View Full Version : Time to Kick Bruno to the Kirby.
ShowerBench
03-14-2007, 03:24 PM
<p>It's clear <font size="2">Bruno Kirby</font> is ruining the GAP project for Paulo and for Ron and Fez.</p><p>Obviously his primary objective now is to use the film as a vehicle for securing chicks for himself. He's actually become an embarrassment to Paulo and the project, something no one would have ever thought was possible. Did you hear that call today? The guy is a complete disaster and a liability.</p><p>He's been taking advantage of the fact that Paulo is having a hard time keeping it together with the film while simultaneously trying to bring back the magic with GailO.</p><p>Maybe it's not too late to turn GAP over to the Critter. </p><p>Who knows what the solution is? But the problem, the weak link, the blight on GAP and the Ron and Fez Show is obvious: </p><p><font size="5">BRUNO KIRBY.</font></p><p> </p>
Bellyfullasnot
03-14-2007, 03:30 PM
Thread title..very funny.
<p>Thread title of the year so far. Congrats. </p><p>I didn't catch the disparaging remark Bruno Kirby threw out, but it really pissed Ron off. </p><p> </p>
Servo
03-14-2007, 03:58 PM
<strong>Bellyfullasnot</strong> wrote:<br />Thread title..very funny. <p>It needs a "geh geh geh!" at the end.</p>
johnniewalker
03-14-2007, 04:09 PM
<strong>Gvac</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Thread title of the year so far. Congrats. </p><p>I didn't catch the disparaging remark Bruno Kirby threw out, but it really pissed Ron off. </p><p> </p><p> I don't think anyone caught what he was saying.</p>
led37zep
03-14-2007, 04:12 PM
<strong>johnniewalker</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Gvac</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Thread title of the year so far. Congrats. </p><p>I didn't catch the disparaging remark Bruno Kirby threw out, but it really pissed Ron off. </p><p> </p><p> I don't think anyone caught what he was saying.</p><p> I did. He said it was Time to Kick Bruno to the Kirby...weren't you paying attention?</p>
KnoxHarrington
03-14-2007, 04:12 PM
I did agree with Ronnie's assertion that he seems to be wanting to turn this into some sort of XM 202 gag reel rather than an actual movie.
I mean, at this point, I don't think anyone doesn't think this movie won't be a piece of shit, but, dammit, I want it to be Paul O's piece of shit.
<strong>johnniewalker</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Gvac</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Thread title of the year so far. Congrats. </p><p>I didn't catch the disparaging remark Bruno Kirby threw out, but it really pissed Ron off. </p><p> I don't think anyone caught what he was saying.</p><p><font face="comic sans ms,sand" size="2">Some people heard enough to understand why Ron was pissed.</font></p>
Bellyfullasnot
03-14-2007, 04:18 PM
<strong>Tom Servo</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Bellyfullasnot</strong> wrote:<br />Thread title..very funny. <p>It needs a "geh geh geh!" at the end.</p><p>Does it??? o.k. Terrific.</p>
lleeder
03-14-2007, 04:18 PM
<img src="http://ishmaging.com/blog/images/kirby.jpg" border="0" width="400" height="289" />
Fez is riled up over this!
ShowerBench
03-15-2007, 10:09 AM
<strong>KnoxHarrington</strong> wrote:<br />I mean, at this point, I don't think anyone doesn't think this movie won't be a piece of shit, but, dammit, I want it to be Paul O's piece of shit. <p>That's the tragedy of it all.</p><p>Maybe someone who isn't an idiot like Bruno Kirby can pick up the ball and help PaulO realize his dream.</p>
ralphbxny
03-20-2007, 12:40 PM
Bruno is a douche! Point blank!
MellySmelly
03-20-2007, 12:52 PM
Tom, (Bruno Kirby) has worked his ass off on the Gap project. He has severe insomnia and occasionally takes sleeping pills to help him sleep after he's been awake for days. That is why he sounded like an ass on the air the other day. He is one of the few people that I can call and tell all of my bullshit too and I know that I can trust him not to tell everyone. He is one of my very best friends in the whole fucking world.
