2010 Ron & Fez Oscar Show

[Bowel]

When's the show airing .... 6 pm ET or 8 pm ET?

http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/03/04/yes-another-ron-and-fez-twitter-party-this-time-for-the-oscars/

[STC-Dub]

When Fez mentioned on the show he said it was from 8 PM until midnight in the east.

[East Side Dave]

Ron & Fez will be on LIVE Sunday starting at eight EST...... I am going for the Peter Jackson-signed Lord of The Rings dvd. I will beat all of you and win that prize. FACE.

[Melk]

Ron & Fez will be on LIVE Sunday starting at eight EST...... I am going for the Peter Jackson-signed Lord of The Rings dvd. I will beat all of you and win that prize. FACE.
Hey, Dave. If I beat you, will you Kanye my prize?

[Contra]

Ron & Fez will be on LIVE Sunday starting at eight EST...... I am going for the Peter Jackson-signed Lord of The Rings dvd. I will beat all of you and win that prize. FACE.

Once I get my new phone I think I'm going to try out the twitter, maybe.

[STC-Dub]

Ron & Fez will be on LIVE Sunday starting at eight EST...... I am going for the Peter Jackson-signed Lord of The Rings dvd. I will beat all of you and win that prize. FACE.

Shouldn't you be working then?

[Donnie Iris]

Do you have to belong to Twitter or whatever to participate?

[STC-Dub]

You have to answer on Twitter so yes.

[Godzoox]

ABC pulls WABC-TV off Cablevision in New York area
by Lynette Rice
Categories: News, Oscars, TV Biz, Television

ABC-Disney followed through with its threat tonight by pulling the New York-area WABC-TV from Cablevision after it failed to reach a re-transmission agreement with the cable giant. Some 3 million Cablevision customers in Long Island, Westchester, Brooklyn, and parts of Connecticut and New Jersey were affected.

Rebecca Campbell, President and General Manager, WABC-TV, released this statement: “Cablevision has once again betrayed its subscribers by losing ABC7, the most popular station in the tri-state area. This follows two years of negotiations, during which we worked diligently, up to the final moments, to reach an agreement. Cablevision pocketed almost $8 billion last year, and now customers aren’t getting what they pay for…again. It’s time for Jim Dolan and the Dolan Family Dynasty to finally step up, be fair, and do what’s right for our viewers.”

Cablevision’s exec VP of communications Charles Schueler released a statement in response: “It is now painfully clear to millions of New York area households that Disney CEO Bob Iger will hold his own ABC viewers hostage in order to extract $40 million in new fees from Cablevision. We call on Bob Iger to immediately return ABC to Cablevision customers while we continue to work to reach a fair agreement.”

ABC began warning customers last week that they could miss the Oscars because of the stalemate. Affected subscribers can still access WABC-TV for free by going old-school with an antenna.

[PapaBear]

Affected subscribers can still access WABC-TV for free by going old-school with an antenna.
And a digital converter box for around $50.

[Gerald]

Looking forward to hearing this. Fez was in peak catty form during last year's Oscar Preshow Spectacular when he critiqued the fashion styles of the rich and famous. He dominated the broadcast so much that a neutral listener might've gotten the impression that Ron was second mic despite getting top billing in the show title.

[hanso]

Hasn't Fez covered the I-did-a-rod? Maybe he can go on Esd's new sports show.

[thepaulo]

Looking forward to hearing this. Fez was in peak catty form during last year's Oscar Preshow Spectacular when he critiqued the fashion styles of the rich and famous. He dominated the broadcast so much that a neutral listener might've gotten the impression that Ron was second mic despite getting top billing in the show title.

can he do it again?

[Skunkboy]

Will this require the same DVR procedures as last year, or will it not be a "watch-it-with-us" commentary? Last year was great.

[disneyspy]

Will this require the same DVR procedures as last year, or will it not be a "watch-it-with-us" commentary? Last year was great.

i believe i heard them say they'll give us a countdown

[Serpico1103]

Can anyone tell me why I should care about the Oscars? How much weight do we put into their decisions? How many times do they give awards for past efforts (robbing someone this year)?
It isn't like years ago when we rarely glimpsed the stars. I get see them all running to starbucks and yoga every day now.
The show itself is usually nothing spectacular.

