Ground Zero Mosque ~ The RF.net Poll

[torker]

Yes
No
Unsure


save your arguing for elsewhere
I want numbers

[spoon]

Can you add a "don't care option"?

I really don't think it's a yes no type question unless you're asking if it should be allowed or not.

[torker]

cold hard numbers

i agree its really a none issue

YES
NO
UNSURE

[spoon]

I voted yes as in it should be allowed...OF COURSE.

I could care less and doesn't impact me or YOU in any way, shape or form.

[Dude!]

I voted yes as in it should be allowed...OF COURSE.


what a dumb comment...
of course it should be 'allowed'
ie, it is legal
that was never a question
with the majority of Americans

[spoon]

what a dumb comment...
of course it should be 'allowed'
ie, it is legal
that was never a question
with the majority of Americans

The point is, I don't care enough to say YES they should or NO they shouldn't. It simply isn't/shouldn't be an issue. So sorry you feel this is dumb as you continue to write like a child.

[Kevin]

what a dumb comment...
of course it should be 'allowed'
ie, it is legal
that was never a question
with the majority of Americans



What Majority do you speak of?

[Dude!]

What Majority do you speak of?

the 64% in the gallup poll

[Syd]

what a dumb comment...
of course it should be 'allowed'
ie, it is legal
that was never a question
with the majority of Americans

No, the vast majority of Americans don't want it their because they have a callous disregard for their rights unless they think it specifically involves them.

[Chigworthy]

Can I get a merge credit?

[torker]

the 64% in the gallup poll

fuck that noise

look at the ronfez #s

[Dude!]

No, the vast majority of Americans don't want it their because they have a callous disregard for their rights unless they think it specifically involves them.

no, 64% say it should be allowed
ie, they have a legal right
to build there

but 68% think they should CHOOSE
not to build there....

like Governor Paterson
and Harry Reid

[Syd]

Haven't seen that poll but that is encouraging.

[spoon]

petey barnum, really?

[K.C.]

Can I vote if you don't live in NYC, you should shut the fuck up right now?

Local issue.

[Kevin]

What a group group no is..

[Kevin]

petey barnum, really?



petey barnum!

[scottinnj]

I voted no, but I wish the "unsure" option would rather have been "somewhere else"

I just don't like the idea of it being that close to Ground Zero, but like I said elsewhere, it's a moot point because nobody can decide what to build on Ground Zero anyway, so in a sense, it's our fault that this is where we are at.

[Dirtbag]

No, the vast majority of Americans don't want it their because they have a callous disregard for their rights unless they think it specifically involves them.

Do you not do any research or do you just have that much contempt for people who aren't on your side?

[WRESTLINGFAN]

no, 64% say it should be allowed
ie, they have a legal right
to build there

but 68% think they should CHOOSE
not to build there....

like Governor Paterson
and Harry Reid

Holy Shit even this guy

http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2010/08/al-arabiya-director-most-muslims-dont.html

[scottinnj]

I don't know if they know about this website or our poll, but since Hamas wants the mosque built (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/hamas_nod_for_gz_mosque_cSohH9eha8sNZMTDz0VVPI), I figured I'd make their vote known because don't we want every voice heard?

[torker]

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bWmA1bzG7lM/0.jpg
there are lies
there are damned lies
& there are statistics

[epo]

I agree that this is a local issue, but I'm also convinced that this issue is a symbol of who we are as a people.

If we are truly the nation of laws and freedoms that we claim to be, then we must respect the rights of any legal entity to reside in that building. If the terrorists truly "hate us for our freedoms", then let's be the most modern-thinking, free sombitches on the planet.

Do it.

[Syd]

Do you not do any research or do you just have that much contempt for people who aren't on your side?

I have a lot of contempt for people who like pissing on some of the most basic parts of the Constitution, yes.

[WRESTLINGFAN]

When will Pelosi begin those probes on people opposed to the Mosque? She's going to need a huge bureaucracy for that.

Seriously, I hate that fucking cunt. Even though I believe Park51/Cordoba should be built, and its freedom of religion. There are still people who oppose it, they have a 1st Ammendment right to petition. I can not believe someone that high in Gov't would say something like that. I dont believe that most of them are hateful people just as I wouldnt want them to believe the majority on this thread suppord Jihad.

