Does Suri Cruise exist? [Archive] - RonFez.net Messageboard

Tenbatsuzen

07-23-2006, 08:37 PM

I'm surprised there hasn't been a lot of chatter here.  So let's go. Personally, I never bought for an instant that the baby was Cruise's and Katie's pregnancy was just so... weird that a lot of things weren't adding up. It doesn't help things when the only person who's "seen the baby" is a fellow Scientologist.  (Leah Remini) So what's your take?  What's going on here? Here's my take on this mess: There's rumblings that Scientology doesn't like birth defects and/or "unhealthy" children.  Apparently, a child of a noted scientologist is Autistic and has received ZERO treatment. I don't know what kind of pre-natal care Katie underwent before the baby was born, but something is just seriously... wrong here.

kdubya

07-23-2006, 08:47 PM

The baby is half black, and for some reason keeps talking about what good friends she is with Living Color

Reephdweller

07-23-2006, 08:53 PM

<img height="641" src="http://www.cartoon.me.uk/images/smallJackNicholson_RSSize(401x641).jpg" width="401" border="0" />The kids a fako!

PapaBear

07-23-2006, 08:56 PM

I can't see what the point would have been in faking it. The truth would eventually come out. I'm leaning toward birth defect.

Reephdweller

07-23-2006, 08:57 PM

Leah Remini claims to have seen her.Regardless though, the below story has the WORST headline ever!!!<a href="http://www.toledofreepress.com/?id=3657" target="_blank">Better safe than Suri</a>

TheGameHHH

07-23-2006, 09:04 PM

Isn't this child still in the infancy stages, a lot of problems in children aren't able to be diagnosed until later life stages.

PapaBear

07-23-2006, 09:06 PM

TheGameHHH wrote: Isn't this child still in the infancy stages, a lot of problems in children aren't able to be diagnosed until later life stages. The speculation is that it's a problem that is very evident. Hence, the lack of pictures after 3 months.

Tenbatsuzen

07-23-2006, 09:10 PM

Reefdweller wrote: Leah Remini claims to have seen her.Regardless though, the below story has the WORST headline ever!!!   Again, Leah is a Scientologist and part of the cult.  Therefore I will not believe her. You guys have to understand - there's no pics of them going to and from cars - no nothing.  Even before a baby "officially" comes out, there's still some paparazzi snaps... but... nothing. The fact that the Cruises haven't come out and said anything squashing these rumors is also kind crazy.  If people were saying my newborn kid was fucked up, I'd be pissed off.

Tenbatsuzen

07-23-2006, 09:11 PM

TheGameHHH wrote: Isn't this child still in the infancy stages, a lot of problems in children aren't able to be diagnosed until later life stages.    Autism, yes.  Retardation, down syndrome, Kid's half black - not so much. Here's the looming question, did KAtie have pre-natal checkups?

FUNKMAN

07-23-2006, 09:14 PM

Cruise jumped on the couch and killed it...

TheGameHHH

07-23-2006, 09:35 PM

wouldn't it be hysterical if Tom and Katie never recognized the fact that they had a kid from here on out. Reporters asking them, 'Can we see Suri?' and them just answering with something like, 'I don't even know who you're referring to, we never had a child'

high fly

07-23-2006, 09:50 PM

She exists, something is wrong and she still gets my vote for governor of New Jersey...

SatCam

07-23-2006, 09:55 PM

she was abducted

Don Stugots

07-24-2006, 02:16 AM

its been reported that a certain celebrity baby bares a stricking resemblance to E.T- just asking.

foodcourtdruide

07-24-2006, 04:18 AM

Why does there have to be something wrong with her? Maybe the family just doesn't want photograph's of their child sold for money, I don't blame them. He jumped on a couch because he was happy about his relationship. So he's gay.He doesn't believe in using mind-altering pills to treat mental illness. So he's crazy.He believes in scientology (which makes just about as much sense as any other religion). So he's brainwashed. Get in line sheep! Think what they tell you to think!