[hanso]

Can anyone tell me why I should care about the Oscars? How much weight do we put into their decisions? How many times do they give awards for past efforts (robbing someone this year)?
It isn't like years ago when we rarely glimpsed the stars. I get see them all running to starbucks and yoga every day now.
The show itself is usually nothing spectacular.

You shouldn't. And that's what makes the R&F special shows so great.

[thepaulo]

Can anyone tell me why I should care about the Oscars? How much weight do we put into their decisions? How many times do they give awards for past efforts (robbing someone this year)?
It isn't like years ago when we rarely glimpsed the stars. I get see them all running to starbucks and yoga every day now.
The show itself is usually nothing spectacular.

Because there are too many dickweed bloggers who don't know fucking shit from shinola.

[Bowel]

Because there are too many dickweed bloggers who don't know fucking shit from shinola.



Are you getting liquored up for the Oscars bro?

[thepaulo]

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2010/03/disneys-wabc-still-off-in-cablevision-homes-as-feud-continues.html

the Cablevision/ABC dsipute going to the wire.

[Serpico1103]

Because there are too many dickweed bloggers who don't know fucking shit from shinola.

Meaning?
Why should I care what the academy thinks? At least with critics I know who they are and how they have reviewed movies in the past.

[StanUpshaw]

I don't get much out of the broadcast, but I appreciate having the Academy Awards as a historical reference. When I look for old movies to watch, I check Oscar and Cannes nominations.

[thepaulo]

Meaning?
Why should I care what the academy thinks? At least with critics I know who they are and how they have reviewed movies in the past.


There are plenty of critics awards and they have some value...The Oscars have value too because it is an industry insider award and their perspective is different.

Everyone has an opinion like everyone has an asshole....sometimes I prefer a different type of asshole.

[disneyspy]

http://sebersole.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/oscar.jpg

awwwww buddays..


Bergen Bar Night coming up soon. (http://www.ronfez.net/forums/showthread.php?t=86859)

Hear something you want to talk about on the show. Start a thread and let us all discuss it. (
http://www.ronfez.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)



RonFez.net's Greatest Thread- Damn the kids are cute (
http://www.ronfez.net/forums/showthread.php?t=67067&highlight=Kids)

Call the show at: 866 RON 0 FEZ

Feel Better Stanley Mac.

[Gerald]

Can anyone tell me why I should care about the Oscars?

You shouldn't. They're the be all end all for cinematic worth only for those with superficial knowledge of the medium. I only watch because old habits die hard, and I hope to witness one of those shocking upsets that are seemingly more rare in an era when conclusions are as foregone as ever. The ceremony loses credibility every year, and most of the time the statuettes are doled out based on industry politics. The foremost examples this year of actual cinematic quality not factoring into the voting process are the likely occurrences of Bigalow taking home Best Director solely because a person with a vagina has never prevailed in this particular cateogry, and Bullock taking home Best Actress for an unworthy-of-Academy-recognition project simply because she's well-liked among her peers. Much like box office, movie geeks make up the rules for the relevancy of Academy Awards as they go along. If we like a movie that does well financially or triumphs at the Oscars, then there's a clear correlation between cinematic quality with these ancillary outlets. If we dislike a movie that does well financially or triumphs at the Oscars, then we're apt to disregard both as true barometers of cinematic quality.

[Gerald]

Internet people who bash Maggie Gyllenhaal for being ugly should die in a fire.

I just saw her on the red carpet. Radiant.

[StanUpshaw]

I've jacked to those pictures of her breastfeeding so many times.

[Dan G]

If you listen online the delay is longer than regular radios. 45 second delay for online listeners. My remote has a 15 second back button, so I clicked it 3 times and I'm synced up perfectly.

[Serpico1103]

I don't get much out of the broadcast, but I appreciate having the Academy Awards as a historical reference. When I look for old movies to watch, I check Oscar and Cannes nominations.