[epo]

When will Pelosi begin those probes on people opposed to the Mosque? She's going to need a huge bureaucracy for that.

Seriously, I hate that fucking cunt. Even though I believe Park51/Cordoba should be built, and its freedom of religion. There are still people who oppose it, they have a 1st Ammendment right to petition. I can not believe someone that high in Gov't would say something like that. I dont believe that most of them are hateful people just as I wouldnt want them to believe the majority on this thread suppord Jihad.

This thread isn't about your silly contempt for lady parts, its about your contempt for brown people.

Get your threads straight...

[WRESTLINGFAN]

This thread isn't about your silly contempt for lady parts, its about your contempt for brown people.

Get your threads straight...

I have contempt for this brown person


http://a.espncdn.com/media/mlb/2004/0903/photo/a_brown_hi.jpg

[Kevin]

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bWmA1bzG7lM/0.jpg
there are lies
there are damned lies
& there are statistics



And their are lies that fox news pute up as statistics.

[WRESTLINGFAN]

This thread isn't about your silly contempt for lady parts, its about your contempt for brown people.

Get your threads straight...

Honestly do you think what she said wasn't bothersome ?

[epo]

Honestly do you think what she said wasn't bothersome ?

You do understand that her job is to flank far to the left for the public for political purposes, right?

Just like Tom Delay, Newt Gingrich, John Boehner, Mitch McConnell flank to the right.

Its their job to not be liked by the other side.

[Recyclerz]

save your arguing for elsewhere
I want numbers

http://writingcompany.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/argument_clinic.jpg

I thought this was the room for arguments.

[PapaBear]

I voted yes as in it should be allowed...OF COURSE.
Same here.

[TripleSkeet]

It doesnt affect me either way. But I voted Yes simply for the fact that legally they have every right to build it, and Im not a big fan of taking away someones rights because alot of people dont like it. Thats not what America is supposed to stand for. If that were the case porn wouldve been gone in the 70s.

[SatCam]

once again rf.net proves its a left-wing cesspool of groupthinkers. go back to watching msnbc you imbeciles.

[Dude!]

once again rf.net proves its a left-wing cesspool of groupthinkers.

it's not so much that...
it's more like 2 or 3 people
voting under 7 - 10
of their screen names

[Barnaby Jones]

once again rf.net proves its a left-wing cesspool of groupthinkers. go back to watching msnbc you imbeciles.

If the majority voted "no" wouldn't that just make us a right-wing cesspool of groupthinkers?

[PapaBear]

it's not so much that...
it's more like 2 or 3 people
voting under 7 - 10
of their screen names
Yeah. I hate it when spoon posts under his johnniehardrock screen name.

[TripleSkeet]

Whats my other screen name?

[PapaBear]

Whats my other screen name?
TooCute

[Dude!]

Whats my other screen name?

angrymissy

[TripleSkeet]

angrymissy

Ooohhh I dont think shes gonna like that. :lol:

TooCute

Damn. Snagged.

[PapaBear]

angrymissy
Your "joke" doesn't work. She hasn't voted.

[TripleSkeet]

angrymissy

Your "joke" doesn't work. She hasn't voted.

Fail.

http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/4327/fail2.gif (http://img8.imageshack.us/i/fail2.gif/)

[spoon]

Whats my other screen name?

TooCute

Wait, I would fuck TripleSkeet? :wink:

[PapaBear]

Wait, I would fuck TripleSkeet? :wink:
You haven't?

[spoon]

once again rf.net proves its a left-wing cesspool of groupthinkers. go back to watching msnbc you imbeciles.

If the majority voted "no" wouldn't that just make us a right-wing cesspool of groupthinkers?

I'm quite sure he wasn't serious.

[spoon]

once again rf.net proves its a left-wing cesspool of groupthinkers. go back to watching msnbc you imbeciles.

it's not so much that...
it's more like 2 or 3 people
voting under 7 - 10
of their screen names

The only name I'm not 100% sure of being legit voted no (Petey Barnum). The rest at this point check out. Unless it's possible WF and Dude! are the same person. I really can't tell you apart on the board and never met either. Hmmmmm.....

[spoon]

Perhaps the two pitt names I guess. Not sure and missed them the first time. However, the names pretty much check out overall.