thepaulo
03-20-2007, 01:15 PM
<p>Bruno is a perfect gemtleman and a snazzy dresser...until he gets a hold of those sleeping pills.....</p><p>then watch out.....he's a regular dr jekyll and mr Heckyll</p>
RapistWit
03-20-2007, 02:39 PM
<strong>KnoxHarrington</strong> wrote:<br />I did agree with Ronnie's assertion that he seems to be wanting to turn this into some sort of XM 202 gag reel rather than an actual movie. I mean, at this point, I don't think anyone doesn't think this movie won't be a piece of shit, but, dammit, I want it to be Paul O's piece of shit. <p>The funniest thing about this is that when Paul O announced that he had a "big movie idea" last year Ron quickly quipped <strong>"Is there a part for Lenay?"</strong> </p>
ShowerBench
03-20-2007, 02:47 PM
<strong>MellySmelly</strong> wrote:<br />He is one of the few people that I can call and tell all of my bullshit too and I know that I can trust him not to tell everyone. He is one of my very best friends in the whole fucking world. <p>Yeah, Bruno's incoherent call the other day showed he can be trusted to keep it just between you, him, and the Ron and Fez's national XM listening audience.</p>
Photoshop Mike
03-20-2007, 07:57 PM
I've worked with Bruno very closley.. he's a great guy, he really had his hands full. I have helped out a bunch, Im IN the movie, worked on SFX and alot more.. all right next to Bruno. He has worked his ass off. I know its funny to BASH somone and TRY and put "someone else" in their place.. Trust me.. he was.. all in all, a better choice. He has done it all, NEVER overstepped Paul-O.. only helped him. This movie will be better due to the Paul-o, Bruno and us all having worked on it, love it or hate it.. it is what it is - Im just say'n
It was a very unprofessional appearance last week, and not for just the stuff that came out about co-opting the movie. Nevertheless, I will take the word of people who know the guy that he is a good guy, however it does have the appearance that there are a lot of people involved in <strong>gap</strong> that do not have Paul O's best interest at heart and really derailed what could have been a solid horror film project into some sort of personal jumping stroke piece for them. Completely unprofessional, imo.
<p>er</p>
<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by AKA on 3-21-07 @ 9:58 AM</span>
Don Stugots
03-21-2007, 06:05 AM
<strong>AKA</strong> wrote:<br /><p>er</p> <span class="post_edited">This message was edited by AKA on 3-21-07 @ 9:58 AM</span><p> i miss AKA.</p>
MadMatt
03-21-2007, 06:08 AM
<strong>AKA</strong> wrote:<br />It was a very unprofessional appearance last week, and not for just the stuff that came out about co-opting the movie. Nevertheless, I will take the word of people who know the guy that he is a good guy, however it does have the appearance that there are a lot of people involved in <strong>gap</strong> that do not have Paul O's best interest at heart and really derailed what could have been a solid horror film project into some sort of personal jumping stroke piece for them. Completely unprofessional, imo. <p>Very well put, but that is the problem with sharing your dream - other people come in to help, they start to take partial ownership of "the dream," but their personal vision is a little different. Then conflict ensues because everybody wants their own personal version of the dream to become reality.</p>
<hr color="cococo" align="left"></font><strong>MadMatt</strong> wrote:<br><strong>AKA</strong> wrote:<br />
<p>Very well put, but that is the problem with sharing your dream - other people come in to help, they˙start to take partial ownership of "the dream," but their personal vision is a little different.˙ Then conflict ensues because everybody wants their own personal version of the dream to become reality.</p><hr color="cococo" align="left"><p></p>
I've been on both sides of this situation and the director is the one whose vision should be up on the screen; he can collaborate, get advice, listen to other ideas and ways of making the process and final product work, but it must be his vision. The producer(s) should be there to make the director's life easier. The producer should not have a vision for the film as well, imo. There are plenty of directors or would-be directors who can put aside their idea of what makes a good movie to instead help make their director's guy's idea of a good movie take shape.
Look no further than the relationship of Kevin Smith and Scott Mosier - both wanted to be directors when they met; they had an agreement that whoever's script was bought first would be the one to direct first, and then they would swap out with the next film - problem was, Clerks blew up. Doesn't mean that Mosier's impact on Clerks wasn't huge - but he's making the impact as a producer. Not once did I ever hear a report that Mosier felt it necessary to add nudity to Clerks for foreign markets; when Kevin got his big break to debut the film in New York City back in 1993, he wasn't c-blocked by a producer who felt it necessary to film ancillary scenes at the last second.
