View Full Version : Should Earl Spend More On Obama Then Jesus?
lleeder
02-14-2008, 05:05 PM
Earl gave the Obama campaign 100 dollars but he tithes 10 percent of his salary to the church. I think that money would be better spent helping to elect Obama. If Earl loves Obama so much he should put Jesus on the back burner til Obamas elected. I give to neither but thats my opinion.
furie
02-14-2008, 05:29 PM
Obama needs the money more than Jesus does.
patsopinion
02-14-2008, 05:44 PM
poll
donnie_darko
02-14-2008, 05:46 PM
i don't think jesus wants earls "poll" either you fucking pervert.
question: would earl leave his socks on while giving jesus the "poll"
hmm.
DoubleJ
02-14-2008, 05:50 PM
Yes, but he need not contribute more than $100 to the Obama campaign to achieve the correct balance. He should just stop giving money to Jesus altogether.
earthbrown
02-14-2008, 06:00 PM
The Jesus story is more likely to have been true, than Obama having a shot at the presidency.
K
conman823
02-14-2008, 06:27 PM
Giving money to your church is proof that theres an idiot born every minute.
Giving money to candidates is giving money to the rich. Why would a working class joe wanna give money to the rich? This country makes my head hurt.
Also Obama collects a Senators salary provided by the tax payers......then takes more money from taxpayers. WTF? I wish my boss would give me some extra money for no good reason.
cupcakelove
02-14-2008, 06:30 PM
According to Bill, they're both fairy tales.
Devo37
02-14-2008, 06:36 PM
Should Earl Spend More On Obama Then Jesus?
"Should Earl Spend More On Obama Than Jesus?"
sorry, had to fix that.
Giving money to your church is proof that theres an idiot born every minute.
Giving money to candidates is giving money to the rich. Why would a working class joe wanna give money to the rich? This country makes my head hurt.
Also Obama collects a Senators salary provided by the tax payers......then takes more money from taxpayers. WTF? I wish my boss would give me some extra money for no good reason.
So on a $169K /year salary, a US Senator like McCain, Clinton or Obama is supposed to run a presidential campaign out of pocket?
You simply don't understand what you are talking about.
TONYTIGER
02-14-2008, 07:32 PM
Earl gave the Obama campaign 100 dollars but he tithes 10 percent of his salary to the church. I think that money would be better spent helping to elect Obama. If Earl loves Obama so much he should put Jesus on the back burner til Obamas elected. I give to neither but thats my opinion.
obama, because jesus would understand.
:thumbup:
Recyclerz
02-14-2008, 07:39 PM
Giving to Jesus is tax deductible.
Giving to Obama gets you lots of e-mail. :blink:
conman823
02-14-2008, 09:22 PM
So on a $169K /year salary, a US Senator like McCain, Clinton or Obama is supposed to run a presidential campaign out of pocket?
You simply don't understand what you are talking about.
And you simply subscribe to whatever these people tell you.
Call me a traditionalist but if you can't get by on that salary AND $$ taken in the back door from lobbiests and special interest groups then you know what? Don't run for president. BTW, poor old broke Hillary dug up 5Mill from her own pocket GOOD FOR HER.
Its poeple like YOU who support status quo government, which is ruining this country. Go ahead throw away your hard earned cash to support the upper 5% of this country, when the president should be selected from the people not from corrupt government.
ToddEVF
02-14-2008, 09:40 PM
Should Earl Spend More On Obama Then Jesus?
Hmm. . . So we are voting on whether Earl should spend more on Obama, then Jesus? Since when has Jesus played second fiddle to any of the followers of the many sects of Christianity?
Jesus can can miracle some cash. Or make bills and debt disappear.
To my knowledge, Obama has no such powers.
Raskolnikov
02-15-2008, 05:20 AM
The poll results are absolutely -- as they say -- 'LOL' funny.
But yes, definitely more on Jesus.
Is Jesus running for President?
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.