Reephdweller

07-24-2006, 04:49 AM

I don't believe her either, I just missed that you wrote that too so I was reporting it.I think it's all BS.

mendyweiss

07-24-2006, 05:07 AM

Doctor Manhattan

07-24-2006, 05:54 AM

I clicked on the thread to click on this choice, but it was missing so I posted this picture.<img src="http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/9758/wclogoeb6.gif" border="0" />Tom and Katie are assholes but the kid (if it's real) is just a kid who didn't ask for any of this crap. If it's real what a weird situation, you're born into the family of two stars (one HUGE one, and a TV star who is now a big star) but they are crazy.

This message was edited by Doctor Manhattan on 7-24-06 @ 9:56 AM

A.J.

07-24-2006, 06:32 AM

She's as real as the intercourse that Tom and Katie had to conceive her.

kdubya

07-24-2006, 06:50 AM

Doctor Manhattan wrote: I clicked on the thread to click on this choice, but it was missing so I posted this picture.<img src="http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/9758/wclogoeb6.gif" border="0" />Tom and Katie are assholes but the kid (if it's real) is just a kid who didn't ask for any of this crap. If it's real what a weird situation, you're born into the family of two stars (one HUGE one, and a TV star who is now a big star) but they are crazy.This message was edited by Doctor Manhattan on 7-24-06 @ 9:56 AM I have to agree

OGC

07-24-2006, 07:24 AM

foodcourtdruide wrote: Why does there have to be something wrong with her? Maybe the family just doesn't want photograph's of their child sold for money, I don't blame them. ....  Exactly. Just because a celebrity couple has a baby, the public seems to think they are entitled to see it. This is only a story because the press is making it a story.I can't be sure of this, but I think that when Cruise was married to Nicole Kidman and they adopted their babies, they were kept away from the press also.It is just an instance of two parents not wanting to expose their baby to the madness that is the press.

Tenbatsuzen

07-24-2006, 07:59 AM

Both of you aren't getting it. Both Tom and Katie shoved the fact down our thoats that they are SOOOOO in love, and Katie's SOOOOO knocked up, and then she gives birth, and NOTHING. The ends of the spectrum - ALWAYS being in our face, and then NOTHING - screams of something being wrong, and the public's natural curiosity comes out/ If the public isn't entitled to pictures, then why haven't the parents made some sort of statement of the condition of their child? Tom was so quick to sue papers for calling him gay - where is he now, when the papers are accusing him of something wrong with his child?

Tenbatsuzen

07-24-2006, 08:00 AM

Doctor Manhattan wrote: I clicked on the thread to click on this choice, but it was missing so I posted this picture.<img border="0" src="http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/9758/wclogoeb6.gif" />Tom and Katie are assholes but the kid (if it's real) is just a kid who didn't ask for any of this crap. If it's real what a weird situation, you're born into the family of two stars (one HUGE one, and a TV star who is now a big star) but they are crazy.

This message was edited by Doctor Manhattan on 7-24-06 @ 9:56 AM   No offense, the energy you expended to say "Who Cares" shows that you do care on a small level.

PhishHead

07-24-2006, 08:23 AM

Just to put it into perspective...with Tom and Nicoles kids, they were not first photographed until they were 4 and 2.  So obviously Tom has done this before.

Furtherman

07-24-2006, 08:24 AM

Exactly.  I wouldn't worry about it.

Tenbatsuzen

07-24-2006, 08:25 AM

PhishHead wrote: Just to put it into perspective...with Tom and Nicoles kids, they were not first photographed until they were 4 and 2. So obviously Tom has done this before.    There's a difference.  Those were the "official" photographs, but there were candid/paparazzi snaps when they were first "received". Technically, there's no official pics of Violet Affleck, but she has been snapped by paparazzi.