[PapaBear]

The only name I'm not 100% sure of being legit voted no (Petey Barnum). The rest at this point check out. Unless it's possible WF and Dude! are the same person. I really can't tell you apart on the board and never met either. Hmmmmm.....
WF?

[PapaBear]

Perhaps the two pitt names I guess. Not sure and missed them the first time. However, the names pretty much check out overall.
Nah... pitdoc is actually some kind of doctor or something. I can't remember to what level, but his name has nothing to do with Pittsburgh. But, yeah... Pretty much all legit screen names.

[spoon]

WF?

Ooops, just noticed WF never actually voted. Well expect a WrestlingFan vote for No real soon, unless he actually votes the way he made it sound like he would. I think he's trying to dodge this vote.

[PapaBear]

Ooops, just noticed WF never actually voted. Well expect a WrestlingFan vote for No real soon.
Isn't it cute how the people who accuse the Prez of usurping the Constitution, are so against certain other Constitutional rights with this issue?

Disclaimer... I have no idea if WF has ever said that. I'm just talking about people of his ilk.

Oops... I should have posted this in the discussion thread about this issue. Oh, well. I'm sure someone else already has.

[spoon]

Isn't it cute how the people who accuse the Prez of usurping the Constitution, are so against certain other Constitutional rights with this issue?

Disclaimer... I have no idea if WF has ever said that. I'm just talking about people of his ilk.

Oops... I should have posted this in the discussion thread about this issue. Oh, well. I'm sure someone else already has.

He's claiming to be on the "it should be allowed line of thinking, just it shouldn't happen". Cute platform.

[spoon]

so he claims

[PapaBear]

Cute platform.
Yeah... I'd like to see TooCute's platform, too.

Wow... That was bad.

[spoon]

Yeah... I'd like to see TooCute's platform, too.

Wow... That was bad.

Not as bad as "creepsanity!" :lol:

[sailor]

He's claiming to be on the "it should be allowed line of thinking, just it shouldn't happen". Cute platform.

the same platform as the president pretty much, no?

[WRESTLINGFAN]

Ooops, just noticed WF never actually voted. Well expect a WrestlingFan vote for No real soon, unless he actually votes the way he made it sound like he would. I think he's trying to dodge this vote.

Check my vote!!!!

[Dude!]

Isn't it cute how the people who accuse the Prez of usurping the Constitution, are so against certain other Constitutional rights with this issue?

if you are going to bring
the constitution into this
then you should know
what it says:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

in this entire discussion,
who has ever suggested
that congress should make
a law re 'establishment of religion'
or make a law 'prohibiting the free
exercise thereof'?

[WRESTLINGFAN]

Looks like Former DNC Boss Howard Dean is un American and Queen Nancy needs to investigate him

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/former_vermont_ground_howard_dean_TVP6FsmlsCkAwfWk cZgGkP

[Crispy123]

Looks like Former DNC Boss Howard Dean is un American and Queen Nancy needs to investigate him

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/former_vermont_ground_howard_dean_TVP6FsmlsCkAwfWk cZgGkP

Come on WF, prove Barnaby wrong about your reading comprehension skills.

"The freedom of religion is a Constitutional right. Where a place of worship is located is a local decision.

"I support the statement made by the Interfaith Alliance that 'We agree with the ADL that there is a need for transparency about who is funding the effort to build this Islamic center. At the same time, we should also ask who is funding the attacks against the construction of the center.'

"For all of those expressing concern about the 9/11 families, we call upon them to join us in support of the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act when Congress returns in September."


http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/08/pelosi_clarifies_call_for_prob.html

I highly doubt Dean is putting any funding into this issue.

[SinA]

there is no "should"
it IS allowed, because we have a goddamn constitution.

any other speculation or debate is for tards.

[Dude!]

any other speculation or debate is for tards.

that's why you see
so many posts from
kevin

[Kevin]

WF?

WrestlingFan...

[Kevin]

that's why you see
so many posts from
kevin

Coming

from

a

Cletus

who

writes

like

a

five

year

old

retarded

child..

[TripleSkeet]

Come on WF, prove Barnaby wrong about your reading comprehension skills.



http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/08/pelosi_clarifies_call_for_prob.html

I highly doubt Dean is putting any funding into this issue.

