You must set the ad_network_ads.txt file to be writable (check file name as well).
People are suck sick fucks [Archive] - RonFez.net Messageboard

PDA

View Full Version : People are suck sick fucks


ryno1974
10-28-2007, 12:06 PM
I am starting to hate the world more and more. Every time I start to lessen my disdain for humanity, I run into another gem that makes me ashamed of being a human.

http://www.snuffx.com/puppy-killers.htm

Then there is always this gem:

http://www.consumptionjunction.com/details/6334/0/Blankman/Fuck-Puke-Laugh-Extreme/Pictures/

Now since I am going to sites like Consumption Junction I cant say too much, but still - WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE? Who the fuck would get off on seeing this stuff? The PAC people will probably want to bun my house down for sayng it, but these are just 2 small examples of why freedom of speech is such a dangerous thing.

The two most basic things in human nature should be to protect children, and to protect those who cant protect themselves (animals). It sems that these 2 things are so fucking lost to most of the degenerates out there that I dont know if there is any fixing humanity.

For anyone who has ever suffered the tragedy of watching a child die a "humour" pic of an intentionally killed baby is not funny. For anyone who has ever cared for a sick pet in the middle of night not knowing if they were going to live or not, a pic of a puppy killed for fun in not funny.

Aw fuck it, I'm sure everyone will just shit on these thoughts anyway.

The world is now officially 9/10ths of the way to hell in a hand cart.

TheMojoPin
10-28-2007, 12:09 PM
Aw fuck it, I'm sure everyone will just shit on these thoughts anyway.

Dude, this board is riddled with threads of people going nuts over stories of animal cruelty.

Just a heads up to people who reply in this thread...please note the forum and keep it civil.

TheMojoPin
10-28-2007, 12:12 PM
The PAC people will probably want to bun my house down for sayng it, but these are just 2 small examples of why freedom of speech is such a dangerous thing.

What does this have to do with "freedom of speech?" The government isn't protecting these people's non-existent rights to harm animals. These are people misusing the internet or being exposed by it. What does this have to do with censorship or freedom of speech?

ryno1974
10-28-2007, 12:15 PM
I agree, it should have nothing to do with it, but whenever anyone talks about shutting something down (like a website with this kind of shit on it) the inevitable "slippery slope" discussion begins, and everyone gets worried about losing their rights to speak against the government, etc.

I hear you though, common sense tells you there is a line between what is free speech and what is unacceptable in civilized society.

TheMojoPin
10-28-2007, 12:30 PM
I agree, it should have nothing to do with it, but whenever anyone talks about shutting something down (like a website with this kind of shit on it) the inevitable "slippery slope" discussion begins, and everyone gets worried about losing their rights to speak against the government, etc.

I hear you though, common sense tells you there is a line between what is free speech and what is unacceptable in civilized society.

I think you're really stretching it here. The government doesn't need to step in at all in terms of limiting the content of the internet like you seem to be talking about. The hosts and ISP's and such are all privately owned and can decide what they want to host. Odds are if you report these sites they'll be shut down (though the first is attempting to bust those guys, not support them or killing puppies). People get these kinds of things taken care of all the time...it's private citizens dealing with other private citizens when they're seeing people engage in illegal activity. Killing or torturing animals is against the law...that's not an issue of censorship.

ChrisTheCop
10-28-2007, 12:35 PM
A) you dont have to go to consumption junction to see an aborted fetus. Its one of many places you can see something like that if your so inclined. I dont think the pic or site glorified abortions in any way. But then, I didnt exactly look that long. Its a pic of something that exists, and it may have been posted in fact to shock, as in anti-abortionism, i dunno.

B) The hanged puppy made me madder. Its not often you can look into the eyes of a serial killer, let alone 2, 10-20 years before their crimes.

scottinnj
10-28-2007, 01:13 PM
My two cents:

1. Mojo is right.

2. The two puppy-killers need to be shot.


That is all.

ryno1974
10-28-2007, 01:42 PM
Sorry guys, I think you took my comment the wrong way. I DO NOT want government stepping into these kind of things, I was just saying that people might take my comments that way.

I agree about the puppy killers, an eye for an eye really makes sense in this case. As for the abortion one, it is from a site that is mainly a humour/porn site. The pic was supposed to be funny, but was not. In fact if you go to CJ and search fr abortion you will unfortunately get a number of matches, all with witty tag lines. I am still a CJ fan, but I am saddened by people that think this is funny.

Thanks for listening

lleeder
10-28-2007, 03:25 PM
The PAC people will probably want to bun my house down for sayng it,


How do you bun down a house, anyway?

ChrisTheCop
10-28-2007, 03:31 PM
How do you bun down a house, anyway?

She knows.
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1398/1100287518_2f9fccc3ce_o.jpg

lleeder
10-28-2007, 05:40 PM
People are suck sick fucks

It took me a while to notice but somethings wrong with this title.

ryno1974
10-28-2007, 06:12 PM
OK, clearly more than anything else ryno needs to have his keyboard repaired.