OGC

07-24-2006, 08:26 AM

Tenbatsuzen wrote: Both of you aren't getting it.Both Tom and Katie shoved the fact down our thoats that they are SOOOOO in love, and Katie's SOOOOO knocked up, and then she gives birth, and NOTHING.The ends of the spectrum - ALWAYS being in our face, and then NOTHING - screams of something being wrong, and the public's natural curiosity comes out/If the public isn't entitled to pictures, then why haven't the parents made some sort of statement of the condition of their child?Tom was so quick to sue papers for calling him gay - where is he now, when the papers are accusing him of something wrong with his child?Well, Tom and Katie have made themselves celebrities, they have more or less agreed that they need to deal with the press to survive in their chosen field. The child made no such agreement. If Tom and Katie all of a sudden disappeared along with the baby I could see your pointYou are right, I suppose they should at least make some kind of statement about the child but I don't even think the public is entitled to that. I still think this is another example of the press manufaturing a news story instead of reporting it.

PhishHead

07-24-2006, 08:46 AM

Tenbatsuzen wrote:  PhishHead wrote: Just to put it into perspective...with Tom and Nicoles kids, they were not first photographed until they were 4 and 2. So obviously Tom has done this before.    There's a difference.  Those were the "official" photographs, but there were candid/paparazzi snaps when they were first "received". Technically, there's no official pics of Violet Affleck, but she has been snapped by paparazzi.  No there were was only 1 paparazzi photo of cruises 2nd child and i believe 2 of the first one...he keeps them very confinded in their house until he is ready to bring them outside. and i believe they were both over 1 year old when the candids happened.

This message was edited by PhishHead on 7-24-06 @ 12:51 PM

foodcourtdruide

07-24-2006, 09:38 AM

Tenbatsuzen wrote: Both of you aren't getting it. Both Tom and Katie shoved the fact down our thoats that they are SOOOOO in love, and Katie's SOOOOO knocked up, and then she gives birth, and NOTHING. The ends of the spectrum - ALWAYS being in our face, and then NOTHING - screams of something being wrong, and the public's natural curiosity comes out/ If the public isn't entitled to pictures, then why haven't the parents made some sort of statement of the condition of their child? Tom was so quick to sue papers for calling him gay - where is he now, when the papers are accusing him of something wrong with his child?  Shoved it down our throats? By going on a few TV shows and saying that she's pregnant and that they're happy they're shoving it down our throats? The MEDIA shoved it down our throats. If the media simply ignored Cruise on Oprah or in his interview with Matt Lauar <sp?>, then we wouldn't be talking about it.Why is the public entitled to know ANYTHING about their child? It's almost as if you want to take away his personal freedoms becasue of his celebrity status.

Tenbatsuzen

07-24-2006, 09:43 AM

foodcourtdruide wrote: Tenbatsuzen wrote: Both of you aren't getting it. Both Tom and Katie shoved the fact down our thoats that they are SOOOOO in love, and Katie's SOOOOO knocked up, and then she gives birth, and NOTHING. The ends of the spectrum - ALWAYS being in our face, and then NOTHING - screams of something being wrong, and the public's natural curiosity comes out/ If the public isn't entitled to pictures, then why haven't the parents made some sort of statement of the condition of their child? Tom was so quick to sue papers for calling him gay - where is he now, when the papers are accusing him of something wrong with his child? Shoved it down our throats? By going on a few TV shows and saying that she's pregnant and that they're happy they're shoving it down our throats? The MEDIA shoved it down our throats. If the media simply ignored Cruise on Oprah or in his interview with Matt Lauar , then we wouldn't be talking about it.Why is the public entitled to know ANYTHING about their child? It's almost as if you want to take away his personal freedoms becasue of his celebrity status.   Tom acted like an ass on both the Oprah and Today show interviews.  The press picked up on that, saying "What the fuck?"  The media usually ignores people who goes on Oprah or the Today show, because they act like NORMAL FUCKING PEOPLE.   You're awfully quick to jump to conclusions.  Tom Cruise is and was a media whore.  Plain and simple.  He made the choice to go on those shows, he made the choice to do what he did, and he made the choice to be a part of a cult.The public is entitled to know about the child, because Cruise and Holmes made it a POINT to tell everyone about their courtship and pregnancy.  So they do all this, and then when the baby arrives, there's nothing? There's something that isn't right, and I'm entitled to not only opine about it, I'm also entitled to speculate it.  Why haven't they said anything to squash the public speculation?

