View Full Version : Virginia admits slavery is wrong
IamFogHat
02-24-2007, 05:28 PM
<p>We did it!!! </p><p> </p><p><strong>RICHMOND, Virginia</strong> (AP) -- Meeting on the grounds of the former Confederate Capitol, the Virginia General Assembly voted unanimously Saturday to express "profound regret" for the state's role in slavery.</p><p>Sponsors of the resolution say they know of no other state that has apologized for slavery, although Missouri lawmakers are considering such a measure. The resolution does not carry the weight of law but sends an important symbolic message, supporters said.</p><p>"This session will be remembered for a lot of things, but 20 years hence I suspect one of those things will be the fact that we came together and passed this resolution," said Delegate A. Donald McEachin, a Democrat who sponsored it in the House of Delegates.</p><p> Linky:</p><p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/24/slavery.apology.ap/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/24/slavery.apology.ap/index.html </a></p><p> </p>
Jujubees2
02-24-2007, 06:56 PM
<p><font size="2">Not to be outdone, Maryland is trying to make the display of fake bull testicles illegal.</font></p><p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17302498/"><font size="2">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17302498/</font></a></p>
<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by Jujubees2 on 2-24-07 @ 10:56 PM</span>
torker
02-24-2007, 06:56 PM
<p><em><font size="1"> We now resume our regularly scheduled program already in progress...</font></em></p><p> <img src="http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a201/mydogespresso/hee_haw_cast.jpg" border="0" width="324" height="173" /></p>
Shouldn't this be referred to as the <strong>No Shit Proclaimation of 2007</strong>?
<p> </p><hr width="100%" size="2" />Virginia admits slavery is wrong<br /><hr width="100%" size="2" /><p> </p><p> </p><p>Backpedaling pussies!</p>
Wallower
02-24-2007, 07:56 PM
C'mon guys. Give Virginia a break. It will be at least 70 more years until Misissippi follows suit.
bobrobot
02-24-2007, 07:57 PM
<p><strong><font color="#000080"> On the back of the declaration, in brown crayon, it sez, "but necessary." So that kinda diminishes the spirit of the thing, yes???</font></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><font color="#000080"></font></strong></p>
weekapaugjz
02-24-2007, 07:59 PM
<strong>epo</strong> wrote:<br />Shouldn't this be referred to as the <strong>No Shit Proclaimation of 2007</strong>?<p> exactly, what does this change? nothing, its a bunch of shit.</p>
PapaBear
02-24-2007, 07:59 PM
<strong>Jujubees2</strong> wrote:<br /><p><font size="2">Not to be outdone, Maryland is trying to make the display of fake bull testicles illegal.</font></p><p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17302498/"><font size="2">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17302498/</font></a></p><span class="post_edited">This message was edited by Jujubees2 on 2-24-07 @ 10:56 PM</span> <p>They shouldn't be illegal, but damn I hate those things.</p>
IamFogHat
02-24-2007, 08:02 PM
<strong>weekapaugjz</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>epo</strong> wrote:<br />Shouldn't this be referred to as the <strong>No Shit Proclaimation of 2007</strong>?<p> exactly, what does this change? nothing, its a bunch of shit.</p><p> Thank you. Exactly. This should have been a formality (though a sincere one) about a hundred and fifty years ago. </p>
PapaBear
02-24-2007, 08:14 PM
It does seam to be a useless proclamation, but it's somehow worse that this comes up every so often in Congress, and they still refuse to do it.
weekapaugjz
02-24-2007, 08:20 PM
<strong>PapaBear</strong> wrote:<br />It does seam to be a useless proclamation, but it's somehow worse that this comes up every so often in Congress, and they still refuse to do it.<p> they should refuse it, what does this congress have anything to do with an institution which was abolished over 140 years ago?</p>
PapaBear
02-24-2007, 08:23 PM
<p>The reason I think it should be passed nationally is because it would hurt nothing and make at least a few people happy. The current Congress has nothing to do with what happened back then, but it would be saying, "we as a nation, are ashamed of the way our nation acted back then". By refusing the legislation, it's like saying, "we don't give a damn what you think about the things we did in the past".</p><p>PS. I still hate those damn fake bull balls.</p>
<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by PapaBear on 2-25-07 @ 12:24 AM</span>
weekapaugjz
02-24-2007, 08:25 PM
<strong>PapaBear</strong> wrote:<br />The reason I think it should be passed nationally is because it would hurt nothing and make at least a few people happy. The current Congress has nothing to do with what happened back then, but it would be saying, "we as a nation, are ashamed of the way our nation acted back then". By refusing the legislation, it's like saying, "we don't give a damn what you think about the things we did in the past".<p> so you are for putting things through congress that are a complete waste of time and resources which will effectively have no change on anything? i dont want to come across as a bigot at all in this thread but shit like this is a waste of time. </p>
PapaBear
02-24-2007, 08:28 PM
I agree that it's a waste of time to do most of these types of things, but they bring it up just about every year. We should just apologize and get it over with. And don't worry. I don't think you're a bigot.
