You must set the ad_network_ads.txt file to be writable (check file name as well).
tag purgatory [Archive] - RonFez.net Messageboard

Log in

View Full Version : tag purgatory


DiabloSammich
06-18-2008, 01:44 PM
Since we can't tag other people's threads anymore, dump all your brilliant tags here. Put the stupid ones here, too. Most of us won't know the difference. I'll start.




dmm pwns tom cruise

esd assburgers

another thread from a racist

King Hippos Bandaid
06-18-2008, 01:46 PM
worse thread then pmaphone

RhinoinMN
06-18-2008, 01:55 PM
Marc with a c spin off

drjoek
06-18-2008, 02:06 PM
Heres a question
What exactly is the point of tags?
They were added as a new featurein 2.0 and we abused those priveledge and were taken away except for the mods or thread starter. Fine I understand that BUT if we have tags and there is no list to chose from then all you have is a bunch of random tags that don't go anywhere.

For Example
If you click on a tag it will bring you all the threads that have that tag, but since all tags are just random saying if you click on the tag all you will get is the one thread that has that tag the one your looking at already. I think they were a funny thing that we abused but that is better then tags that don't do a damn thing.
Try clicking on a tag at the bottom of a thread and see if Im right
I say dump em

RhinoinMN
06-18-2008, 02:07 PM
Heres a question
What exactly is the point of tags?
They were added as a new featurein 2.0 and we abused those priveledge and were taken away except for the mods or thread starter. Fine I understand that BUT if we have tags and there is no list to chose from then all you have is a bunch of random tags that don't go anywhere.

For Example
If you click on a tag it will bring you all the threads that have that tag, but since all tags are just random saying if you click on the tag all you will get is the one thread that has that tag the one your looking at already. I think they were a funny thing that we abused but that is better then tags that don't do a damn thing.
Try clicking on a tag at the bottom of a thread and see if Im right
I say dump em

Please don't lump me in with those deviants.

my answer to the question:
I think that it makes the search process more efficient.??

drjoek
06-18-2008, 02:10 PM
Please don't lump me in with those deviants.


I think that it makes the search process more efficient.??

I was one of the deviants who abused it, but if you read my point there how does it make it more efficient if there are no list of tags?
There just random tags that aren't related.If you don't have a list to work with there will never be any structured search.
Try clicking the tags at the bottom what do you get= this thread
Useless

midwestjeff
06-18-2008, 02:11 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/images/238741/0_61_111106_elton_john.jpg

underdog
06-18-2008, 02:19 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/images/238741/0_61_111106_elton_john.jpg

Tag purgatory. He said tag.

RhinoinMN
06-18-2008, 02:22 PM
I was one of the deviants who abused it, but if you read my point there how does it make it more efficient if there are no list of tags?
There just random tags that aren't related.If you don't have a list to work with there will never be any structured search.
Try clicking the tags at the bottom what do you get= this thread
Useless
If you search by tags and type whatever it is that you are searching for it may or may not direct you to what you want.

But I completely understand your point. They really don't do much unless someone can explain what I don't get.





Deviant.:devil2:

DiabloSammich
06-18-2008, 02:24 PM
worse thread then pmaphone



Worse than pmaphone?

That will be my most epic fail ever. And that's in a long list.


I can't wait to see how this turns out.

Dougie Brootal
06-18-2008, 02:31 PM
I was one of the deviants who abused it, but if you read my point there how does it make it more efficient if there are no list of tags?
There just random tags that aren't related.If you don't have a list to work with there will never be any structured search.
Try clicking the tags at the bottom what do you get= this thread
Useless

lets say youre looking for a thread about asian trannys but cant remember the title of said thread, all you need is to type douggrasso or scot in the tag box.

Dougie Brootal
06-18-2008, 02:34 PM
drjoek has bad breath
sammich is a genius
douggrasso faildozer

IMSlacker
06-18-2008, 03:15 PM
Worse than pmaphone?

That will be my most epic fail ever. And that's in a long list.


I can't wait to see how this turns out.

Maybe he's referring to another thread. There's no way of knowing for sure.

RhinoinMN
06-18-2008, 03:23 PM
Maybe he's referring to another thread. There's no way of knowing for sure.

Easy silly! Just search tags for "worst thread ever"! Try it. It works.

Judge Smails
06-18-2008, 03:24 PM
Monkeyhoooooouse!

Repent 13

Just the word the Who

TheMojoPin
06-18-2008, 03:29 PM
Heres a question
What exactly is the point of tags?
They were added as a new featurein 2.0 and we abused those priveledge and were taken away except for the mods or thread starter. Fine I understand that BUT if we have tags and there is no list to chose from then all you have is a bunch of random tags that don't go anywhere.

For Example
If you click on a tag it will bring you all the threads that have that tag, but since all tags are just random saying if you click on the tag all you will get is the one thread that has that tag the one your looking at already. I think they were a funny thing that we abused but that is better then tags that don't do a damn thing.
Try clicking on a tag at the bottom of a thread and see if Im right
I say dump em

Tags are epic fail except on porn torrent sites and anal retentive blogs.

Marc with a c
06-18-2008, 07:45 PM
pmaphone will be big in '09

King Hippos Bandaid
06-23-2008, 08:41 PM
strikes out in softball and threads

Friday
06-23-2008, 08:43 PM
dumbest idea ever

BoondockSaint
06-23-2008, 10:34 PM
pmaphone will be big in '09


Just leave GVAC out of it.