Doctor Manhattan

07-24-2006, 09:44 AM

Tenbatsuzen wrote:  Doctor Manhattan wrote: I clicked on the thread to click on this choice, but it was missing so I posted this picture.<img src="http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/9758/wclogoeb6.gif" border="0" />Tom and Katie are assholes but the kid (if it's real) is just a kid who didn't ask for any of this crap. If it's real what a weird situation, you're born into the family of two stars (one HUGE one, and a TV star who is now a big star) but they are crazy.This message was edited by Doctor Manhattan on 7-24-06 @ 9:56 AM    No offense, the energy you expended to say "Who Cares" shows that you do care on a small level.  Actually, I didn't care about the baby, but I was curious to see if there was a "who cares" or some kind of jokey poll answer and how people were goofing on the poll.

torker

07-24-2006, 11:42 AM

cougarjake13

07-24-2006, 12:01 PM

it was tough to choose 2,3,4, and 5 all seem possible but i went with no baby it was a lieas for the no pictures its not entirely impossible that the papparazzi wouldnt have any pictures, considering they only brought her outside was when the baby was born (alledgely) and brought to their home, and im sure someone of tom cruise's wealth could find a way to get the child out of the hospital unnoticed and since then never have brought the kid outsideit's not like they're a normal couple who have to go out and shop for food themselves, etc. but the question to ask is who's watching the baby all day, i imagine that for some time it would have been them but im guessing that they have new projects in the works and have to go on location and shoot them so who's watching and better yet if that person would be tempted to take pics and sell them to the papparazzi<img height="100" src="http://home.comcast.net/~bob80/RFnetCougarJake13.jpg" width="300" border="0" />

JimBeam

07-24-2006, 12:05 PM

While the media may have shoved the arrangement down our throats they werent receiving much resistence from these 2 assclowns.Now all of a sudden they can resist and hide from the media ?And why has Remini seen the baby and not Travolta and Preston ?

Tenbatsuzen

07-24-2006, 02:21 PM

JimBeam wrote: While the media may have shoved the arrangement down our throats they werent receiving much resistence from these 2 assclowns.Now all of a sudden they can resist and hide from the media ?And why has Remini seen the baby and not Travolta and Preston ?   Two reasons... 1) On the scientology watchlist, Travolta's scientology background is almost as well known as Cruise's.  If this is a "stealth" move by the Cult, it would make sense to use a lesser-known Scientologist like Remini.  She is used as the mouthpiece, and people just think it's a famous friend, rather than a fellow scientologist. 2) I may or may not have mentioned Travolta earlier in this thread, without actually mentioning him.

JesterOfSadness

07-24-2006, 02:43 PM

They could have sacrificed the baby for the "good of the church"

suggums

07-24-2006, 02:55 PM

this thread is useless without these links:<a href="http://theunfunnytruth.ytmnd.com/" target="_self">1</a><a href="http://theunfunnysequel.ytmnd.com/" target="_self">2</a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLZJBdvqAv8&search=scientology" target="_self">3</a>

joeyballsack

07-24-2006, 03:13 PM

You left out the "They are waiting until the release of Toms next movie" option in the poll. Why is it so crazy that they havent released pictures yet ? Its not like they need the money they would get selling them to whichever tabloid. I wouldnt put pictures of my kid out for the public to see either in this day and age. That is sort of like inviting the public into thier private lives and has Tom ever pimped his kids out in the past for his own publicity ?As crazy as the guy is sometimes I have to agree with him on this one and also about the overprescribing of depression medication. There is no doubt there is a need for it at times, but I think its became the band aid for all kinds of problems that can probably be cured other ways, without some of the side effects that come with the pills.