bobrobot
02-24-2007, 08:34 PM
<strong>Jujubees2</strong> wrote:<br /><p><font size="2">Not to be outdone, Maryland is trying to make the display of fake bull testicles illegal.</font></p><p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17302498/"><font size="2">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17302498/</font></a></p><p><span class="post_edited">This message was edited by Jujubees2 on 2-24-07 @ 10:56 PM</span> </p><p><strong><font color="#000080">Problem is... The bulls make so much goddam noise when ya tie the real ones to yer trailer hitch!!!</font></strong></p><p> </p>
Jaysin
02-24-2007, 08:35 PM
<p>that sparkling wiggle may get his 40 acres and a mule yet!!! </p><p> between this new development and him producing an awesome live event </p><p>the world must be ending.</p> <span class="post_edited"></span>
<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by Jaysin on 2-25-07 @ 12:37 AM</span>
weekapaugjz
02-24-2007, 08:39 PM
<strong>Jaysin</strong> wrote:<br /><p>that sparkling wiggle may get his 40 acres and a mule yet!!! </p><p> between this new development and him producing an awesome live event </p><p>the world must be ending.</p> <span class="post_edited"></span> <span class="post_edited">This message was edited by Jaysin on 2-25-07 @ 12:37 AM</span><p> there's too many sparkling wiggles at the party</p>
IamFogHat
02-24-2007, 08:44 PM
<strong>Jaysin</strong> wrote:<br /><p>that sparkling wiggle may get his 40 acres and a mule yet!!! </p><p> between this new development and him producing an awesome live event </p><p>the world must be ending.</p> <span class="post_edited"></span> <span class="post_edited">This message was edited by Jaysin on 2-25-07 @ 12:37 AM</span><p> I think you're joking but if you're not, go to hell. And weekapaugjz, do you understand how much "bullshit" they pass every day in congress? At least this one is relevant and helpful. </p><p>And btw I don't find this to be bullshit, just well overdue. </p>
weekapaugjz
02-24-2007, 08:51 PM
<strong>IamFogHat</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Jaysin</strong> wrote:<br /><p>that sparkling wiggle may get his 40 acres and a mule yet!!! </p><p> between this new development and him producing an awesome live event </p><p>the world must be ending.</p> <span class="post_edited"></span> <span class="post_edited">This message was edited by Jaysin on 2-25-07 @ 12:37 AM</span><p> I think you're joking but if you're not, go to hell. And weekapaugjz, do you understand how much "bullshit" they pass every day in congress? At least this one is <span style="background-color: #ffff00">relevant and helpful.</span> </p><p>And btw I don't find this to be bullshit, just well overdue. </p><p> how is it helpful and what does it change?</p>
reeshy
02-24-2007, 08:55 PM
WOW...is slavery still wrong?????
Jaysin
02-24-2007, 08:56 PM
<strong>weekapaugjz</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>IamFogHat</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Jaysin</strong> wrote:<br /><p>that sparkling wiggle may get his 40 acres and a mule yet!!! </p><p> between this new development and him producing an awesome live event </p><p>the world must be ending.</p> <span class="post_edited"></span> <span class="post_edited">This message was edited by Jaysin on 2-25-07 @ 12:37 AM</span><p> I think you're joking but if you're not, go to hell. And weekapaugjz, do you understand how much "bullshit" they pass every day in congress? At least this one is <span style="background-color: #ffff00">relevant and helpful.</span> </p><p>And btw I don't find this to be bullshit, just well overdue. </p><p> how is it helpful and what does it change?</p><p> you're old.....of course i'm joking. </p>
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.