ecobag2
01-30-2009, 08:41 PM
Ok so here's a fun one.
I'm 35. I've led an interesting life that has landed me back in college classes - though I wish I could go full time, for the time being - I have to take one class per semester and figure out a plan for getting a career change figured out and a course of action set up. I'm starting to think online or mostly online classes might be the way to go.
That said... I started taking a math course this semester and it didn't work out. I emailed with a dean back and forth and he eventually said something like "look - you have to attend class."
My work schedule had me missing a lot of class (at least 1/3 of classes) and I decided that it wasn't going to work out and that I should drop. I have another W on my transcript. Great.
So I realize .. shit, I don't have any classes I'm taking so now I have to pick something up that's going to a. kind of work w/ my employment schedule and b. I don't have to show up. Enter INTRO TO PHILOSOPHY - far cry from math class.
Here's my problem: math is numbers - you get the right ones and you go "2xy-7" and the prof goes - right ... that's it. I just sat in a small classroom discussion today discussing why the "god by design" is refutable and what we thought of blah blah blah ... the prof is fucking 25 or so... the class on average is a freshman class.. 17 and 18 year olds. This is not give a number - this is where you bring up analogies from your life experience to support arguments and it becomes painfully apparent that one of these things is not like the other.
Case in point:
Prof: someone give an example of an analogy - like let's say two movies
Me: well how about Top Gun and Iron Eagles... You'd say Iron Eagles is Top Gun but it sucks. Or there's less famous actors or whatever...
Dead Silence.
And the only reason why I made the reference is because the prof referred to Ghostbusters at one point. Dickhead - nice man purse.
So I think everyone, including myself is uncomfortable. Now I'm starting to think it's hilarious. But I know there's a strong feeling of "adult learners like to dominate discussions because younger students conisdered naive etc . etc...." and I'm trying to avoid that whole situation. I 'd like it ot be just about the material... which I don't know anything about.
I'm pretty excited b/c I got through a few college philosophy classes w/o learning anything when I was their age. I'd like to know what's a given at this point. I've heard the design thing about God for years now but never gave thought to what's considered a good refutation, if refutable at all, till today.
I took quite awhile to type this and if for no other reason than that I'm hitting post.
There's a couple minutes you'll never get back.:dry:
I'm 35. I've led an interesting life that has landed me back in college classes - though I wish I could go full time, for the time being - I have to take one class per semester and figure out a plan for getting a career change figured out and a course of action set up. I'm starting to think online or mostly online classes might be the way to go.
That said... I started taking a math course this semester and it didn't work out. I emailed with a dean back and forth and he eventually said something like "look - you have to attend class."
My work schedule had me missing a lot of class (at least 1/3 of classes) and I decided that it wasn't going to work out and that I should drop. I have another W on my transcript. Great.
So I realize .. shit, I don't have any classes I'm taking so now I have to pick something up that's going to a. kind of work w/ my employment schedule and b. I don't have to show up. Enter INTRO TO PHILOSOPHY - far cry from math class.
Here's my problem: math is numbers - you get the right ones and you go "2xy-7" and the prof goes - right ... that's it. I just sat in a small classroom discussion today discussing why the "god by design" is refutable and what we thought of blah blah blah ... the prof is fucking 25 or so... the class on average is a freshman class.. 17 and 18 year olds. This is not give a number - this is where you bring up analogies from your life experience to support arguments and it becomes painfully apparent that one of these things is not like the other.
Case in point:
Prof: someone give an example of an analogy - like let's say two movies
Me: well how about Top Gun and Iron Eagles... You'd say Iron Eagles is Top Gun but it sucks. Or there's less famous actors or whatever...
Dead Silence.
And the only reason why I made the reference is because the prof referred to Ghostbusters at one point. Dickhead - nice man purse.
So I think everyone, including myself is uncomfortable. Now I'm starting to think it's hilarious. But I know there's a strong feeling of "adult learners like to dominate discussions because younger students conisdered naive etc . etc...." and I'm trying to avoid that whole situation. I 'd like it ot be just about the material... which I don't know anything about.
I'm pretty excited b/c I got through a few college philosophy classes w/o learning anything when I was their age. I'd like to know what's a given at this point. I've heard the design thing about God for years now but never gave thought to what's considered a good refutation, if refutable at all, till today.
I took quite awhile to type this and if for no other reason than that I'm hitting post.
There's a couple minutes you'll never get back.:dry: