You must set the ad_network_ads.txt file to be writable (check file name as well).
10,000 B.C. - the new 300 [Archive] - RonFez.net Messageboard

Log in

View Full Version : 10,000 B.C. - the new 300


thepaulo
03-05-2008, 06:20 PM
It's epic....and silly......
much like 300.

ZigZagBigBag
03-05-2008, 06:47 PM
stick to Ratatouille, Gap man.

thepaulo
03-05-2008, 06:50 PM
There is no New Ratatouille........yet!

thepaulo
03-06-2008, 11:20 PM
One problem with 10,000 B.C. is there is absolutely no evidence of massive pyramids constucted in that year...or for few thousand years hence.

patsopinion
03-07-2008, 12:27 AM
stop being silly
the aliens built the mayan pyramids in 12,000 bc

that chick looks super hot from the previews
do we see nips?

Chigworthy
03-07-2008, 06:03 AM
I thought the world began in 4000 BC?

Serioulsy though, the only reason to see a shite-boat like this is for the visual effects, and they look like shit on the commercial. The stuffed-animal saber-tooth and the douchey hero aren't even looking each other in the eye in that "staredown" scene. I give a fuck about the director of Independence Day. Fuck off, Hollywood.

Dirtybird12
03-07-2008, 06:04 AM
Do the special FX look as bad on the big screen as they do on TV?

With a movie like this...that relies on special FX - I think they should've/could've done a better job. From what I've seen on TV it looks pretty fake.

edit - chigworthy and I had the same thought at the same time. weird

Chigworthy
03-07-2008, 06:23 AM
edit - chigworthy and I had the same thought at the same time. weird

You don't know how much that scares me.

King Hippos Bandaid
03-07-2008, 06:28 AM
I hope the Academy Award goes to an Elephant, I heard they did a great job in portraying a Wolly Mamath

cougarjake13
03-07-2008, 01:38 PM
ill check it out but only if its at the matinee price

drjoek
03-07-2008, 01:42 PM
About the only reason to see the movie would be

Camilla Belle
http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/1273/01ee5.jpg

cougarjake13
03-07-2008, 01:47 PM
About the only reason to see the movie would be

Camilla Belle
http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/1273/01ee5.jpg

thats one hell of a good reason though

Chigworthy
03-07-2008, 02:24 PM
I can see plenty of hot tits without being demeaned by formulaic rubbish. Eat a rusty ass, Hollywood.

thepaulo
03-07-2008, 07:30 PM
Camilla Belle doesn't show her hot tits....sorry.....she shows a nice set of eyebrows though.

JustJon
03-08-2008, 12:45 PM
There is no New Ratatouille........yet!

Wall*E. 'nuff said.

Bay Ridge Tim
03-08-2008, 01:56 PM
One problem with 10,000 B.C. is there is absolutely no evidence of massive pyramids constucted in that year...or for few thousand years hence.

Here's another problem: it was made by talentless hacks and it looks like crap.

fezident
03-08-2008, 06:46 PM
Will this craptastic movie be nominated for BEST ANIMATED FEATURE next year?

scottinnj
03-09-2008, 03:39 PM
One problem with 10,000 B.C. is there is absolutely no evidence of massive pyramids constucted in that year...or for few thousand years hence.

God made them, ask Earl next time you're on the program Paul-O

Chigworthy
03-10-2008, 10:12 AM
B.C. stands for bad cinema at the oscars!!!!A geh, ge geh, ge geh geh geh. Ge geh.

The Jays
03-10-2008, 05:36 PM
BC stand for Before Crap, meaning, before crap came out of man's asshole, movies like this came out.