View Full Version : Kim Jong Il & Albright campaign ad
furie
10-11-2006, 08:17 AM
<a target='blank' href=http://www.drudgereport.com/flashma.htm>not that i'm in the habit of reading Drudge. I got this off of another board. </a>
I always liked Zucker's stuff
When I first saw that I thought it had to be some kind of satire. I shouldnt' have knowing the director and every piece of crap he's made since the Naked Gun.<br />
overyoo
10-11-2006, 12:27 PM
you all would be laughing your asses off if it was making fun off The Republicans and Bush.
<p> </p><strong>overyoo</strong> wrote:<br />you all would be laughing your asses off if it was making fun off The Republicans and Bush.<p> </p><p> </p><p>You don't seem to get it. First of all, I'm the only one voicing displeasure here, so its just me and not "you all". Second, at first I thought that was a satire of all the over the top national security ads Republicans put out and I still thought it was awful. David Zucker still hasn't learned that making Airplane! over and over again stopped being funny after the first Naked Gun.<br /></p>
Doctor Z
10-11-2006, 07:48 PM
The same way I don't wanna hear political rhetoric from Hollywood democrats, I also don't wanna hear political rhetoric from Hollywood republicans. Stick to making movies and shut your rich mouths.
furie
10-11-2006, 08:05 PM
<strong>HBox</strong> wrote:<br><p> </p><strong>overyoo</strong> wrote:<br />you all would be laughing your asses off if it was making fun off The Republicans and Bush.<p> </p><p> </p><p>You don't seem to get it. First of all, I'm the only one voicing displeasure here, so its just me and not "you all". Second, at first I thought that was a satire of all the over the top national security ads Republicans put out and I still thought it was awful. David Zucker still hasn't learned that making Airplane! over and over again stopped being funny after the first Naked Gun.<br /></p><p></p>
The Naked Gun 2 1/2 was funny.
mikeyboy
10-11-2006, 08:07 PM
<strong>furie</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>HBox</strong> wrote:<br /><p> </p><strong>overyoo</strong> wrote:<br />you all would be laughing your asses off if it was making fun off The Republicans and Bush. <p> </p><p> </p><p><font color="#000080"><font size="2">You don't seem to get it. First of all, I'm the only one voicing displeasure here, so its just me and not "you all". Second, at first I thought that was a satire of all the over the top national security ads Republicans put out and I still thought it was awful. David Zucker still hasn't learned that making Airplane! over and over again stopped being funny after the first Naked Gun.</font></font><br /></p><p> </p>The Naked Gun 2 1/2 was funny. <p>Eh. There was some serious deterioration in that franchise with each film.</p>
johnniewalker
10-11-2006, 08:17 PM
I loved Naked Gun 33 1/3 when it came up, but I was 11 when I saw it.<br />
mikeyboy
10-11-2006, 08:22 PM
<strong>johnniewalker</strong> wrote:<br />I loved Naked Gun 33 1/3 when it came up, but I was 11 when I saw it.<br /><p>Well, I thought "Bad News Bears Go To Japan" was the greatest movie ever when I was 9. We all have our crosses to bear.</p>
<p> </p><strong>furie</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>HBox</strong> wrote:<br /><p> </p><strong>overyoo</strong> wrote:<br />you all would be laughing your asses off if it was making fun off The Republicans and Bush.<p> </p><p> </p><p><font color="Navy"><font size="2">You don't seem to get it. First of all, I'm the only one voicing displeasure here, so its just me and not "you all". Second, at first I thought that was a satire of all the over the top national security ads Republicans put out and I still thought it was awful. David Zucker still hasn't learned that making Airplane! over and over again stopped being funny after the first Naked Gun.</font></font><br /></p><p> </p>
The Naked Gun 2 1/2 was funny.<p> </p><p> </p><p>OK, if that was the on with Goulet I'll agree. The other one was completely awful.<br /></p>
spoon
10-11-2006, 10:59 PM
Little help here as I can't get the video to play from the link. Any others?
furie
10-13-2006, 01:16 PM
<strong>HBox</strong> wrote:<br><p> </p><strong>furie</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>HBox</strong> wrote:<br /><p> </p><strong>overyoo</strong> wrote:<br />you all would be laughing your asses off if it was making fun off The Republicans and Bush.<p> </p><p> </p><p><font color="Navy"><font size="2">You don't seem to get it. First of all, I'm the only one voicing displeasure here, so its just me and not "you all". Second, at first I thought that was a satire of all the over the top national security ads Republicans put out and I still thought it was awful. David Zucker still hasn't learned that making Airplane! over and over again stopped being funny after the first Naked Gun.</font></font><br /></p><p> </p>
The Naked Gun 2 1/2 was funny.<p> </p><p> </p><p>OK, if that was the on with Goulet I'll agree. The other one was completely awful.<br /></p><p></p>
yes that's the one. 33 1/3 was the truly aweful movie. killed everyones careers.
furie
10-13-2006, 01:19 PM
<a target='blank' href=http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52405>YouTube blocked video mocking Clinton administration
Limits imposed on access to clip critical of Albright-run North Korea policy</a>
hmm
overyoo
10-13-2006, 02:02 PM
<strong>furie</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>HBox</strong> wrote:<br /><p> </p><strong>furie</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>HBox</strong> wrote:<br /><p> </p><strong>overyoo</strong> wrote:<br />you all would be laughing your asses off if it was making fun off The Republicans and Bush. <p> </p><p> </p><p><font color="#000080"><font size="2">You don't seem to get it. First of all, I'm the only one voicing displeasure here, so its just me and not "you all". Second, at first I thought that was a satire of all the over the top national security ads Republicans put out and I still thought it was awful. David Zucker still hasn't learned that making Airplane! over and over again stopped being funny after the first Naked Gun.</font></font><br /></p><p> </p>The Naked Gun 2 1/2 was funny. <p> </p><p> </p><p><font color="#000080"><font size="2">OK, if that was the on with Goulet I'll agree. The other one was completely awful.</font></font><br /></p><p> </p>yes that's the one. 33 1/3 was the truly aweful movie. killed everyones careers. <p>i agree ever since then i have not seen O.J. Simpson in a movie...Hmm</p>
Yerdaddy
10-14-2006, 02:58 AM
<p>Zucker's coming just a bit to late to the born-again conservative blow-hard cash cow. It worked for Christopher Hitchens and, briefly, for Dennis Miller. OK, maybe not so much for Miller. But they converted after 9-11 and before the right admitted that Iraq was a failure. But now that the right has either got quiet about the issues they've proved to stink at - like making wars and providing moral leadership - or fallen back on the "both sides stink" mantra, you can't come on all strong with the "Democrats did it!" horseshit and expect to cash in. Republicans are on the defensive. They need to distance themselves from some of the crazy-talk that would have been all-good a couple years ago and start painting themselves as the old sensible guardians of mainstream American values. </p><p>Nice try Zucker. Looks like you picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue.</p>
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.