Like I said in the earlier message, I'm reading and listening to this from the outside and may not have all the information, but it really does appear that Paul wasn't really allowed to make his film and at the very least forces outside of Paul may have really squandered a golden opportunity.
tomfrombrooklyn
03-21-2007, 02:11 PM
<p>Sorry this is going to be long, because I have been away taking care of a very sick friend, and haven't had time to get online. </p><p>Hello All, this is Bruno Curby, get the spelling right Shower Spooge, or the family of the real guy, might have a slight problem with you.</p><p>First, I admit, my call was totally inappropriate the other day, and apologize to all that were offended. It was an iside joke regarding someones Mom, who happened to be sitting beside me, laughing her ass off, because she has a sick sense of humor like myself. Anyone who has listened during this whole gap thing, is aware that I HATE being on air, it makes me nervous and Ron has commented on how he knows I hate my voice on air. However, it appears that taking XANAX before a national radio show, is not the most appropriate thing to do, and for that, I am totally embarrassed. However, ALOT of people have had melt downs on this and other comedy shows, sometimes things just go to far.</p><p>What I think is really funny, is that there have been only 2 threads ever started about me, and have both been negative, and both by Shower Scum. Who could this be now? For someone that just logged on here in January, he seems to know an awful lot about gap and Paul O and Gail O., Bitter Grapes perhaps, if not, then you you really don't know me Shower stain, and for some reason just like to be on the attack. How about having the guts to call in yourself, instead of hiding behind your 13" monitor and attack one person repeatedly. You must be very, very sad and lonely.</p><p>Now as for Mikey D and the bullshit he has put up with since my call. I approached him, because how could Paul O possibly do a movie and not have the voice of "showtime with the Paul O" in the movie. She doesen't play up XM or Paul O, she is acting in the movie and does a fucking great job. The same with Stalker Patty. Exept Patty wasn't supposed to talk about it on the air, it was supposed to be a goof for long time fans, not guys that just bought XM a year ago Shower boy, They dont' play themselves,they play characters and if Paul doesn't want to use the footage, I am behind him, it was an idea that was worked on, and IT WORKS. </p><p>Anyway,this is way to long, but I want to thank those that are supportive that actually know the guy that shower stoole is attacking. I don't hate you shower stain, but it seems obvious to everyone that you have an agenda against me. All I can ask all of you is, watch the movie, and then make your comments, as for me, no more XANAX. See ya buddays.</p>
ShowerBench
03-21-2007, 08:12 PM
<p>You sound just as bad online as on the radio.</p>
Bob Impact
03-21-2007, 08:41 PM
<strong>ShowerBench</strong> wrote:<br /><p>You sound just as bad online as on the radio.</p><p> You just got mocked out by a board character.</p><p>I'm not judging anyone, I'm just saying is all. </p>
Reephdweller
03-21-2007, 08:42 PM
<strong>Gvac</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Thread title of the year so far. Congrats. </p><p>I didn't catch the disparaging remark Bruno Kirby threw out, but it really pissed Ron off. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>I agree completely!! </p>
Sheeplovr
03-21-2007, 08:42 PM
<p>he just may be the father of mellys baby </p><p>or is it paul</p><p>we dont know yet </p>
BoondockSaint
03-21-2007, 08:47 PM
<strong>tomfrombrooklyn</strong> wrote:<br /><p> </p><p>Now as for Mikey D and the bullshit he has put up with since my call. I approached him, because how could Paul O possibly do a movie and not have the voice of "showtime with the Paul O" in the movie. She doesen't play up XM or Paul O, she is acting in the movie and does a fucking great job. The same with Stalker Patty. Exept Patty wasn't supposed to talk about it on the air, it was supposed to be a goof for long time fans, not guys that just bought XM a year ago Shower boy, They dont' play themselves,they play characters and if Paul doesn't want to use the footage, I am behind him, it was an idea that was worked on, and IT WORKS. </p><p>See, if you really believe that, I am amazed.</p>
tomfrombrooklyn
03-21-2007, 10:14 PM
<p>I have gotten 23 emails from people telling me that shower stoole is really a guy name schotch shitter that wanted to be in the movie business so bad, but his big fat fucking ass couldn't fit in the fucking directors chairs that he bought for a low budget movie. I don't know that that is true, but people from the set, that can also tell who is who on message boards, tell me so. </p><p>If thats the case though, its cool, this is all for fun and the movie footage from last week is really very good. So everyone, just wait and see and don't listen to someone that pretends to not know me. </p><p>see ya buddays </p><p> </p>
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.