countries that wanted us out of Iraq - France, Germany and Russia all have been linked to taking money from Saddam shock beyond shock.  But we are to believe that this guy is innocent even though he all but sucked Saddam off at a Manchester U match.  Maybe we should leave it to the trusty UN and Kofi Annan to solve this problem<img src="http://img.ranchoweb.com/images/aggie2323/celticssig.jpg" border="0" /> ODB is free Why shouldn't we believe him?  He flat-out called out Congress and told them to present their evidence that he did something wrong and they couldn't.  He didn't fold to their bluff.  Just because you don't WANT to believe doesn't mean he actually did anything wrong.  And what do the three countires you listed have anything to do with a British politician?And why the fuck are we somehow exempt from sharing the blame for "taking money from Saddam?"  He paid us...for weapons!  Yet somehow those other countries are somehow MORE guilty of doing the same? 

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin">

1979 << On the streets of your town... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

Death Metal Moe

05-19-2005, 11:30 AM

"In everything I said about Iraq I turned out to be right, and you turned out to be wrong, and 100,000 people have paid with their lives, 1,600 of them US soldiers.If only we'd have listened to this guy.  Get this guy on the job, baby!I love that 100K number.  He's not the 1st opponent of the Iraq war to quote it.  It's about the same number people were warning would die if we went to war.  I want to see any evidence of that.Hey, America ain't perfect.  We've delt with assholes to help ourselves that the time, to have it come back to bite us.  If this guy is innocent, then whoever accused him wrongly should be made to answer.  I know I wouldn't want that to happen to me.  But I want all the facts.  Like Furie said, what was the panel's response to this?  I didn't read the article yet because I'm hungry.

<IMG SRC="http://unhallowed.com/sigs/NewToolsSuckAss.jpg">

<A HREF="http://www.unhallowed.com">www.unhallowed.com</A>
<A HREF="http://thebigsexxxy.blogspot.com/">One Big SeXXXy Blog</A>

Knowledged_one

05-19-2005, 11:31 AM

Because when he got weapons it was viewed as the lesser of two evils in the stand-off with Iran.  Not to mention there were NO COUNT THEM ZERO UN SANCTIONS against Iraq at the time.  However, taking illegal oil vouchers for money to give favor against a country under sanctions is illegal, surely even a dumbocrat like you can see that.

<IMG SRC="http://img.ranchoweb.com/images/aggie2323/celticssig.jpg">
ODB is free

Furtherman

05-19-2005, 11:32 AM

George Galloway is my new hero.  His testimony should have been broadcast on every network for all to see.Common sense - it's amazing.  Print it out and nail it to George W's door."Senator, in everything I said about Iraq, I turned out to be right and you turned out to be wrong and 100,000 people paid with their lives; 1600 of them American soldiers sent to their deaths on a pack of lies; 15,000 of them wounded, many of them disabled forever on a pack of lies. If the world had listened to Kofi Annan, whose dismissal you demanded, if the world had listened to President Chirac who you want to paint as some kind of corrupt traitor, if the world had listened to me and the anti-war movement in Britain, we would not be in the disaster that we are in today. Senator, this is the mother of all smokescreens. You are trying to divert attention from the crimes that you supported, from the theft of billions of dollars of Iraq's wealth. "Have a look at the real Oil-for-Food scandal. Have a look at the 14 months you were in charge of Baghdad, the first 14 months when $8.8 billion of Iraq's wealth went missing on your watch. Have a look at Haliburton and other American corporations that stole not only Iraq's money, but the money of the American taxpayer. "Have a look at the oil that you didn't even meter, that you were shipping out of the country and selling, the proceeds of which went who knows where? Have a look at the $800 million you gave to American military commanders to hand out around the country without even counting it or weighing it."Have a look at the real scandal breaking in the newspapers today, revealed in the earlier testimony in this committee. That the biggest sanctions busters were not me or Russian politicians or French politicians. The real sanctions busters were your own companies with the connivance of your own Government."

<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/Furtherman/furtherblur.jpg" alt="Image hosted by Photobucket.com">

Death Metal Moe

05-19-2005, 11:33 AM

Come on now Knowledged One, no name calling.  You know Mojos a card carrying Commie anyway.