A nomination meant as much as winning. Except now that they increased the number, being nominated is meaningless.

You shouldn't. They're the be all end all for cinematic worth only for those with superficial knowledge of the medium. I only watch because old habits die hard, and I hope to witness one of those shocking upsets that are seemingly more rare in an era when conclusions are as foregone as ever. The ceremony loses credibility every year, and most of the time the statuettes are doled out based on industry politics. The foremost examples this year of actual cinematic quality not factoring into the voting process are the likely occurrences of Bigalow taking home Best Director solely because a person with a vagina has never prevailed in this particular cateogry, and Bullock taking home Best Actress for an unworthy-of-Academy-recognition project simply because she's well-liked among her peers. Much like box office, movie geeks make up the rules for the relevancy of Academy Awards as they go along. If we like a movie that does well financially or triumphs at the Oscars, then there's a clear correlation between cinematic quality with these ancillary outlets. If we dislike a movie that does well financially or triumphs at the Oscars, then we're apt to disregard both as true barometers of cinematic quality.

Thank you. Not a big fan of an awards show. I couldn't see sitting through a two hour show for them to present world series, super bowl, and stanley cups.

[Dell]

hello buddays...is there an online video feed for the oscars?..

stuck at the computer in a room with no tv...

[disneyspy]

hello buddays...is there an online video feed for the oscars?..

stuck at the computer in a room with no tv...

PM SENT

[Jughead]

Hello thanks spy!!!

[The Nature Boy]

Fez is actually quicker than Dave tonight, this sort of gig is right in his wheelhouse. And Ronnie is hit or miss with the machine gun jokes, Fezzie is the sniper who's coming in and killing with his occasional jokes.

Fez is back!

[Jughead]

Fez is actually quicker than Dave tonight, this sort of gig is right in his wheelhouse. And Ronnie is hit or miss with the machine gun jokes, Fezzie is the sniper who's coming in and killing with his occasional jokes.

Fez is back!

That is why you never light three on a match.... Fezzy will sight you in....agree

[Contra]

A nomination meant as much as winning. Except now that they increased the number, being nominated is meaningless.



Thank you. Not a big fan of an awards show. I couldn't see sitting through a two hour show for them to present world series, super bowl, and stanley cups.

You won't wait two hours but you'll wait two weeks for the world series or 3 to 4 hours for a superbowl?

I don't see where you are going with this.

[Serpico1103]

You won't wait two hours but you'll wait two weeks for the world series or 3 to 4 hours for a superbowl?

I don't see where you are going with this.
Yes I'll wait to see the game. Just like I wait to see the movies. But if instead of just giving the trophy at the end of superbowl they had a two hour show with bad bits and a celebrity fashion show I wouldn't watch. It's all pomp and circumstance.

[disneyspy]

Yes I'll wait to see the game. Just like I wait to see the movies. But if instead of just giving the trophy at the end of superbowl they had a two hour show with bad bits and a celebrity fashion show I wouldn't watch. It's all pomp and circumstance.

WRONG! it was a 4 hour show with a 2 hour preshow and ron and fez were great to watch the show with

[Donnie Iris]

Yes I'll wait to see the game. Just like I wait to see the movies. But if instead of just giving the trophy at the end of superbowl they had a two hour show with bad bits and a celebrity fashion show I wouldn't watch. It's all pomp and circumstance.


Man, you love to complain. Like you, the fascination wwith these award shows (namely now) escapses me. However, why come here to bitch about it? My suggestion: Don't watch.

[Serpico1103]

Man, you love to complain. Like you, the fascination wwith these award shows (namely now) escapses me. However, why come here to bitch about it? My suggestion: Don't watch.
I was asking what the attraction is. Thought maybe people could offer insight, like gerald. I love movies(netflixing at least 6 a week) . But I have watched oscars before and was bored senseless. However, I could see it being fun to watch with r+f. Lastly, you are becoming obsessed with me. Got it, I lost my chance at universal acceptance.

[spainlinx0]

Is this show going to make it into the library soon? Couldn't catch it, but would love to listen, and I know these special shows often make it in there.