She makes a great point actually. All the republicans fighting to not allow this mosque because it "disrespects" those that died or saved lives on 9/11 but for some reason none of them seem to have a problem with their party voting down a bill to give guaranteed healthcare to 9/11 responders. Oh the hypocrisy.

[WRESTLINGFAN]

Come on WF, prove Barnaby wrong about your reading comprehension skills.



http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/08/pelosi_clarifies_call_for_prob.html

I highly doubt Dean is putting any funding into this issue.

And the freedom to petition is also a right. Pelosi can't have it both ways. Americans dont have a right to voice their opposition to thisd without being probed?

Sure lets investigate a widow of a firefighter who opposes this

[Crispy123]

And the freedom to petition is also a right. Pelosi can't have it both ways. Americans dont have a right to voice their opposition to thisd without being probed?

:wallbash::wallbash::wallbash:

its that the funding on both sides of the issue should be considered is what she said.

[Sofa_King]

what a dumb comment...
of course it should be 'allowed'
ie, it is legal
that was never a question
with the majority of Americans

is this some kind of haiku?

[brettmojo]

This PC shit has gotten way outta' control.

[Crispy123]

This PC shit has gotten way outta' control.

http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/hello-im-a-mac-and-im-a-pc.jpg

[WRESTLINGFAN]

:wallbash::wallbash::wallbash:

its that the funding on both sides of the issue should be considered is what she said.

If a firemans widow donated to an ad campaign or PAC because she opposed the mosque then she might get investigated because wouldn't that group would have to disclose their sources of funds ?

[Serpico1103]

If a firemans widow donated to an ad campaign or PAC because she opposed the mosque then she might get investigated because wouldn't that group would have to disclose their sources of funds ?

If they investigate the mosque's funding (something that is not usually done), then yes, why wouldn't you also investigate the opposition.
What does the widow have to worry about? Is she afraid of her government? Maybe she shouldn't have gotten involved than.

[StanUpshaw]

WF is completely correct on this point. The idea that the government is going to investigate controversial speech is abominable.

[Serpico1103]

WF is completely correct on this point. The idea that the government is going to investigate controversial speech is abominable.

That isn't his point.

[StanUpshaw]

That isn't his point.

"Americans dont have a right to voice their opposition to thisd without being probed?

Sure lets investigate a widow of a firefighter who opposes this"

-WF Axl Rose

[Crispy123]

WF is completely correct on this point. The idea that the government is going to investigate controversial speech is abominable.

nobody else but WF said that so no he is not correct.

[WRESTLINGFAN]

If they investigate the mosque's funding (something that is not usually done), then yes, why wouldn't you also investigate the opposition.
What does the widow have to worry about? Is she afraid of her government? Maybe she shouldn't have gotten involved than.

She has the right to voice her opposition without having a fear of being investigated.

Freedom of Speech is just as relevant of freedom of religion

[Crispy123]

If a firemans widow donated to an ad campaign or PAC because she opposed the mosque then she might get investigated because wouldn't that group would have to disclose their sources of funds ?

PAC's and US corporations have finance regulations that they have to follow, including non-profits. No one mentioned investigating individuals for donating to anything

[Serpico1103]

She has the right to voice her opposition without having a fear of being investigated.

Freedom of Speech is just as relevant of freedom of religion

Settle down. Charity funding requires a certain level of transparency. If a fireman's widow (again you get so emotional) donates $1K, no one is kicking down her door. If she donates $1M, a red flag may go up and the IRS or another governmental agency may want to follow the money.

Pelosi's position, if I may, is that opposition to the Mosque is being used as a political tool by the right. It is not some grassroots movement as the right would like to portray. Much like Glenn Beck's analysis of how ACORN and other groups are funded, she would like to see how these groups are funded.
No one is investigating individual citizens. Keep up with visceral reactions, they are always useful in making important decisions.

[SinA]

She has the right to voice her opposition without having a fear of being investigated.

Freedom of Speech is just as relevant of freedom of religion

They don't have to investigate anyone, just tune in to the warrantless wiretap that Georgie Boy set up.

[WRESTLINGFAN]

They don't have to investigate anyone, just tune in to the warrantless wiretap that Georgie Boy set up.

And Barry boy is continuing

[booster11373]

And Barry boy is continuing

You fail at reciprocal humor

[WRESTLINGFAN]

You fail at reciprocal humor

So as long as your boy is continuing Dubya's policies its ok?

