Tenbatsuzen
01-15-2012, 08:17 PM
So here's a situation.
A 3-year old with Wolf-Hirschorn Syndrome will be in need of a kidney transplant in approximately a year.
She is being treated at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, which is one of the top children's hospitals in the country.
Her parents have a bad experience with one of the doctors and a social worker, which is documented here, blogged by the mother:
http://www.wolfhirschhorn.org/2012/01/amelia/brick-walls/
Long story short, the doctor says a mentally retarded child does not qualify for a kidney transplant even if it comes from the family. It mainly stems from quality of care, especially after the parents die (if she survives that long)
Now all shit breaks loose and the hospital is in a PR nightmare.
The hospital's response is as follows:
We hear you.
We feel and understand your frustration, but we are unable to comment publicly on individual cases.
Each child is unique, and our goal is always to provide the best possible medical care for each individual patient.
Please know that CHOP strives to partner with families and make appropriate decisions based on input from many sources, none more important than the patient’s family.
Anything less would be completely inconsistent with the values we work to uphold every day.
We are also taking action to review all existing policies to make sure that they reflect the core values we live by, including our deep commitment to not discriminate in any way.
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia is an institution. But more important, we are a team of men and women whose life’s work and greatest passion are the care of all sick children and the support of their families. To be entrusted with the care of these children is a privilege, one we take with the utmost seriousness.
Personally, this is what I'm seeing:
1) The mother wrote that blog post with every intention to publicly blackmail CHOP into giving the child the transplant. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind, with the way it's written.
2) As a parent, if one hospital is not giving me the quality of service, then I would go to a different hospital.
3) Personally, I think the mother is handling this extremely badly and I think the blog is wildly exaggerated to try and get a response from the soccer mom crowd.
Thoughts?
A 3-year old with Wolf-Hirschorn Syndrome will be in need of a kidney transplant in approximately a year.
She is being treated at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, which is one of the top children's hospitals in the country.
Her parents have a bad experience with one of the doctors and a social worker, which is documented here, blogged by the mother:
http://www.wolfhirschhorn.org/2012/01/amelia/brick-walls/
Long story short, the doctor says a mentally retarded child does not qualify for a kidney transplant even if it comes from the family. It mainly stems from quality of care, especially after the parents die (if she survives that long)
Now all shit breaks loose and the hospital is in a PR nightmare.
The hospital's response is as follows:
We hear you.
We feel and understand your frustration, but we are unable to comment publicly on individual cases.
Each child is unique, and our goal is always to provide the best possible medical care for each individual patient.
Please know that CHOP strives to partner with families and make appropriate decisions based on input from many sources, none more important than the patient’s family.
Anything less would be completely inconsistent with the values we work to uphold every day.
We are also taking action to review all existing policies to make sure that they reflect the core values we live by, including our deep commitment to not discriminate in any way.
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia is an institution. But more important, we are a team of men and women whose life’s work and greatest passion are the care of all sick children and the support of their families. To be entrusted with the care of these children is a privilege, one we take with the utmost seriousness.
Personally, this is what I'm seeing:
1) The mother wrote that blog post with every intention to publicly blackmail CHOP into giving the child the transplant. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind, with the way it's written.
2) As a parent, if one hospital is not giving me the quality of service, then I would go to a different hospital.
3) Personally, I think the mother is handling this extremely badly and I think the blog is wildly exaggerated to try and get a response from the soccer mom crowd.
Thoughts?