<IMG SRC="http://unhallowed.com/sigs/NewToolsSuckAss.jpg">

<A HREF="http://www.unhallowed.com">www.unhallowed.com</A>
<A HREF="http://thebigsexxxy.blogspot.com/">One Big SeXXXy Blog</A>

HBox

05-19-2005, 11:35 AM

I'd be wary of supporting this guy. He's said
some crazy shit in the past, one of which was I believe, "The greatest
tragedy of my life was the fall of the Soviet Union."

http://img255.echo.cx/img255/5972/mariosig8fk.jpg

Death Metal Moe

05-19-2005, 11:43 AM

I also read on the AP that he said "Joanie love Chachie is the break out hit of 1982 and will be here long after we're all dead."

<IMG SRC="http://unhallowed.com/sigs/NewToolsSuckAss.jpg">

<A HREF="http://www.unhallowed.com">www.unhallowed.com</A>
<A HREF="http://thebigsexxxy.blogspot.com/">One Big SeXXXy Blog</A>

Tall_James

05-19-2005, 11:45 AM

I also remember when he said that "...Gary Cherone is going to make every Van Halen fan forget David Lee Roth & Sammy Hagar!"

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=tall_james"> 

The Cheese-Eating Bird (http://cheeseeatingbird.blogspot.com)

Knowledged_one

05-19-2005, 11:46 AM

I wasn't calling names merely referring to my own mod quote as i used to say it all the time....i know mojo hates these things that is why i am busting his chops on the name thing, but other then calling him names i was right about everything i said

<IMG SRC="http://img.ranchoweb.com/images/aggie2323/celticssig.jpg">
ODB is free

torker

05-19-2005, 11:50 AM

<img height="138" src="http://sidesplitters.catastrophe.net/arch/2003/bitch-slap.jpg" width="293" border="0" />George Galloway: "[Fawaz Zureikat] is not my intermediary. He doesn't act on my behalf and I have never received money or vouchers, whatever they are, from him. He was a friend who was doing business in Iraq before I knew him."The Telegraph: During the interview with this paper on April 21 last year, Mr Galloway was asked: "Did you write a letter nominating or naming Mr Zureikat as your representative, or the [Mariam] campaign's representative, in Baghdad?" Mr Galloway replied: "Yes."The Telegraph's Baghdad papers contained a letter purportedly from Mr Galloway and bearing his House of Commons address and a signature similar to his own. Addressed "To whom it may concern", it stated: "This is to certify that Mr Fawaz A. Zureikat is my representative in Baghdad on all matters concerning my work with the Mariam Appeal or the Emergency Committee in Iraq." The letter referred to Mr Zureikat's "dealings on my behalf".<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/04/24/ngall124.xml">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/04/24/ngall124.xml</a>                    With your bitch slap rappin'                       And your cocaine tongue                        You get nuthin' done 

[center]<IMG SRC=http://home.comcast.net/~rmfallon/RFnettorker1313.jpg>[center]
[center]Blurring the thin line between enigmatic and unpopular.
[center]

Death Metal Moe

05-19-2005, 11:55 AM

I think I have a cousin in Syria named Fuwaz.  Kind of a cool name.

<IMG SRC="http://unhallowed.com/sigs/NewToolsSuckAss.jpg">

<A HREF="http://www.unhallowed.com">www.unhallowed.com</A>
<A HREF="http://thebigsexxxy.blogspot.com/">One Big SeXXXy Blog</A>

Death Metal Moe

05-19-2005, 11:56 AM

<img height="628" src="http://www.rockmusic.org/gnr/fotos/grupo/fotoaxl04.jpg" width="450" border="0" />DO YOU KNOW WHERE YOU ARE MR. GALLOWAY??YOU'RE IN AMERICA BABY!YOU'RE GONNA GET ACCUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSED!