OGC

07-24-2006, 04:33 PM

Tenbatsuzen wrote: There's something that isn't right, and I'm entitled to not only opine about it, I'm also entitled to speculate it. You are aboslutely right, you are entitled to opine and speculate all you want, but you aren't entitled to see pictures of the baby unless the parent say so.

FUNKMAN

07-24-2006, 04:35 PM

richg0404 wrote: Tenbatsuzen wrote: There's something that isn't right, and I'm entitled to not only opine about it, I'm also entitled to speculate it. You are aboslutely right, you are entitled to opine and speculate all you want, but you aren't entitled to see pictures of the baby unless the parent say so.Britney would love you...    and i think you're rightthey should have a "shoot the papparazi" day only instead of cameras they can use pellet guns...

DarkHippie

07-24-2006, 04:41 PM

part of me hopes that the baby is a waterhead. Maybe it'll shake scientology up a little bit

Don Stugots

07-24-2006, 04:44 PM

i'm hoping that its a black baby.

OGC

07-24-2006, 04:49 PM

FUNKMAN wrote: richg0404 wrote: Tenbatsuzen wrote: There's something that isn't right, and I'm entitled to not only opine about it, I'm also entitled to speculate it. You are aboslutely right, you are entitled to opine and speculate all you want, but you aren't entitled to see pictures of the baby unless the parent say so.Britney would love you...    and i think you're rightBritney is another story, she doesn't know how to keep herself or her child out of public view. If the Cruises decide to take little Suri down to the local QuickieMart, they would have nothing to complain about if pictures were taken.

sr71blackbird

07-24-2006, 06:16 PM

<img height="240" src="http://www.sordeo.com/articles/bigimages/batboy.jpg" width="193" border="0" />  Proof!!

Yerdaddy

07-25-2006, 04:16 AM

<img height="197" src="http://cityrag.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/cruise_holmes_baby.jpg" width="462" border="0" />Oh my god! She gave birth to Eric Roberts!

AKA

07-25-2006, 04:24 AM

<img height="202" src="http://www.sensesofcinema.com/images/directors/02/eraserhead.jpg" width="270" border="0" />Jello Biafra is writing a song as we <strike>speak</strike>....type...

docgoblin

07-25-2006, 07:50 PM

I really just think that Tom is pushing the "privacy" issue. I don't think there's anything wrong with the kid. I kind of respect him for not bowing to all the pressure to release pics of his child... Of course I could be wrong and the child could be a waterhead (as per Opie).

JimBeam

07-29-2006, 09:35 AM

The newest  " mouthpiece " is Jada Pincket-Smith, and for whatever reason she's famous I guess for marrying Will Smith who's bit was over 10 years ago.There's an awful lot of " celebrities " that seem to just want to talk about this baby.Its awkward in that there's so much talk about it but no views of it.And obvioulsy all these people wouldnt be talking about it if it didnt exist, and surely the parents deserve their provacy, but it just is very wierd.

Ogre

07-29-2006, 10:08 AM

King Imp

07-29-2006, 10:49 AM

Yeah, I'm so sure that nobodies like Leah Remini and Jaka Pinkett Smith are such good friends with Tom FUCKING Cruise that they would be the only ones to see Suri.

JimBeam

07-29-2006, 11:40 AM

Has there be any talk at all about whether or not Holmes' family has seen the baby ?I mean they've been very vocal about a lot of things in the relationship so I'd think they'd have no problems complaining that they hadnt seen the baby and if they had seen it I would think that any comments they made reagrding it would carry a lot of weight because people dont see them as having the same interests as Cruise.

King Imp

07-29-2006, 05:57 PM

The Scientologists have a habit of making people "disappear" so the Holmes' won't be saying anything anytime soon.

