View Full Version : Fucking bigmouth celebrities!
Yerdaddy
02-27-2007, 11:38 PM
<h1><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/27/AR2007022701161.html" target="_blank">Justice for Darfur</a><font size="2"> </font></h1><h1><font size="2">By Angelina Jolie <p>Wednesday, February 28, 2007; Page A19 </p><p><font size="1" style="background-color: #ffff00">Angelina Jolie is giving a brief introduction to the Darfur crisis (genocide) and her opinion on the issue of whether the ICC should be supported in pursuing charges against the bad guys. (And I'm calling for the ICC to bring charges against the person responsible for me not being able to fix the fucking formatting.)</font></p></font></h1><p>[quote]BAHAI, Chad -- Here, at this refugee camp on the border of Sudan, nothing separates us from Darfur but a small stretch of desert and a line on a map. All the same, it's a line I can't cross. As a representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, I have traveled into Darfur before, and I had hoped to return. But the UNHCR has told me that this camp, Oure Cassoni, is as close as I can get. <br />Sticking to this side of the Sudanese border is supposed to keep me safe. By every measure -- killings, rapes, the burning and looting of villages -- the violence in Darfur has increased since my last visit, in 2004. The death toll has passed 200,000; in four years of fighting, Janjaweed militia members have driven 2.5 million people from their homes, including the 26,000 refugees crowded into Oure Cassoni.</p><p>Attacks on aid workers are rising, another reason I was told to stay out of Darfur. By drawing attention to their heroic work -- their efforts to keep refugees alive, to keep camps like this one from being consumed by chaos and fear -- I would put them at greater risk. </p>Until the killers and their sponsors are prosecuted and punished, violence will continue on a massive scale. Ending it may well require military action. But accountability can also come from international tribunals, measuring the perpetrators against international standards of justice. <p>Accountability is a powerful force. It has the potential to change behavior -- to check aggression by those who are used to acting with impunity. Luis Moreno-Ocampo, chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), has said that genocide is not a crime of passion; it is a calculated offense. He's right. When crimes against humanity are punished consistently and severely, the killers' calculus will change.</p><p>On Monday I asked a group of refugees about their needs. Better tents, said one; better access to medical facilities, said another. Then a teenage boy raised his hand and said, with powerful simplicity, "Nous voulons une épreuve." <em>We want a trial</em>. He is why I am encouraged by the ICC's announcement yesterday that it will prosecute a former Sudanese minister of state and a Janjaweed leader on charges of crimes against humanity.</p><p>Some critics of the ICC have said indictments could make the situation worse. The threat of prosecution gives the accused a reason to keep fighting, they argue. Sudanese officials have echoed this argument, saying that the ICC's involvement, and the implication of their own eventual prosecution, is why they have refused to allow U.N. peacekeepers into Darfur.</p><p>It is not clear, though, why we should take Khartoum at its word. And the notion that the threat of ICC indictments has somehow exacerbated the problem doesn't make sense, given the history of the conflict. Khartoum's claims aside, would we in America ever accept the logic that we shouldn't prosecute murderers because the threat of prosecution might provoke them to continue killing?</p><p>When I was in Chad in June 2004, refugees told me about systematic attacks on their villages. It was estimated then that more than 1,000 people were dying each week.</p><p>In October 2004 I visited West Darfur, where I heard horrific stories, including accounts of gang-rapes of mothers and
Doctor Z
02-27-2007, 11:53 PM
<strong>Yerdaddy</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Fucking bigmouth celebrities!</strong><br /><span class="post_edited"></span><p><img src="http://www.exposay.com/celebrity-photos2/julia-roberts-gets-new-potty-skill-ZuD.jpg" border="0" width="275" height="340" /> <img src="http://www.cnn.com/SHOWBIZ/News/9902/26/showbuzz/steven.tyler.jpg" border="0" /> </p>
<p><img src="http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/8573/hungryax2.jpg" border="0" /></p><p>TONY ROBBINS HUNGRY. </p>
Judge Smails
02-28-2007, 04:58 AM
<p><img src="http://www.palletmastersworkshop.com/images/raye.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="255" /></p><p>"Hi. I'm Martha Raye - The Big Mouth."</p><p>There is no fucking way I'm reading any of that post this early in the morning.</p><p> </p>