<IMG SRC="http://unhallowed.com/sigs/NewToolsSuckAss.jpg">

<A HREF="http://www.unhallowed.com">www.unhallowed.com</A>
<A HREF="http://thebigsexxxy.blogspot.com/">One Big SeXXXy Blog</A>

TheMojoPin

05-19-2005, 12:19 PM

quote: Because when he got weapons it was viewed as the lesser of two evils in the stand-off with Iran.  Not to mention there were NO COUNT THEM ZERO UN SANCTIONS against Iraq at the time.  However, taking illegal oil vouchers for money to give favor against a country under sanctions is illegal, surely even a dumbocrat like you can see that. <img src="http://img.ranchoweb.com/images/aggie2323/celticssig.jpg" border="0" /> ODB is free You heard it hear first, people...ethics only count if they're on paper.Oh, and Galloway is a nut.  Just check out his political history back home in the UK...but on this issue, the US had nothing on him when they called him out, and he schooled Congress with it.  What he said here, on this issue, I agree completely with.  Am I saying food for oil wasn't a corrupt program?  No.  I'm saying the Congress investigation hit a dead end with this guy, and got burned by it.  Some people simply aren't going to be bullied by hypocrites, and it's about goddamned time.  If we're gonna shake our fingers at the UN and other countries for dealing with Saddam, then we need to stop whitewashing our own history.  Pretty much everyone is guilty of coddling this guy...or worse.And Moe, you're right to be wary about the 100k figure tossed out.  The more accurate estimates place the civilian death toll between 22,000 and 25,000 thus far...but let's not act like that's any less horrible.<a href="http://www.mapbureau.com/publish/donalda/iraqbodycount/index.html" target="_blank">Body count thus far...</a> <img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin" border="0" /> 1979 << On the streets of your town... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

This message was edited by TheMojoPin on 5-19-05 @ 4:20 PM

Death Metal Moe

05-19-2005, 12:28 PM

And Moe, you're right to be wary about the 100k figure tossed out.  The more accurate estimates place the civilian death toll between 22,000 and 25,000 thus far...but let's not act like that's any less horrible.I thought as much.  And it isn't any less horrible.  That's a lot of people. If their deaths lead to a stable Iraq with a brighter future than what Saddam had to offer, hopefully their families will have some satisfaction in that.  It's easy to sit here and not see the death 1st had with out smug estimates and debates.  I just wanted to mention that.And like I said, if we accused this guy falsely, he should make a stink.  And that pisses me off, because there's so many REAL events, both good and bad that we could focus on.  Then, someone makes something up about this side show phoney?  Who cares.Now, we DO have egg on our face it seems.

<IMG SRC="http://unhallowed.com/sigs/NewToolsSuckAss.jpg">

<A HREF="http://www.unhallowed.com">www.unhallowed.com</A>
<A HREF="http://thebigsexxxy.blogspot.com/">One Big SeXXXy Blog</A>

A.J.

05-20-2005, 01:58 AM

"You are trying to divert attention from the crimes you supported." Having watched his testimony on SkyNews, he tended to divert attention from the crimes he may have COMMITTED.I'm not saying that his accusations against the Senate weren't inaccurate or unjustified, but when asked to respond directly to specific questions, he tended to go off on the "you're guilty of war crimes" rant.

<img src=http://img40.photobucket.com/albums/v124/Canofsoup15/Sigs/AJinDC-Sig.jpg>

A Skidmark/canofsoup15 production.

Red Sox Nation

Knowledged_one

05-20-2005, 04:43 AM

So let me get this straight22,000 to 25,000 civilians dead - how many killed by our troops?  How many killed by terrorists or insurgents?And lets look a little more at the numbers:25,000 dead civilians compared with the 80,000 bodies that have been uncovered in mass graves or the double of that amount that just disappeared under Saddams rule. So 25,000 to liberate or 240,000 dead/missing under a rutheless dictator i wonder which one the Iraqi people prefer.  Or the fact that Saddam you know chemically attacked his own people because thats ok.

<IMG SRC="http://img.ranchoweb.com/images/aggie2323/celticssig.jpg">
ODB is free

TheMojoPin

05-20-2005, 07:13 AM

Not. Why.We.Went.To.War.How many times does this need to be said?  The objective changed constantly, and was never consistent.  There's no continuity, because we haven't applied this standard of "justice" ANYWHERE else in the world.  We gambled on finding WMD's and lost, and now the losers want to change the scenario after they got embarassed on a global.And civilians are being killed at a faster rate now then they ever were under Saddam, so we'll pass his total in no time.  Yeah, at this point, most of those casualties are coming from the terrorist attacks...but those only are happening BECAUSE we're there and our leaders had no cohesive plan for post-war Iraq.  So how is that a better alternative?  How did we "win?"  How is life better for the Iraqi people?  How is the world any safer from ANYTHING?  What was won?!?And Saddam chemically attacked his people with means given to him by...ahhh, what's the point anymore?<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin" border="0" /> 1979 << On the streets of your town... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

This message was edited by TheMojoPin on 5-20-05 @ 11:14 AM

Furtherman

05-20-2005, 07:20 AM

*Osama Bin Laden raises hand*Oooh Oooh!  I know!  I know! Well said Mojo.

