View Full Version : ESD sugar over/under
Bossanova
10-02-2006, 05:00 PM
<p>Anyone wanna get an ESD sugar over/under going. We will sat it at 120.</p><p>I say he is under, only because Fezzie pays off less than Dave</p><p><img src='http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m205/Minutebloe/dave.jpg' border=0><br /></p>
<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by Fallon on 10-2-06 @ 10:56 PM</span>
<font size="1">I will take the under also. I have no doubt that there is a ton of sugar in Dave's system, but his body burns it off maintaining his albino glow</font>
sailor
10-02-2006, 05:34 PM
<font size="2">i don't see the merit of them thinking he has diabetes, so put me down for the under as well.<br /></font>
<p>Over...way over. </p><p>After tomorrow's show East Side will be known as "Diabetes Dave." </p>
Dave totally has diabetes. No tolerance whatsoever.<br />
Marc with a c
10-02-2006, 08:15 PM
his blood sugar will come in at 618.
keithy_19
10-02-2006, 08:50 PM
He'll go into diabetic shock and then won't all of you be proud of yourselves. <img src="http://www.ronfez.net/messageboard/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/images/smoke.gif" border="0" />
Mike from Bklyn
10-02-2006, 10:20 PM
<p><span class="postbody">"Diabetes Dave."</span></p><p>Very funny. </p><p> I think he will be over also. </p>
soupcan
10-02-2006, 10:25 PM
look i'aint no doctor or nuthin but isnt there sum kinda of diabetes if you are below that average range of 100-120? Whatever ... dave is NOT in that 100-120 range.<br />
Moving this to the Ron and Fez Forum.
cupcakelove
10-03-2006, 04:18 AM
<strong>soupcan</strong> wrote:<br />look
i'aint no doctor or nuthin but isnt there sum kinda of diabetes if you
are below that average range of 100-120? Whatever ... dave is NOT in
that 100-120 range.<br /><p>Isn't that Type 1 diabetes, which I believe is genetic and you deal with your entire life. Type 2 you get later in life from poor diet and workout habits and causes your levels to go way too high.<br /></p>
cupcakelove
10-03-2006, 04:20 AM
Oh yeah, I'm guessing under. I'm not arguing that Dave isn't on his way to becoming diabetic, but its probably still too early in his life for it to be out of control.<br />
MadMatt
10-03-2006, 05:25 AM
<strong>cupcakelove</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>soupcan</strong> wrote:<br />look i'aint no doctor or nuthin but isnt there sum kinda of diabetes if you are below that average range of 100-120? Whatever ... dave is NOT in that 100-120 range.<br /><p>Isn't that Type 1 diabetes, which I believe is genetic and you deal with your entire life. Type 2 you get later in life from poor diet and workout habits and causes your levels to go way too high.<br /></p><p>Most cases of Type 1 diabetes develop in kids, which is why it is sometimes called Juvenille diabetes, but Type 1 can develop later in life as well - although it is <em>very rare</em>. </p><p>My Mom found out she had Type 1 when she was about 60 years old, although she probably developed it several years earlier. Her doctors had been treating her for Type 2 diabetes but she wasn't responding well. Mom ended up going to an endocrinologist who ran more tests and determined she had, in fact, developed Type 1 diabetes. So, nothing is definite.</p>
Furtherman
10-03-2006, 05:33 AM
<p>He's under.</p><p>Sometimes people just get drunk.</p>
MasterSoySauce
10-03-2006, 05:55 AM
Under.
buckcorncobb
10-03-2006, 06:14 AM
he has too many indications for diabetes....but Dave wil cheat or try to cheat anyway he can
Kurtis9
10-03-2006, 06:40 AM
<p>It is damn hard to go against Ron on any kind of bet especially with Dave. He seems to know that crazy redhead better than Dave knows himself.</p>
Furtherman
10-03-2006, 09:48 AM
Like I said, some people just get drunk.