Yerdaddy
02-28-2007, 06:31 AM
<strong>Judge Smails</strong> wrote:<br /><p><img src="http://www.palletmastersworkshop.com/images/raye.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="255" /></p><p>"Hi. I'm Martha Raye - The Big Mouth."</p><p>There is no fucking way I'm reading any of that post this early in the morning.</p><p> </p><p>But you can take the time to find a photo of some forgotten movie star from the 50s with a big ol fucking mouth this early in the morning? You know guys, there are millions of people who's lives have been devistated by this conflict and you guys just want to make this thread about pictures of celebrities with... </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><img src="http://www.ronfez.net/messageboard/images/member_avatars/83874animation18of[1]2.gif" border="0" width="100" height="78" /> <font size="5">JEEZUZ FUCKING CHRIST THAT'S HOT!!!</font></p><p>I'm going to have to sit here for the next 15 minutes staring at that until the meter on this internet cafe computer runs out and the screen goes blank. Then I'll have to walk back to my hotel with a fucking pup-tent in my skirt so I can wack off in my room. Those are bad girls! <em>Bad girls!</em></p>
AgnosticJihad
02-28-2007, 06:33 AM
<p>Celebrities, like all citizens in a democratic society, are and should be fully allowed to speak thier minds on political and social issues. I can only assume that people get angry at celebrities because they can use thier fame to get thier opinions recognized, or that people simply get angry because they disagree with the views of the celebrity in question.</p><p>I find it interesting that the only celebrities who seem to get criticized for speaking thier minds are those whose views are of the liberal/left wing orientation. Rarely do I hear people tell right-wingers like Ted Nugent to shut up and keep thier political opinions to themselves. Furthermore, there is a whole group of celebrities who have achieved this status by expressing thier political views (Rush Limbaugh, Shawn Hannity, Bill O'Rielly, and thousands of other pundits) who are, amazingly enough, predominantly right-wing!</p><p>Peopel shouldn't get angry at celebrities simply for expressing thier opinions. If you disagree with them, fine. But everyone has the right to express themselves.</p>
bobrobot
02-28-2007, 06:36 AM
<p><strong><font color="#000080">Joe E. Brown, HEYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!</font></strong></p><p><img src="http://www.nndb.com/people/905/000091632/joeebrown02.jpg" border="0" width="225" height="288" /></p>
Yerdaddy
02-28-2007, 06:36 AM
<p>Carly Simon</p><p><img src="http://www.msgphoto.com/music1/carly.jpg" border="0" width="432" height="532" /></p><p>I think I just found that little Kintner Boy.</p>
Golfman
02-28-2007, 06:41 AM
She needs to quit yapping and put some food in that piehole, she's starting to be grossskinny
Furtherman
02-28-2007, 06:44 AM
<strong>AgnosticJihad</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Celebrities, like all citizens in a democratic society, are and should be fully allowed to speak thier minds on political and social issues. I can only assume that people get angry at celebrities because they can use thier fame to get thier opinions recognized, or that people simply get angry because they disagree with the views of the celebrity in question.</p><p>I find it interesting that the only celebrities who seem to get criticized for speaking thier minds are those whose views are of the liberal/left wing orientation. Rarely do I hear people tell right-wingers like Ted Nugent to shut up and keep thier political opinions to themselves. Furthermore, there is a whole group of celebrities who have achieved this status by expressing thier political views (Rush Limbaugh, Shawn Hannity, Bill O'Rielly, and thousands of other pundits) who are, amazingly enough, predominantly right-wing!</p><p>Peopel shouldn't get angry at celebrities simply for expressing thier opinions. If you disagree with them, fine. But everyone has the right to express themselves.</p><p>Well said!</p><p> </p><p>I think Jolie is doing good work. Bringing attention to Darfur is more important than her making Tomb Raider 3. </p><p>When it comes to celebrities saying that person is bad and you should vote for this person, then they should shut up. It's not like one person is advocating genocide and another isn't. When it comes to electing officals, we can make up our own minds. When it comes to genocide in another country, sometimes we do need to be taught. Angelina Jolie is doing just that, teaching us. </p>
<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by Furtherman on 2-28-07 @ 10:47 AM</span>
Dan 'Hampton
02-28-2007, 06:45 AM
Ted Nuggent doesn't get crap for his views? Where do you live?