Tenbatsuzen

07-29-2006, 06:22 PM

JimBeam wrote: Has there be any talk at all about whether or not Holmes' family has seen the baby ?I mean they've been very vocal about a lot of things in the relationship so I'd think they'd have no problems complaining that they hadnt seen the baby and if they had seen it I would think that any comments they made reagrding it would carry a lot of weight because people dont see them as having the same interests as Cruise.   Wow, excellent point, I hadn't thought of that. That can point to the baby existing but something's wrong with it.

narc

08-03-2006, 03:05 PM

Someone else says they've seen it, and of course, it's beautiful. <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060803/ap_en_ce/people_penelope_cruz_suri">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060803/ap_en_ce/people_penelope_cruz_suri</a> 
I still smell a rat.

JimBeam

08-05-2006, 09:37 AM

Now you have a 3rd celebrity, who you would think would have no connection at all with a guy she dated 2 years ago and his new wife and alien baby, but she's just happened to have seen the thing ?You'd think w/ all these famous people bumping into the kid there'd be a lot of media around them just for the fact that they are " famous " yet still nobdoy has gotten a glimpse of the ogre-child ?Although I do doubt that many cameras are following Smith or Rehmini nowadays.This is very curious ... and I want answers.Can we claim this kid to be a violation of The Patriot Act so that way we can see it ?

PapaBear

08-05-2006, 12:13 PM

Finally... A pic of Suri has been released.<img height="280" src="http://www.the-net.dk/cute/data/upimages/Raul_Castro_8_12_04.jpg" width="354" border="0" />

mdr55

08-05-2006, 10:14 PM

Suri Cruise........Stem Cells.........hmmmmm.

UnknownPD

09-05-2006, 06:19 PM

Okay here's the pic... is it me or does Suri seem way too old<img height="300" src="http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n67/Chas4604/suri.jpg" width="400" border="0" />

MadMatt

09-05-2006, 06:21 PM

Looks photoshopped.

Don Stugots

09-05-2006, 06:23 PM

that is such a fake photo.

overyoo

09-05-2006, 06:28 PM

There has been alot of fake suri pics out there. Here is the ReaL suri  <img src="http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A9iby4MDMv5EW_8AOa.jzbkF;_ylu=X3oDMTA4NDgyNWN 0BHNlYwNwcm9m/SIG=12ncc0ti9/EXP=1157596035/**http%3a//img54.photobucket.com/albums/v164/Mortimer_Snerd/aorange.jpg" border="0" />

tele7

09-05-2006, 06:36 PM

UnknownPD wrote: Okay here's the pic... is it me or does Suri seem way too old<img height="300" src="http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n67/Chas4604/suri.jpg" width="400" border="0" /><img src="http://the-reelgillman.com/munsters/images/eddie_caddy.jpg" border="0" />

TheGameHHH

09-05-2006, 07:08 PM

yo, that kid is just straight up ugly.

Tenbatsuzen

09-05-2006, 07:34 PM

telecaster7 wrote: UnknownPD wrote: Okay here's the pic... is it me or does Suri seem way too old<img width="400" height="300" border="0" src="http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n67/Chas4604/suri.jpg" /><img border="0" src="http://the-reelgillman.com/munsters/images/eddie_caddy.jpg" />   I was thinking more...  <img width="412" height="500" border="0" src="http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/577/clinthoward1en0.jpg" />

tele7

09-05-2006, 07:40 PM

Note to self:  Ask for an attractive picture of Clint Howard in the Scavenger Hunt thread.

Reephdweller

09-05-2006, 08:08 PM

<img height="373" src="http://www.vanityfair.com/images/main/060906mapr01.jpg" width="260" border="0" />That kid is adoreable! He must've paid a fortune for it!@!

SinA

09-05-2006, 08:16 PM

well, she's got her mom's droopy sloth-eyes and her crazy dad's dumb hair.  i mean that in a cute way.