YOU FAIL AT CONSISTENCY

[booster11373]

So as long as your boy is continuing Dubya's policies its ok?

YOU FAIL AT CONSISTENCY

Failure of inquisition


I think that perhaps you might be some kind of automated response because you seem incapable of taking any position that includes nuance and does not exist on the fringe. Are you color blind does the world only seem black and white to you?

[WRESTLINGFAN]

Settle down. Charity funding requires a certain level of transparency. If a fireman's widow (again you get so emotional) donates $1K, no one is kicking down her door. If she donates $1M, a red flag may go up and the IRS or another governmental agency may want to follow the money.

Pelosi's position, if I may, is that opposition to the Mosque is being used as a political tool by the right. It is not some grassroots movement as the right would like to portray. Much like Glenn Beck's analysis of how ACORN and other groups are funded, she would like to see how these groups are funded.
No one is investigating individual citizens. Keep up with visceral reactions, they are always useful in making important decisions.

Be realistic

A firemans widow will most likely not donate 1mm.

[Serpico1103]

Be realistic

A firemans widow will most likely not donate 1mm.

So, most likely, she won't be investigated.

You are a politician's dream. Do you really think she wants to investigate individual citizens? Or does she want to see what organizations are behind it?

It is a tangent to corporations having a free speech right. Something every constitutional lover should be against.

[booster11373]

Be realistic



You fail at self knowledge

[disneyspy]

i say no. no religious buildings should be built there,it should be a huge fuckin building dedicated to international buisness

[WRESTLINGFAN]

You fail at self knowledge

You fail at posting anything relevant

[Kevin]

i say no. no religious buildings should be built there,it should be a huge fuckin building dedicated to international buisness



MEXICAN RESTURANTS!

[brettmojo]

MEXICAN RESTURANTS!
Ground Zero Olive Garden sounds good.

[WRESTLINGFAN]

i say no. no religious buildings should be built there,it should be a huge fuckin building dedicated to international buisness

Hamids house of Halal

[spoon]

Hamids house of Halal

Right back to racism. You don't fail at that.

[WRESTLINGFAN]

Right back to racism. You don't fail at that.

What racism?

There was mentioned of a Mexican restaurant and you were ok with that. Get off the soapbox

[Barnaby Jones]

Get some soap!

[WRESTLINGFAN]

Right back to racism. You don't fail at that.

Someone mentioned an Olive Garden. That right there should get them banned !!!

[spoon]

What racism?

There was mentioned of a Mexican restaurant and you were ok with that. Get off the soapbox

Sure thing wf, u arbitrarily just happened to make your pick right?

And as for Kevin, we all know he's hated Mexicans ever since Friday fucked his man crush on the board.

[disneyspy]

And as for Kevin, we all know he's hated Mexicans ever since Friday fucked his man crush on the board.

http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx221/B_Oceander/GIF_Animations/O-bomb.gif

[spoon]

Someone mentioned an Olive Garden. That right there should get them banned !!!

NO WAY. The GZOG is the bestest! Welcome to Italy baby!

http://www.bestweekever.tv/bwe/images/2008/07/sBXQDUgdEbduxg9zAHAwDi3i_400.jpg

[scottinnj]

They don't have to investigate anyone, just tune in to the warrantless wiretap that President Bill Clinton set up.


fixed

[scottinnj]

It is a tangent to corporations having a free speech right. Something every constitutional lover should be against.

I disagree. If it is being taxed, it should have a right to say how much is being taxed and where the taxes should go.

[dino_electropolis]

i say build it, if only to keep all those crazies in one place and make it easier to track them.

[Furtherman]

i say build it, if only to keep all those crazies in one place and make it easier to track them.

Exactly. That's what makes churches so good.

[Serpico1103]

I disagree. If it is being taxed, it should have a right to say how much is being taxed and where the taxes should go.

And serve jail time as well. Oops, they can't.

Corporations are not men, not people. I think they expansion of corporate rights is the single largest problem in the world today.

[Dude!]

And as for Kevin, we all know he's hated Mexicans ever since Friday fucked his man crush on the board.

i wondered why he spewed
such vicious venom toward
Friday

as the object of kevin's latest
man-crush, now i want to
fuck Friday too

[StanUpshaw]

And serve jail time as well. Oops, they can't.

