View Full Version : RF Board teaser, WWE style
Bossanova
02-23-2007, 03:31 PM
I'll set it up. The sounds of galloping horses, the click clack. A guitar riff hits and four men unite. Who can it be. Soon this stable will be unveiled
J.Clints
02-23-2007, 03:34 PM
<p>I think I have a good IDEA. HUMMM</p><p> </p><p><font size="7">4</font></p>
Bossanova
02-23-2007, 03:35 PM
<p><font size="7"></font></p><p><font size="7"></font></p><p><font size="7"> 4</font></p>
Kevin
02-23-2007, 03:36 PM
<font size="6">4</font>
<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by Kevin on 2-23-07 @ 7:37 PM</span>
J.Clints
02-23-2007, 03:36 PM
<p>Best thread ever!</p><p> </p><p> <font size="7"> 4</font></p>
Bossanova
02-23-2007, 03:38 PM
<p>I agree </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><font size="7"></font></p><p><font size="7"> 4</font></p>
J.Clints
02-23-2007, 03:41 PM
Were is AA
Bossanova
02-23-2007, 03:41 PM
<p>Working hard on some sigs I imagine</p><p> </p>
J.Clints
02-23-2007, 03:42 PM
<strong>Bossanova</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Working hard on some sigs I imaginthey will be great</p>
cougarjake13
02-23-2007, 03:44 PM
<p>4</p>
Bossanova
02-23-2007, 03:58 PM
Cougarjake13 is cordially invited to become the manager of the fearcest stable in RF history. The Horseman IIII. We would like his guidence as our manager.
J.Clints
02-23-2007, 04:00 PM
<strong>Bossanova</strong> wrote:<br />Cougarjake13 is cordially invited to become the manager of the fearcest stable in RF history. The Horseman IIII. We would like his guidence as our manager. <p>We could use you to help us take over.</p>
cougarjake13
02-24-2007, 04:26 AM
<strong>jclintsma</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Bossanova</strong> wrote:<br />Cougarjake13 is cordially invited to become the manager of the fearcest stable in RF history. The Horseman IIII. We would like his guidence as our manager. <p>We could use you to help us take over.</p><p>i formally accept and together there will be no one on this board that could stop us</p><p>not even the rock and sock spoon/moe connection </p><p> </p>
Don Stugots
02-24-2007, 05:18 AM
<strong>Bossanova</strong> wrote:<br />Cougarjake13 is cordially invited to become the manager of the fearcest stable in RF history. The Horseman IIII. We would like his guidence as our manager.<p> hmmmmmmm, who could it be.</p>
J.Clints
02-24-2007, 06:26 AM
<strong>cougarjake13</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>jclintsma</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Bossanova</strong> wrote:<br />Cougarjake13 is cordially invited to become the manager of the fearcest stable in RF history. The Horseman IIII. We would like his guidence as our manager. <p>We could use you to help us take over.</p><p>i formally accept and together there will be no one on this board that could stop us</p><p>not even the rock and sock spoon/moe connection </p><p> </p><p>Welcome to the most respected force in the biz.........IIII</p>
Tenbatsuzen
02-24-2007, 06:54 AM
<p>Ripping me off. Sorry.</p><p> </p>
cougarjake13
02-24-2007, 10:20 AM
<strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Ripping me off. Sorry.</p><p> </p><p>we are the new breed, we are the future </p><p>we have control of destiny and control of what's to be </p><p>these are the cold rules of reality</p>
J.Clints
02-24-2007, 10:23 AM
<strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Ripping me off. Sorry.</p><p> </p><p>If you have a problem with the new breed, then go get you ponys and saddle up.</p><p>Bring it on we will take on anyone anytime.</p><p>IIII</p>
<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by jclintsma on 2-24-07 @ 2:24 PM</span>
Don Stugots
02-24-2007, 10:28 AM
<p>the hardcores vs. the new breed? </p><p> </p><p>interesting. </p>
weekapaugjz
02-24-2007, 10:43 AM
<font size="7"> 4</font>
J.Clints
02-24-2007, 10:44 AM
<strong>weekapaugjz</strong> wrote:<br /><font size="7"> 4</font> <p>Great Sig IIII</p><p>Did you finish all of them?</p>
<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by jclintsma on 2-24-07 @ 2:44 PM</span>
weekapaugjz
02-24-2007, 10:45 AM
<strong>jclintsma</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>weekapaugjz</strong> wrote:<br /><font size="7"> 4</font> <p>Great Sig IIII</p><p>Did you finish all of them?</p> <span class="post_edited">This message was edited by jclintsma on 2-24-07 @ 2:44 PM</span><p> yours can be picked up in the lounge</p>
J.Clints
02-24-2007, 10:49 AM
<p>IIII</p><p> </p>
J.Clints
02-24-2007, 10:52 AM
<p>VERY COOL</p>
Kevin
02-24-2007, 02:10 PM
Welcome aboard COUGER! <font size="6"> 4</font>
weekapaugjz
02-24-2007, 02:20 PM
<font size="5">IIII</font>
J.Clints
02-24-2007, 02:21 PM
IIII LOVE IT
Bossanova
02-24-2007, 02:28 PM
<font size="4">IIII</font>
Bossanova
02-24-2007, 02:28 PM
<p>The sigs are awesome</p><p> </p>
weekapaugjz
02-24-2007, 02:30 PM
thanks budday, ill try to put something together for our new manager
Bossanova
02-24-2007, 02:31 PM
Nice, how can I get one of those sigs.