Fezticle98

09-05-2006, 09:21 PM

Remind anyone of the SNL Baby toupee sketch?http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/179/untitledaz1.png

A.J.

09-06-2006, 04:40 AM

<img height="373" src="http://www.vanityfair.com/images/main/060906mapr01.jpg" width="260" border="0" /> Reminds me of...<img height="419" src="http://img311.imageshack.us/img311/2664/damien028gi.jpg" width="489" border="0" />

King Imp

09-06-2006, 12:03 PM

<a href="http://www.idontlikeyouinthatway.com/pictures/20060906/suri%20cruise/suri2.html" target="_self">Why does this kid look asian?</a>

09-06-2006, 01:06 PM

<img height="373" src="http://www.vanityfair.com/images/main/060906mapr01.jpg" width="260" border="0" />      Really reminds me of... <a href="http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/images/n0/n809.jpg"><img src="http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/images/n0/n809.jpg" border="0" /></a>Q.

SatCam

09-06-2006, 01:59 PM

http://www.vanityfair.com/images/main/060906mapr01.jpg

The bottom half is still attached to Tom

grlNIN

09-06-2006, 02:02 PM

The fuck?Is that hat or...that cannot be real human hair.

SatCam

09-06-2006, 02:05 PM

Is that a baby in your coat or are you just happy to see me?

ShelleBink

09-06-2006, 02:47 PM

Comparing how big Suri is to how big my niece is ((granted, my niece is only 2 1/2 months old)); Suri looks a bit bigger than 4 months and has quite a bit of hair.  Then again, I was a fat baby ((10 lbs, 3 oz at birth)) and looked bigger than I was all the time.

undressa

09-06-2006, 02:48 PM

ok yes the kid looks asain but it is still kinda cute..   I think, right? Vaness

angelinad128

09-06-2006, 02:56 PM

I have never seen a baby that looked like both parents before Suri, she is cute.

dereckfishboy

09-06-2006, 02:59 PM

What the fuck... my daughter is only a few weeks younger and she's got nothing but fucking peach fuzz on her noggin.....

angelinad128

09-06-2006, 03:05 PM

dereckfishboy wrote: What the fuck... my daughter is only a few weeks younger and she's got nothing but fucking peach fuzz on her noggin..... She will be blonde. Only dark haired kids will have hair from day 1.

Snoogans

09-06-2006, 03:07 PM

<img width="400" height="300" border="0" src="http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n67/Chas4604/suri.jpg" /> that kid looks like jeff van gundy

dereckfishboy

09-06-2006, 03:15 PM

angelinad128 wrote: dereckfishboy wrote: What the fuck... my daughter is only a few weeks younger and she's got nothing but fucking peach fuzz on her noggin..... She will be blonde. Only dark haired kids will have hair from day 1.   Hmm.... thanks for the info!

Dirtybird12

09-06-2006, 03:28 PM

Does Suri Cruise exist? Suri does Tom Cruise is straight....Suri is

Gaia

09-06-2006, 03:42 PM

SinA wrote: well, she's got her mom's droopy sloth-eyes and her crazy dad's dumb hair.  i mean that in a cute way. HAHAHA!!! Actually I think she is VERY cute....adorable actually. As for the hair thing, when I was born I had a full head of hair....so thats possible.Of course she exists, how and why would all these famous wierdos be lying about this? That would just be this big weird conspiracy about a baby. Im just wondering why they didnt show her body...whats under that jacket? THAT strikes me as weird. To be honest I just hope the kid is ok...its horrible to see a baby (or anyone) that may have any sort of birth defect etc. All anyone should REALLY be concerned with is the whole "ten fingers ten toes" thing........ but hopefully she is in good health, and the only problem is that her millionaire Daddy is just a fucked up weirdo scientologist, who is using Katie as his; "mid-life crisis".He could also be waiting to cash in on his daughter too....think about how much more pic's etc would be worth if he waited a year....KA CHING!!!!

This message was edited by Gaia on 9-6-06 @ 7:44 PM