Corporations are not men, not people. I think they expansion of corporate rights is the single largest problem in the world today.

Just remember that what's good for the goose is good for the AFL-CIO.

[TripleSkeet]

Corporations are not men, not people. I think they expansion of corporate rights is the single largest problem in the world today.

This.

[Serpico1103]

Just remember that what's good for the goose is good for the AFL-CIO.

Agreed. However, as corporate power grows, union power must grow in proportion. The need for unions would drop if the power given to corporations was also reigned in.

Corporations in their current form are amoral. People may have natural rights, corporations do not.

[Kevin]

i wondered why he spewed
such vicious venom toward
Friday

as the object of kevin's latest
man-crush, now i want to
fuck Friday too



Thats an easy task even for you...

You seem to bring her up alot..

Go for it.

[Kevin]

I heard spoon wants to be #~"7"~ though, so watch out.

[Kevin]

double post

[Dude!]

I heard spoon wants to be "7" though, so watch out..

i don't know what
that means

[Serpico1103]

i don't know what
that means

I
g
u
e
ss
t
h
a
t
means
f
r
i
da
y
has
had
6
ot
he
rs.

[Dude!]

I
g
u
e
ss
t
h
a
t
means
f
r
i
da
y
has
had
6
ot
he
rs.

damn, i would have thought
it was alot more

6 is nothing

[StanUpshaw]

Agreed. However, as corporate power grows, union power must grow in proportion. The need for unions would drop if the power given to corporations was also reigned in.

Corporations in their current form are amoral. People may have natural rights, corporations do not.

Whatever legitimate function unions may or may not serve is a different question. What I'm talking about is political speech in the form of dollars and cents, and unions wield as much influence as anyone (http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php?type=L). So any obstacles you hope to throw in front of corporate speech will trip up labor as well.

I would argue that throwing up those obstacles is only going to impact the little guy who wants his speech to find an audience, as the Viacoms and NRAs and UAWs have the deep pockets to hire lawyers to fill out the requisite paper work and fight the legal battles...and still have cash left over to buy enough TV time to get their message out PLUS all twenty disclosure statements they'll need.

This should all be a moot point, though, because the Constitution instructs, "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech." Pretty unambiguous, but that doesn't count for much with this government.

[Serpico1103]

This should all be a moot point, though, because the Constitution instructs, "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech." Pretty unambiguous, but that doesn't count for much with this government.


Corporations have no right to exist, let alone freedom of speech.
If the government wanted to, they could end the corporate organization tomorrow. Skipping right over the free speech for corporations issue.

[spoon]

I heard spoon wants to be #~"7"~ though, so watch out.

I will stab you in your mouth! :furious:

take it back! :annoyed:

[StanUpshaw]

Corporations have no right to exist, let alone freedom of speech.
If the government wanted to, they could end the corporate organization tomorrow. Skipping right over the free speech for corporations issue.

Then who would you scapegoat?

[Serpico1103]

I will stab you in your mouth! :furious:

take it back! :annoyed:

There is always room for 8.

[Serpico1103]

Then who would you scapegoat?

The fat kid down the block. I love our healthy give and take.
Whenever forced to have an answer, you resort to insults.

Dude!, WF, SU so predictable.

[StanUpshaw]

The fat kid down the block. I love our healthy give and take.
Whenever forced to have an answer, you restore to insults.

Dude!, WF, SU so predictable.

I'm the one who didn't give an answer!?

[Serpico1103]

I'm the one who didn't give an answer!?

No.

[spoon]

There is always room for 8.

Oh that has probably already happened, she's like the modern day Babe Ruth of, well, you get it.

[Serpico1103]

Oh that has probably already happened, she's like the modern day Babe Ruth of, well, you get it.

Babe Ruth liked facials from message board posters?

[spoon]

Babe Ruth liked facials from message board posters?

chalk boards, get it right

[Kevin]

Good comparison spoon..















both the same build too..




what?

[A.J.]

And as for Kevin, we all know he's hated Mexicans ever since Friday fucked his man crush on the board.

Wow.

[sailor]

Classy.

[disneyspy]

i cant believe dude! is friday

[Misteriosa]

i cant believe dude! is friday

that made me lawl :laugh: