Maybe Earl was right about the dinosaurs

[OGC]

Earl has a new source (http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080921/COMMENTARY/809219997) to quote in his argument that man and dinosaurs walked the earth together.

[Foster]

Earl said there were dinosaurs on the Arc with Noah, this article says it was the flood that killed the dinosaurs off. Who is right Earl or the Bishop from the 1600s...

[underdog]

Roger Ebert is a creationist?

[patsopinion]

fucking knew i hated that guy

[Judge Smails]

Roger Ebert is a creationist?

Roger Ebert has been battling thyroid cancer since 2002 and salivary gland cancer since 2003. In 2006 he had part of his cancerous jawbone removed leaving him unable to speak. In July of this year his carotid artery burst.

I guarantee you that when I'm that close to death, I'll be a Creationist too. It's just called covering all your bases.

[DarkHippie]

i give it a thumbs down

[brettmojo]

Such freaking nonsense. Where were the Leprechauns and Mogwai on the ark? Man is doomed.

[IamFogHat]

Sigh, it's a joke you hayseeds.
BTW I have a gread anecdote about creationist Catholic priests, but I have to figure out how to translate the hilarity to the written form. Stay tuned.

[Sue_Bender]

Sigh, it's a joke you hayseeds.



How so? (My best Asian impression)

I don't know where the lines are exactly, so reading between them is always a problem.

[IamFogHat]

How so? (My best Asian impression)

I don't know where the rines are exactly, so reading between them is araywys a probrem.

Fixed it for ya.

[Sue_Bender]

Fixed it for ya.


:lol:

[Snoogans]

What about bones representing such species as Cro-Magnon Man and Neanderthal Man?

A. Created at the same time as man. They did not survive. In fact, all surviving species and many others were created fully formed at the same time. At that moment they were of various ages and in varying degrees of health. Some individuals died an instant later, others within seconds, minutes or hours.

Some nice god, creating a bunch of people and starting them on their death bed.

[Snoogans]

Q. What did the creatures on the Ark eat?

A. Food on board, fish, and possibly trapped sea birds.

after reading this one, im convinced he has to be doing some kind of satire. He cant be serious

[PapaBear]

Why can't Earl just admit that the dinosaurs were Greek?

[DolaMight]

Do you think a caveman ever did a dinosaur? Dinostiality?

[Sue_Bender]

Do you think a caveman ever did a dinosaur? Dinostiality?



O-Biff-is-all-e.

[CousinDave]

http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~ricardo/misc/fsm3ga.jpg

[Sue_Bender]

http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/%7Ericardo/misc/fsm3ga.jpg


Forgive you, for you know not what you've done.


Yikes!!

[CrashDown]

Creationisim: Sonofabitch, that lopsided faced fuck beleives in this shit? And roger ebert too?

I love how people have hardly noticed this line for the bible, and not the king james version, but the old school first translation of the old testament.

QUOTE: And god said, let US make him in OUR image, with OUR likeness

hmmm..... Now go look up the Summerian's and the Annuaki in google.

take a look at all the information hey had 6,000 years ago. Information about how humans came to be. What our solar system looked like. The 10th planet named NIBIRU, which will be crossing through the inner solar system in 2012-2013 and will be visible to all around early to mid 2009 in the southern sky.

Fucking creationisim assholes.

i bet if Black Earl blew a load on a normal basis he might actually come to realize how absolutely stupid creationisim is.

-CrashDown

[Name]

There are several documentary reviews and other articles which give his opinion as exactly the opposite of this recent one

2005 review: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050328/COMMENTARY/503280301

[KnoxHarrington]

Ebert printed a follow up to that column where, basically, he scolded people for not getting that it's satire.

But, I'm sorry, when you issue a list of reasons that sounds exactly what people are seriously putting forward as "proof" of their argument, that doesn't strike me as very good "satire". Because, yes, Ebert might have meant this as a list showing the idiocy of these positions, but you know it's being distributed by the "teach the controversy" crowd as arguments to use.

[epo]

This photo in the article:

http://ebimg.sv.publicus.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Site=EB&Date=20080921&Category=COMMENTARY&ArtNo=809219997&Ref=AR&Maxw=438

That should have told you that Ebert was do a bit of satire. Anybody who reads any of Ebert's non-film review work would understand that not only is he a progressive-leaning mind, but that he also has a weird sense of humor.

The man did write a Russ Meyers flick afterall.