View Full Version : Star trek question
CYYYFYYY
02-14-2002, 07:23 PM
How many tons would you venture to say Data can
lift????????????
David the Franchize
Everyone Loves CYYYFYYY
Tall_James
02-14-2002, 07:31 PM
That is highly illogical.
<img src=http://users.rcn.com/jamespatton/tall%20james%20sig%20copy.jpg>
Dodging low-flying aircraft since 1977.
Tall_James
02-14-2002, 07:31 PM
That is highly illogical.
<img src=http://users.rcn.com/jamespatton/tall%20james%20sig%20copy.jpg>
Dodging low-flying aircraft since 1977.
Tall_James
02-14-2002, 07:31 PM
A double post of a bad joke.
I suck.
<img src=http://users.rcn.com/jamespatton/tall%20james%20sig%20copy.jpg>
Dodging low-flying aircraft since 1977.
CovDiesel
02-14-2002, 07:50 PM
I would have to say that the obvious answer is that star trek sucks.
<IMG SRC="http://members.aol.com/dxixrxt/covpigs.jpg">
DarkHippie
02-14-2002, 07:53 PM
probably not as many as you might think. He was not created to be a tool, but to be a living being. My guess would be around 10. and yes, i am a geek
<IMG SRC=http://diskeater.homestead.com/files/flagu.gif>
<i>support your local 420: union of brotherhood</i>
CYYYFYYY
02-14-2002, 07:57 PM
My guess is 8 tons.............
David the Franchize
Everyone Loves CYYYFYYY
Sheeplovr
02-15-2002, 04:59 AM
hmmmmm i think they went over this in an episode
but id say just one ton
are u talking free lifting or like benching
number 333 its the way to be
http://members.hometown.aol.com/_ht_a/walrus701/images/breadsig.jpg
POWER AND CHAOS
furie
02-15-2002, 05:32 AM
his bio on startrek.com says nothing about his strength.
8 tons seems a bit too much.
1 ton sounds better
that's a metric ton since it's in the future.
<img src="http://tseery.homestead.com/files/surfer.jpg" width=300 height=100 >
Thanks WWFallon!
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.