Skellington
10-03-2006, 09:53 AM
<p>If you are going into Type 1 diabetes, you loose weight at a exponential rate before you are diagnosed. That or you get hospialized. 120 is normal, below that is when you go into hypoglycemia. 60 you are glazed over and act kinda drunk, below that you are doing damage and can possible comatose. Above 120 is hyperglycemia, you pee your brains out, and you are ok until you get over 180. Age and weight affect these, but they are a good rule of thumb. Dave should go for a glucose tolerance test. Glucometer's is a 'now' thing, glucose tolerance gives a spectrum. *shrug*</p><p>Dave should have his prostate examined if he is urinating that much. He'd probably like that too.</p>
JustJon
10-03-2006, 10:19 AM
<p> </p><strong>wbskellington2</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Dave should have his prostate examined if he is urinating that much. He'd probably like that too.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Would you like to snap on the big rubber gloves and perform the check for him? </p>
silas
10-03-2006, 10:20 AM
<strong>wbskellington2</strong> wrote:<br /><p>. Age and weight affect these, but they are a good rule of thumb. Dave should go for a glucose tolerance test. Glucometer's is a 'now' thing, glucose tolerance gives a spectrum. *shrug*</p><p>Dave should have his prostate examined if he is urinating that much. He'd probably like that too.</p><p>Yeah, many indicators to consider, but excess "weight" around the middle is a key one.</p><p>If you develop the "big belly" look (ie-from few photos i've seen, everyone there EXCEPT esd), that is considered an almost definate indicator of a pancreas working overtime, and qualifies as "metabolic syndrome" risk factor, which means very-hi-risk for heart disease.... </p>
stinkbud
10-03-2006, 11:52 AM
Didn't Genna offer a prostate exam to ol' gimp boy? He had an enema tube shoved up there already. <br />
Skellington
10-03-2006, 11:58 AM
<strong>JustJon</strong> wrote:<br /><p> </p><strong>wbskellington2</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Dave should have his prostate examined if he is urinating that much. He'd probably like that too.</p><p>Would you like to snap on the big rubber gloves and perform the check for him? </p><p>are you saying i have big hands?</p>
keithy_19
10-03-2006, 07:02 PM
<p>are you saying i have big hands?</p><p>Well ya kno what they say about people with big hands?</p><p>Big gloves.</p>
Dudeman
10-04-2006, 04:06 AM
<div align="left"><p>im behind a havent heard the last 2 shows. but just so everyone know, there are exact definitions of diabetes. the glucose cuttoff levels depend on how much youve been eatting:</p><p> </p><ul><li>fasting plasma glucose level at or above 126 mg/dL <br /></li><li>plasma glucose at or above 200 mg/dL- two hours after a 75 g oral glucose load in a glucose tolerance test.</li><li>random plasma glucose at or above 200 mg/dL</li></ul><p> </p></div>
Skellington
10-04-2006, 05:39 AM
<strong>Dudeman</strong> wrote:<br />* align="left"> <p>im behind a havent heard the last 2 shows. but just so everyone know, there are exact definitions of diabetes. the glucose cuttoff levels depend on how much youve been eatting:</p><p> </p><ul><li>fasting plasma glucose level at or above 126 mg/dL <br /></li><li>plasma glucose at or above 200 mg/dL- two hours after a 75 g oral glucose load in a glucose tolerance test.</li><li>random plasma glucose at or above 200 mg/dL</li></ul><p> </p><div /><p>Having acute hypoglycemia and bouts of high BS (i'm a random type one, as my pancreas either overfunctions or doesn't function at all, depends on it's mood) and knowing other type ones (because we do herd together you know), each person is different....and what you just posted is sticks for a glucose tolerance. The exact definition of diabetes is: taking your fucking insulin! </p>
Skellington
10-04-2006, 05:40 AM
<strong>keithy_19</strong> wrote:<br /><p> </p>are you saying i have big hands? <p> </p><p>Well ya kno what they say about people with big hands?</p><p>Big gloves.</p><p>That's why they call my index finger 'the violator.'</p>
Dudeman
10-04-2006, 02:08 PM
<p> </p><strong>wbskellington2</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Dudeman</strong> wrote:<br />* align="left"> <p>im behind a havent heard the last 2 shows. but just so everyone know, there are exact definitions of diabetes. the glucose cuttoff levels depend on how much youve been eatting:</p><p> </p><ul><li>fasting plasma glucose level at or above 126 mg/dL <br /></li><li>plasma glucose at or above 200 mg/dL- two hours after a 75 g oral glucose load in a glucose tolerance test.</li><li>random plasma glucose at or above 200 mg/dL</li></ul><p> </p>* /><p>Having acute hypoglycemia and bouts of high BS (i'm a random type one, as my pancreas either overfunctions or doesn't function at all, depends on it's mood) and knowing other type ones (because we do herd together you know), each person is different....and what you just posted is sticks for a glucose tolerance. The exact definition of diabetes is: taking your fucking insulin! </p><p> </p><p>not trying to pick a fight or anything, but having just taken the medicine boards, I can assure you that insulin has nothing to do with the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. in fact type 2 patients initially have increased insulin. for type one, which based on your age and size alone, I assume you have, is associated with decreased insulin. the numbers i posted are what are used for the screening of patients for diabetes mellitus.<br /></p><blockquote /><p> </p>
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.