<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/Furtherman/furtherblur.jpg" alt="Image hosted by Photobucket.com">

Knowledged_one

05-20-2005, 07:38 AM

Actually it wasn't all about WMD it was the fact that Iraq ignored UN Security Council resolutionsOh like the Range of the Iraqi Al Samooud Missile that exceeded the range put on it by the UN by 350 miles, a range that would allow Iraq to strike Isreal and the missiles were tipped with warheads capable of carrying WMD.  So let me see they ignored that.  They ignored inspectors.  How much longer could it go on.  And to say the people of Iraq aren't better off is ludicrous the fact is without Saddamm foreign news reports everything up, do you think Saddamm would allow the publication of people the gov't kidnapped and killed?Take off the Blue tinted glasses and look at the situation realistically

<IMG SRC="http://img.ranchoweb.com/images/aggie2323/celticssig.jpg">
Kicking it old school on the board again

Furtherman

05-20-2005, 07:41 AM

They ignored inspectors. The inspectors wanted more time but George W had no time to stall his plan.  If George W had let the inspectors do their job we would have avoided the no-shit-sherlock moment we had a few weeks ago when the report came out that there was never any WMDs.

<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/Furtherman/furtherblur.jpg" alt="Image hosted by Photobucket.com">

Knowledged_one

05-20-2005, 07:48 AM

It is not that there were no WMD's it was that none were found

<IMG SRC="http://img.ranchoweb.com/images/aggie2323/celticssig.jpg">
Kicking it old school on the board again

jeffdwright2001

05-20-2005, 07:57 AM

quote: It is not that there were no WMD's it was that none were found <img src="http://img.ranchoweb.com/images/aggie2323/celticssig.jpg" border="0" /> Kicking it old school on the board again And so we stopped looking because . . .A. we know they're there, we just got tired of lookingB. we are conceding that there weren't any to findC.  it's like when I tell the ladies:  "it's not that I don't have a 20 inch penis, it's that you haven't found it."  

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=jeffdwright2001"> 
"It is not best to use our morals weekdays, it gets them out of repair for Sunday." - Mark Twain 1898

Thanks to Reefy & M1 for my sigs!!

HBox

05-20-2005, 08:12 AM

I changed my mind. I don't want to get involved in this again. <img border="0" src="http://img255.echo.cx/img255/5972/mariosig8fk.jpg" />

This message was edited by HBox on 5-20-05 @ 12:18 PM

Bulldogcakes

05-21-2005, 03:40 PM

quote:I changed my mind. I don't want to get involved in this again. Amen.   BTW-If
you FOLLOW British politics at all, you know this guy all too well
(George Galloway) He broke with the labor party over the war (and other
issues) and formed "The Respect Party" which proposes to take the UK
back to all the old, failed ideas of the old Labor Party. Which sounded
so great to the citizens of Great Britian they re-elected Tony Blair
(despite widespread public opposition to the war) and gave Respect
about 5% nationwide. You should have heard some of his stump speaches.
Straight out of 1920's Russia, complete with red faced spit flying with
every word. This guys a FLAKE. The British Al Sharpton/Louis
Farrakhan/Noam Chomsky. Appeals to the poor, uneducated and
angry.  

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v303/Kevin2700/bulldaogcopy.jpg

Do Siamese twins have to file seperate tax returns? Or do they file jointly?

TheMojoPin

05-21-2005, 04:49 PM

No shit...I already copped the guy was a nut at the start of the thread...but that doesn't make what he said when he was called before Congress wrong.  Outside of the casuality figure, the man served them. And has the level of public dissent in this country really dropped to the level of just giving up?  How many things can this administration get away with?!?  Now THAT'S the real pussification of America...<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin" border="0" /> 1979 << On the streets of your town... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

This message was edited by TheMojoPin on 5-21-05 @ 8:50 PM

Bulldogcakes

05-22-2005, 06:09 AM

It would be more meaningful if it came from someone with some credibility.Unlike George Galloway.    

