You must set the ad_network_ads.txt file to be writable (check file name as well).
All your science question answered!! [Archive] - RonFez.net Messageboard

PDA

View Full Version : All your science question answered!!


booster11373
02-10-2006, 06:20 AM
<p>This came up on the show yesterday. After reading a few selections what can I say I'm a believer it was all there in the Bible right along</p><p><a href="http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/qa.asp" target="_self">http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/qa.asp</a></p><p>This world needs a crusade against stupidity.</p>

booster11373
02-10-2006, 06:22 AM
<p>A related story</p><p>What to make a quick 1000 dollars</p><p><font color="#800080">Church offers $1000 to prove Earth revolves around the Sun</font> </p><p>CAI will write a check for $1,000 to the first person who can prove that the earth revolves around the sun. (If you lose, then we ask that you make a donation to the apostolate of CAI). Obviously, we at CAI don't think anyone CAN prove it, and thus we can offer such a generous reward. In fact, we may up the ante in the near future.</p><p><a href="http://www.catholicintl.com/epologetics/articles/science/geochallenge.htm" target="_self">http://www.catholicintl.com/epologetics/articles/science/geochallenge.htm</a></p><p>these people are'nt related to real catholics are they?</p>

Furtherman
02-10-2006, 06:22 AM
<p>I blame Gutenberg.</p>

Sheeplovr
02-10-2006, 06:33 AM
<p>what does Sega have to do with Science unless it explains Quatim Physics playing Sonic 2</p><p><img width="248" height="192" border="0" src="http://www.cyberiapc.com/vgg/stills/sms/sonic2_1.gif" />&nbsp;</p>

Tall_James
02-10-2006, 06:41 AM
Phew.&nbsp; My questions about whether or Noah was actually a Martian have been answered.

TheRealEddie
02-10-2006, 07:38 AM
<p>Wow, what an amazing collection of bs. <img border="0" src="http://www.ronfez.net/messageboard/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/images/laugh.gif" /><br /></p>

pennington
02-10-2006, 07:34 PM
By &quot;proof&quot; we mean that your explanations must be direct, observable, physical, natural, repeatable, unambiguous and comprehensive. We don't want hearsay, popular opinion, &quot;expert&quot; testimony, majority vote, personal conviction, organizational rulings, superficial analogies, appeals to &quot;simplicity,&quot; &quot;apologies&quot; to Galileo, or any other indirect means of persuasion which do not qualify as scientific proof.<br /><p>So, even if you put them in a spaceship and followed the Earth around the sun, they would say it was an optical illusion. </p><p>I thought those &quot;we never landed on the moon&quot; groups were wacko,&nbsp;but they're forward thinkers compared to this crew.</p>

Marc with a c
02-10-2006, 08:04 PM
WOW. i had no idea phil collins was also a drummer. great site<br />

TheRealEddie
02-11-2006, 07:32 PM
<p>Actually the proof is a little tricky just because the question is poorly posed. &quot;Rotation about&quot; really depends on your reference frame. And there is no such thing as a &quot;preferred&quot; reference frame. The solar system itself is spinning about the center of the milky way as it is believed that we are in a spiral galaxy. So it seems that as stupid as that site is, and as rediculous the point they are trying to make, they do have an out in that they can play on words.</p><p>But yes, the motion within our solar system is &quot;best&quot; described, based on observations, as the planets orbiting the sun.<br /></p><p> </p>



<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by TheRealEddie on 2-11-06 @ 11:35 PM</span>

Mike Teacher
02-11-2006, 10:18 PM
<p>Forget where I first heard the term for this stuff, but 'data retrofitting' seems to be what these sites are about.</p><p>Its like shooting the arrow at a big blank target, and wherever it hits, that where you draw the bulleye;&nbsp;they&nbsp;look at&nbsp;the bible answers they have to explain; then pick and choose anything remotely resembling legit science that bolsters their case, and utterly ignore that which goes against their already-drawn conclusion.</p>

Bulldogcakes
02-12-2006, 05:12 AM
<p>Yeah, on the one hand they want to dismiss scientific conclusions, and then use science to back up their case. </p><p>I think religion and science serve two very different purposes, and should be kept seperated.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>

<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by Bulldogcakes on 2-12-06 @ 10:55 AM</span>

bobrobot
02-12-2006, 05:23 AM
<p><strong><font color="#000099">HEYYY!!! You got science in my religion!!!</font></strong></p><p><img height="464" src="http://community-2.webtv.net/Fayst/REESESPEANUTBUTTER/scrapbookFiles/mailedD46.jpg" width="608" border="0" /></p>

furie
02-12-2006, 06:23 AM
wow. these fragile little minds will cling to anything just to keep the bible intact. they really are scared.