J.Clints
02-24-2007, 02:36 PM
We also have a thread in the lounge check there
Bossanova
02-24-2007, 02:40 PM
<p>Nice</p><p> </p>
weekapaugjz
02-24-2007, 03:03 PM
<p><font size="4">IIII</font></p><p>http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/3193/cougarjakerz6.jpg<br /> </p>
<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by weekapaugjz on 2-24-07 @ 7:03 PM</span>
Tenbatsuzen
02-24-2007, 06:58 PM
<p>Blow me. I did this 2 years ago with Bach, Boogaloo, and Scotch. If anything, you guys are nWo Hollywood... Stugots is Hogan, Bossanova is Scott Norton, and the rest of you are Adams and Bagwell.</p><p> </p>
weekapaugjz
02-24-2007, 07:11 PM
<strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Blow me. I did this 2 years ago with Bach, Boogaloo, and Scotch. If anything, you guys are nWo Hollywood... Stugots is Hogan, Bossanova is Scott Norton, and the rest of you are Adams and Bagwell.</p><p> </p><p> eat a dick</p>
Don Stugots
02-24-2007, 08:19 PM
<strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Blow me. I did this 2 years ago with Bach, Boogaloo, and Scotch. If anything, you guys are nWo Hollywood... Stugots is Hogan, Bossanova is Scott Norton, and the rest of you are Adams and Bagwell.</p><p> </p><p> how did i get dragged into this? i had nothing to do with it other than say "go for it"</p><p> </p><p>Hollywood? more like bischoff</p>
cougarjake13
02-25-2007, 04:04 AM
<strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Blow me. I did this 2 years ago with Bach, Boogaloo, and Scotch. If anything, you guys are nWo Hollywood... Stugots is Hogan, Bossanova is Scott Norton, and the rest of you are Adams and Bagwell.</p><p> </p><p><strong><em><font size="4">WHAT !!!!!</font></em></strong></p><p><strong><em><font size="3"></font></em></strong></p><p><font size="2">I have no idea what you're talking about, if it didnt happen this year it never happened</font></p><p><font size="2">but if you think you got what it takes then i say get together whatever band o jabronies you can muster up and be prepared to get your arses kicked and </font><font size="2">when we're done with you they wont be able to find you in the search function of this board</font></p><p><font size="7"><strong><em>IIII</em></strong></font></p>
J.Clints
02-25-2007, 05:49 AM
<strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Blow me. I did this 2 years ago with Bach, Boogaloo, and Scotch. If anything, you guys are nWo Hollywood... Stugots is Hogan, Bossanova is Scott Norton, and the rest of you are Adams and Bagwell.</p><p> </p><p>We told you yesterday that if you had a problem with it than get your boys together and we will take you out so come on. </p><p>By the way leave DON out of it he has nothing to do with us.</p>
lleeder
02-25-2007, 06:50 AM
<font size="3">Who's your Baby Doll?</font>
Don Stugots
02-25-2007, 06:51 AM
<strong>lleeder</strong> wrote:<br /><font size="3">Who's your Baby Doll?</font><p> Sheepy?</p>
Tenbatsuzen
02-25-2007, 07:20 AM
<p>After reading your posts, you aren't even cool enough to be nWo Hollywood. You're more like Blood Runs Cold.</p><p> </p><p> </p>
Tenbatsuzen
02-25-2007, 07:28 AM
<strong>weekapaugjz</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Blow me. I did this 2 years ago with Bach, Boogaloo, and Scotch. If anything, you guys are nWo Hollywood... Stugots is Hogan, Bossanova is Scott Norton, and the rest of you are Adams and Bagwell.</p><p> </p><p> eat a dick</p><p> </p><p>So I guess that makes you Bagwell?</p><p> </p>
Tenbatsuzen
02-25-2007, 07:33 AM
<p>BTW, you jackals, it's IV, not IIII. IIII doesn't exist in roman numbers.</p><p> </p><p> </p>
weekapaugjz
02-25-2007, 09:33 AM
<strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>After reading your posts, you aren't even cool enough to be nWo Hollywood. You're more like Blood Runs Cold.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> then why are you reading them? hoo hoo, i invented everything... </p>
ralphbxny
02-25-2007, 12:28 PM
<strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>BTW, you jackals, it's IV, not IIII. IIII doesn't exist in roman numbers.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>its the chabugre...makes him smarter and lets you melt coins in your hands!</p>
Bossanova
02-25-2007, 12:40 PM
<strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>BTW, you jackals, it's IV, not IIII. IIII doesn't exist in roman numbers.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Lone Rangers didn't technically work, but Its our thing. Maybe we like the nonconformity of it.</p>
Don Stugots
02-25-2007, 12:44 PM