Yerdaddy
02-28-2007, 06:48 AM
<p><img src="http://www.ronfez.net/messageboard/images/member_avatars/83874animation18of[1]2.gif" border="0" alt="Judge Smails and his brother!" title="Judge Smails and his brother!" width="100" height="78" /> FUCK! And I still got 8 more coins in my pocket! Damn you Smails!</p>
Dan 'Hampton
02-28-2007, 06:48 AM
<img src="http://www.exposednuptials.com/uploaded_images/bottomtooth-772504.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="200" />
Judge Smails
02-28-2007, 06:54 AM
<strong>Yerdaddy</strong> wrote:<br /><p><img src="http://www.ronfez.net/messageboard/images/member_avatars/83874animation18of[1]2.gif" border="0" alt="Judge Smails and his brother!" title="Judge Smails and his brother!" width="100" height="78" /> FUCK! And I still got 8 more coins in my pocket! Damn you Smails!</p><p> I just love to spread the joy.</p><p><img src="http://x4.putfile.com/9/25223300665.gif" border="0" width="200" height="150" /><img src="http://x4.putfile.com/9/25304033053.gif" border="0" width="200" height="150" /></p><p><img src="http://www.btinternet.com/~shadow.moses/Gifs-Babes/Aria.gif" border="0" width="160" height="157" /><img src="http://images.dr3vil.com/files2/default/post2228311431974453gk.gif" border="0" width="110" height="97" /><img src="http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/8283/fir2yv7.gif" border="0" width="220" height="165" /></p>
Yerdaddy
02-28-2007, 06:55 AM
<strong>Furtherman</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>AgnosticJihad</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Celebrities, like all citizens in a democratic society, are and should be fully allowed to speak thier minds on political and social issues. I can only assume that people get angry at celebrities because they can use thier fame to get thier opinions recognized, or that people simply get angry because they disagree with the views of the celebrity in question.</p><p>I find it interesting that the only celebrities who seem to get criticized for speaking thier minds are those whose views are of the liberal/left wing orientation. Rarely do I hear people tell right-wingers like Ted Nugent to shut up and keep thier political opinions to themselves. Furthermore, there is a whole group of celebrities who have achieved this status by expressing thier political views (Rush Limbaugh, Shawn Hannity, Bill O'Rielly, and thousands of other pundits) who are, amazingly enough, predominantly right-wing!</p><p>Peopel shouldn't get angry at celebrities simply for expressing thier opinions. If you disagree with them, fine. But everyone has the right to express themselves.</p><p>Well said!</p><p> </p><p>I think Jolie is doing good work. Bringing attention to Darfur is more important than her making Tomb Raider 3. </p><p>When it comes to celebrities saying that person is bad and you should vote for this person, then they should shut up. It's not like one person is advocating genocide and another isn't. When it comes to electing officals, we can make up our own minds. When it comes to genocide in another country, sometimes we do need to be taught. Angelina Jolie is doing just that, teaching us. </p><span class="post_edited">This message was edited by Furtherman on 2-28-07 @ 10:47 AM</span> <p>I agree completely. Excellent post. However, I think you must have clicked the "post message" button before you had finished and when I first read it it said:</p><p></p><p>Well said!</p><p> </p><p>I think Jolie is doing good work. Bringing attention to</p><p>which I thought was funny as hell. Now it's even funnier!</p><p>You get this:</p><p><img src="http://www.ronfez.net/messageboard/images/member_avatars/83874animation18of[1]2.gif" border="0" alt="Don't ever stop!" title="Don't ever stop!" width="100" height="78" /></p>
AgnosticJihad
02-28-2007, 07:04 AM
<strong>Furtherman</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>AgnosticJihad</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Celebrities, like all citizens in a democratic society, are and should be fully allowed to speak thier minds on political and social issues. I can only assume that people get angry at celebrities because they can use thier fame to get thier opinions recognized, or that people simply get angry because they disagree with the views of the celebrity in question.</p><p>I find it interesting that the only celebrities who seem to get criticized for speaking thier minds are those whose views are of the liberal/left wing orientation. Rarely do I hear people tell right-wingers like Ted Nugent to shut up and keep thier political opinions to themselves. Furthermore, there is a whole group of celebrities who have achieved this status by expressing thier political views (Rush Limbaugh, Shawn Hannity, Bill O'Rielly, and thousands of other pundits) who are, amazingly enough, predominantly right-wing!</p><p>Peopel shouldn't get angry at celebrities simply for expressing thier opinions. If you disagree with them, fine. But everyone has the right to express themselves.</p><p>Well said!</p><p> </p><p>I think Jolie is doing good work. Bringing attention to Darfur is more important than her making Tomb Raider 3. </p><p>When it comes to celebrities saying that person is bad and you should vote for this person, then they should shut up. It's not like one person is advocating genocide and another isn't. When it comes to electing officals, we can make up our own minds. When it comes to genocide in another country, sometimes we do need to be taught. Angelina Jolie is doing just that, teaching us. </p><span class="post_edited">This message was edited by Furtherman on 2-28-07 @ 10:47 AM</span> <p>I agree when it comes to telling people who they should vote for, which is why pundits should eat shit and die. </p>