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v303/Kevin2700/bulldaogcopy.jpg

Do Siamese twins have to file seperate tax returns? Or do they file jointly?

TheMojoPin

05-22-2005, 09:20 AM

Well, unfortunately, nobody over here apparently has the balls.

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=TheMojoPin">

1979 << On the streets of your town... >> "You can tell some lies about the good times we've had, but I've kissed your mother twice...and now I'm working on your dad..."

Yerdaddy

05-22-2005, 10:35 AM

quote: Actually it wasn't all about WMD it was the fact that Iraq ignored UN Security Council resolutionsOh like the Range of the Iraqi Al Samooud Missile that exceeded the range put on it by the UN by 350 miles, a range that would allow Iraq to strike Isreal and the missiles were tipped with warheads capable of carrying WMD.  So let me see they ignored that.  They ignored inspectors.  How much longer could it go on.  And to say the people of Iraq aren't better off is ludicrous the fact is without Saddamm foreign news reports everything up, do you think Saddamm would allow the publication of people the gov't kidnapped and killed?Take off the Blue tinted glasses and look at the situation realistically<img src="http://img.ranchoweb.com/images/aggie2323/celticssig.jpg" border="0" /> Kicking it old school on the board again In February 2003, U.N. inspectors evaluated two versions of the Al Samoud 2 missile using four separate computer models. Both versions were found to exceed the range limit of 150 kilometers (93 miles) set by the U.N. Security Council. The lighter version of the Al Samoud 2 was estimated to have a range of 193 kilometers, while the heavier version would be capable of a 162 km range. Accordingly, it was requested that all Al Samoud 2 missiles and warheads be delivered to the inspectors for destruction. <a href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iraq/samoud.htm" target="_blank">http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iraq/samoud.htm</a> Inspectors had destroyed most of these missiles at the time the US launched this war. Seriously, do your homework if you're going to rant and rave about this shit. I do. And give me the stats on how many countries are currently in violation of UN sanctions - including the US. You know you don't care about UN sanctions. You're only giving that horseshit because there were no weapons of mass destruction. If you want to make the case that they existed, then you can site the US weapons inspection report - or, give it a rest. Basically, sight some sort of source. Just once would be a start.As for your "Supporting Iraq was the lesser of two evils when it was at war with Iran" horseshit: Were the Kurds the greater of two evils at that time? Because the first Bush administration chose to aid Saddam AFTER he was gassing the Kurds - his own people! Where do the Kurds fit in on your evil-ometer? Now, or then? I'm sick of you so-called freedom fighters and lovers of Iraqi people pretending to give two shits about these people - when it's just a ruse to suck up to your ideological leader! Have any of you fuckers ever met these people? Kurds? Iraqis? Iranians? You're the same fuckers that make the glib generalizations about "those people" whenever one, or some of them do something we don't like! You're not fooling anyone. Shut the fuck up. The Iraqi people are not your political tool.

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=bonedaddy5">
Fuck it from behind.

Bulldogcakes

05-22-2005, 01:22 PM

quote:<img border="0" src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=bonedaddy5" /> 
That "Wheel of Fortune" thing is a killer sig pic. Did you come up w/it? Very Creative. As thanks for the chuckle, here's a little Vanna<img width="300" height="300" border="0" src="http://www.femir.fsnet.co.uk/vannawhite004.jpg" /> 

<img border="0" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v303/Kevin2700/bulldaogcopy.jpg" />


<a target="blank" href="http://bulldogcakes.tripod.com/index.html">My brand spankin new site Bully Baby</a> Do Siamese twins have to file seperate tax returns? Or do they file jointly?





This message was edited by Bulldogcakes on 5-22-05 @ 5:30 PM

sr71blackbird

05-22-2005, 06:28 PM

<img height="196" src="http://www.bhbdental.co.nz/images/pi_69.gif" width="180" border="0" /> Or.. <img height="181" src="http://www.dialup.texascenterforcosmeticdentistry.com/crooked-before.JPG" width="300" border="0" />

<center>
http://www.chaoticconcepts.com/randomizer/random.php?uid=8 </center>

<center>My Thanks to Just Jon, Reefdwella, ADF, Yerdaddy,Monsterone and Katylina for the sig-pic help and creation!</center>
<marquee behavior=alternate>Which Witch Wished Which Wicked Wish?</marquee>