<strong>Bossanova</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>BTW, you jackals, it's IV, not IIII. IIII doesn't exist in roman numbers.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Lone Rangers didn't technically work, but Its our thing. Maybe we like the nonconformity of it.</p><p> i like that angle. keep it up. </p>
J.Clints
02-25-2007, 12:45 PM
<strong>Don Stugots</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Bossanova</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>BTW, you jackals, it's IV, not IIII. IIII doesn't exist in roman numbers.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Donfather gives his approvel</p><p>The Lone Rangers didn't technically work, but Its our thing. Maybe we like the nonconformity of it.</p><p> i like that angle. keep it up. </p><p> </p>
cougarjake13
02-27-2007, 02:14 AM
i guess no one is gonna step up and try to dethrone our dominance on this board
JustJon
02-27-2007, 09:12 AM
<strong>Bossanova</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>BTW, you jackals, it's IV, not IIII. IIII doesn't exist in roman numbers.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Lone Rangers didn't technically work, but Its our thing. Maybe we like the nonconformity of it.</p><p> How can you pluralize The Lone Ranger?</p>
Don Stugots
02-27-2007, 09:17 AM
<strong>JustJon</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Bossanova</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>BTW, you jackals, it's IV, not IIII. IIII doesn't exist in roman numbers.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Lone Rangers didn't technically work, but Its our thing. Maybe we like the nonconformity of it.</p><p> How can you pluralize The Lone Ranger?</p><p> The Lone Rangerers?</p>
Wallower
02-27-2007, 09:26 AM
<strong>Don Stugots</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>JustJon</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Bossanova</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>BTW, you jackals, it's IV, not IIII. IIII doesn't exist in roman numbers.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Lone Rangers didn't technically work, but Its our thing. Maybe we like the nonconformity of it.</p><p> How can you pluralize The Lone Ranger?</p><p> The Lone Rangerers?</p><p> The Dual Rangers?</p>
ralphbxny
02-27-2007, 10:05 AM
<strong>Wallower</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Don Stugots</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>JustJon</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Bossanova</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>BTW, you jackals, it's IV, not IIII. IIII doesn't exist in roman numbers.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Lone Rangers didn't technically work, but Its our thing. Maybe we like the nonconformity of it.</p><p>How can you pluralize The Lone Ranger?</p><p>The Lone Rangerers?</p><p> The Dual Rangers?</p><p>Topic for next sundays show Don Stu?</p>
J.Clints
02-27-2007, 01:15 PM
<strong>ralphbxny</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Wallower</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Don Stugots</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>JustJon</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Bossanova</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>BTW, you jackals, it's IV, not IIII. IIII doesn't exist in roman numbers.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Lone Rangers didn't technically work, but Its our thing. Maybe we like the nonconformity of it.</p><p>How can you pluralize The Lone Ranger?</p><p>The Lone Rangerers?</p><p> The Dual Rangers?</p><p>Topic for next sundays show Don Stu?</p><p>If this is the next topic Don needs to have all members in studio with him</p>
ChimneyFish
02-27-2007, 02:29 PM
<strong>Wallower</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Don Stugots</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>JustJon</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Bossanova</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Tenbatsuzen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>BTW, you jackals, it's IV, not IIII. IIII doesn't exist in roman numbers.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Lone Rangers didn't technically work, but Its our thing. Maybe we like the nonconformity of it.</p><p>How can you pluralize The Lone Ranger?</p><p>The Lone Rangerers?</p><p> The Dual Rangers?</p><p><strong><em><font face="georgia,palatino" size="2">The Lone Rangeren</font></em></strong></p>
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.