AgnosticJihad
02-28-2007, 07:08 AM
<strong>dschef</strong> wrote:<br />Ted Nuggent doesn't get crap for his views? Where do you live? <p>Prehaps Nugent does get crap where you live, but I live in the Midwest, and around here he does not get criticized. Not publicly, at least. I cannot personally recall ever hearing him publicly criticized in the media. Prehaps he does, but not that I know of.</p>
Yerdaddy
02-28-2007, 07:15 AM
<strong>Judge Smails</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Yerdaddy</strong> wrote:<br /><p><img src="http://www.ronfez.net/messageboard/images/member_avatars/83874animation18of[1]2.gif" border="0" alt="Judge Smails and his brother!" title="Judge Smails and his brother!" width="100" height="78" /> FUCK! And I still got 8 more coins in my pocket! Damn you Smails!</p><p> I just love to spread the joy.</p><p><img src="http://x4.putfile.com/9/25223300665.gif" border="0" width="200" height="150" /><img src="http://x4.putfile.com/9/25304033053.gif" border="0" width="200" height="150" /></p><p><img src="http://www.btinternet.com/~shadow.moses/Gifs-Babes/Aria.gif" border="0" width="160" height="157" /><img src="http://images.dr3vil.com/files2/default/post2228311431974453gk.gif" border="0" width="110" height="97" /><img src="http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/8283/fir2yv7.gif" border="0" width="220" height="165" /></p><p>You're a bad person.</p>
sailor
02-28-2007, 07:22 AM
<strong>AgnosticJihad</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>dschef</strong> wrote:<br />Ted Nuggent doesn't get crap for his views? Where do you live? <p>Prehaps Nugent does get crap where you live, but I live in the Midwest, and around here he does not get criticized. Not publicly, at least. I cannot personally recall ever hearing him publicly criticized in the media. Prehaps he does, but not that I know of.</p><p> <font size="2">i've never heard anyone take ted seriously. he's a kook.</font></p><p><font size="2">and how about eleanor clift for a liberal pundit? and i agree with the previous posts saying i have no problem with this but i don't want some actor/actress/singer telling me who to vote for.</font> </p>
AgnosticJihad
02-28-2007, 07:37 AM
<strong>sailor</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>AgnosticJihad</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>dschef</strong> wrote:<br />Ted Nuggent doesn't get crap for his views? Where do you live? <p>Prehaps Nugent does get crap where you live, but I live in the Midwest, and around here he does not get criticized. Not publicly, at least. I cannot personally recall ever hearing him publicly criticized in the media. Prehaps he does, but not that I know of.</p><p> <font size="2">i've never heard anyone take ted seriously. he's a kook.</font></p><p><font size="2">and how about eleanor clift for a liberal pundit? and i agree with the previous posts saying i have no problem with this but i don't want some actor/actress/singer telling me who to vote for.</font> </p><p>As I said before, you don't live in the Midwest. People do take Nugent and his ilk seriously around here. As for the liberal pundit thing, I said pundits who achieve celebrity status are PREDOMINANTLY right-wing, not exclusively right-wing (and I must admit I've never heard of Eleanor Clift). But, political orientation has nothing to do with my distaste for punditry. I simply prefer to make up my own mind on issues without being told by someone else what to think or how to vote.</p><p>But fuck this! I played hookey from work today so I could smoke pot and jack off to internet porn, not post messages all day. Damn you RonFez.net! You are the new bane of my existence!</p>
<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by AgnosticJihad on 2-28-07 @ 11:42 AM</span>
badmonkey
02-28-2007, 05:29 PM
<p><strong>I'm confused. If the UN stops the killing in Darfur, do the girls stop kissing or kiss more?</strong></p><p>Nevermind... the UN won't do anything here just like they didn't do anything in Rwanda.</p><p>Does the USA wait for the UN to say "ok...we give you our permission to go stop this" or do we again say fuck the UN and just go take care of it. </p><p>And if we do say fuck the UN and go take care of it, will we as a country allow our military to see it through? Will we let the military run the war or will we armchair quarterback it from congress?</p><p>I think the big question is what is taking the UN so long to admit that the genocide going on there is in fact genocide and do something about it? </p><p>Interesting point Yerdaddy brings up tho about celebrities. We do seem to cheer them when they agree with us and tell them to shut up when they don't. Weird... we agree on something...</p><p> <img src="http://www.ronfez.net/messageboard/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/images/ohmy.gif" border="0" /> </p><p> </p><p>Badmonkey </p>
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.