MrPink

05-22-2005, 06:59 PM

finding WMDs in Iraq aint as easy as just looking in a few missile silos. theres alot of desert where saddam could have had them buried.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v507/Catholiccannon/gunsnammo.jpg I like to dissect women. Did you know I'm utterly insane?

high fly

05-25-2005, 04:07 PM

quote: finding WMDs in Iraq aint as easy as just looking in a few missile silos. theres alot of desert where saddam could have had them buried.   Yes, and hiding 50,000 tons of chemical weapons is a bit more involved than a game of, "Button, button, who has the button?"PLUS those chemical weapons have to be kept refrigerated, you know, so alls we gotta do is find some long-ass extension cords leading into a big pile of dirt...Don't you think someone would know about it?Like all the scientists and such who we captured and who have the option of getting that luxury manse on the Rivierra by leading us to the WMD instead of being held in Abu Ghraib ?And don't you think they'd have maps and other records of where it all is?And don't you think those records would be worth something for whoever produced them?  The plain and simple fact of the matter is, for all of the administration claims about  * The WMD-equipped fleet of UAVs,* The aluminum tubes,* The reconstituted nuke program,* The mobile WMD labs,* The al Qaeda connection,* The uranium from Niger,* The designer germs and about another half-dozen I can't recall off the top of my head, they had contrary intelligence they refused to believe.It wasn't as cut-and-dried as the intelligence community being unanimous in saying Saddam was going to nuke us and kill us off with chem/bio weapons.What the administration did was come up with a conclusion and then tailor the facts to fit that conclusion. This exercise in intellectual dishonesty has cost this country dearly, and those unnecessary costs will continue well into the future. And "playing it safe" by believing the worst, just to be sure is wrong as well. A historic example well worth learning from is the Cuban Missile Crisis.When exploring the options available to him, President Kennedy was told there was no way, short of an invasion, to be certain that all the missiles threatening the U.S. were gone.Plans and preparations were made to invade, just in case that is what JFK decided.The majority opinion of his advisors was to "be sure" and to invade.Fortunately, for all of us, Kennedy was swayed by the minority opinion and did not.HAD WE INVADED, WORLD WAR III WOULD HAVE RESULTED, BECAUSE THE SOVIETS HAD 70 TACTICAL NUKES THERE AND HAD ISSUED ORDERS THEY BE USED IF THE U.S. INVADED.Kennedy had the wisdom George W. Bush lacks.  

" and they ask me why I drink"
http://64.177.177.182/katylina/highflysig.jpg
Big ups to sex bomb baby Katylina (LHOOQ) for the sig!

high fly

05-25-2005, 04:13 PM

quote: It is not that there were no WMD's it was that none were found    I've always liked the theory that they were sent through Syria to Lebannon, in the Bekaa Valley where Iran-backed Hezbollah has so much sway, so that just when Saddam needed them most, the WMD would be right there at hand. Or not.     

" and they ask me why I drink"
http://64.177.177.182/katylina/highflysig.jpg
Big ups to sex bomb baby Katylina (LHOOQ) for the sig!

Death Metal Moe

05-25-2005, 04:21 PM

I know that the fact that no WMDs were found can't be disputed, but I just want to ask people why they think Saddam would just stop making them, or destroy them on his own?  He was fucking insane, and I don't think anyone will dispute that on either side of this.  He was also very good at the art of delaying inspectors.  Do you think the world over estimated how much he had?  Do you think he actually destroyed them?  Did the inspectors do enough to diminish his supply while they were allowed in?

<IMG SRC="http://unhallowed.com/sigs/NewToolsSuckAss.jpg">

<A HREF="http://www.unhallowed.com">www.unhallowed.com</A>
<A HREF="http://thebigsexxxy.blogspot.com/">One Big SeXXXy Blog</A>

torker

01-14-2006, 04:49 AM

THE credibility of George Galloway was looking increasingly strained yesterday after the controversial MP, a contestant in the <a href="http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=63412006" target="_blank">cult</a> reality show Celebrity Big Brother, was seen by millions of TV viewers pretending to be a cat. 

[center]<IMG SRC=http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y201/torker1313/bobos.jpg>[center]

[i][center]Take my soul to the lost and found[center][i]