View Full Version : Choke Up On The Bat
lleeder
06-17-2009, 07:57 PM
Hall's interaction with the girl progressed to inappropriate touching and him showing her how to perform oral sex,
Mel Hall gets 45 years. (http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i76hjSuax32nMrbm09sEjbJr-AEAD98SO1PG1)
burrben
06-17-2009, 07:59 PM
whys a baseball player coaching basketball?
lleeder
06-17-2009, 08:00 PM
whys a baseball player coaching basketball?
To fuck underage girls?
burrben
06-17-2009, 08:01 PM
To fuck underage girls?
touche
Evolved
06-17-2009, 08:16 PM
Story seems to lacking any real details. Was there zero evidence?
Pestz4Evah
06-17-2009, 10:57 PM
Jon Heyman from Sports Illustrated:
when i covered yanks in early '90s, hall was dating h.s. girl. prom pic was in yankee yearbook.
No1Throwdown
06-20-2009, 03:09 PM
according to Dave
:wallbash:
Its JUST statutory
if you remember thursdays? Ichi bon
Lady Resin
06-20-2009, 03:12 PM
wtf?:huh:
spankyfrank
06-20-2009, 03:12 PM
Possibly weirdest thread ever?
TomS59
06-20-2009, 03:13 PM
A twelve year old what exactly?
mikeyboy
06-20-2009, 03:15 PM
What the hell are you talking about?
spankyfrank
06-20-2009, 03:15 PM
Maybe its time to call the locksmith.....
disneyspy
06-20-2009, 03:15 PM
dont do it
drjoek
06-20-2009, 03:15 PM
In before the lock
SatCam
06-20-2009, 03:17 PM
why dont you have a seat right over there?
EliSnow
06-20-2009, 03:18 PM
He's referring to the part of thursday's show re: the former Yankee who was convicted for raping a 12 year old. ESD did make a bit of a distinction between a rape and statutory rape.
It maybe was worth a comment in a listening thread but not it's own thread.
STC-Dub
06-20-2009, 03:18 PM
No
MacVittie
06-20-2009, 03:24 PM
Yeah Dave brought up that it was just a statutory charge against Mel Hall. Like Ron said, maybe the guy is less of a creep if she's 17 1/2 and he's 48. But she was 12. I think anything below 15 should count as statutory rape as well as rape rape. I hope Mel does every minute of that 40 year sentence.
Serpico1103
06-20-2009, 03:28 PM
according to Dave
:wallbash:
Its JUST statutory
if you remember thursdays? Ichi bon
It is statutory. As Ron pointed out, we are not talking about a girl a week away from the age of consent, but closer to half a decade away.
Statutory rape is rape that was consensual, but the person lacked the "legal" capacity to give consent.
Obviously if a 21 year old has sex with a 16 year old the night before her 17th birthday, that is a different crime than if a guy holds a knife to a woman's throat and forcible rapes her.
But, yes, 12 is another story. All states are different. In NY, I think it is statutory is he is over 21 and she is under 17.
Reynolds
06-20-2009, 03:32 PM
Yeah Dave brought up that it was just a statutory charge against Mel Hall. Like Ron said, maybe the guy is less of a creep if she's 17 1/2 and he's 48. But she was 12. I think anything below 15 should count as statutory rape as well as rape rape. I hope Mel does every minute of that 40 year sentence.
What if a 14 year old girl rapes an elderly man?
lleeder
06-20-2009, 03:47 PM
Hey I demand this thread be merged with its original non shit stirring boring original (http://www.ronfez.net/forums/showthread.php?t=81549)
sailor
06-20-2009, 04:41 PM
In before the lock
i love how many people post this in threads that never get locked.
lleeder
06-20-2009, 04:45 PM
i love how many people post this in threads that never get locked.
I can't remember the last thread that got locked. CAN YOU?????
denko
06-20-2009, 04:48 PM
according to Dave
:wallbash:
Its JUST statutory
if you remember thursdays? Ichi bon
i think he meant there is a difference between him engaging in a sexual act with a minor that was willing, as opposed to maybe abducting her or it being done in a violent manner. as fucked up as it sounds there is a difference.
Possibly weirdest thread ever?
I'm surprised it took this long for pedophilia to reach this board...
drjoek
06-20-2009, 04:50 PM
i love how many people post this in threads that never get locked.
I always seem to pick the wrong thread to try that gimmick.
i think he meant there is a difference between him engaging in a sexual act with a minor that was willing, as opposed to maybe abducting her or it being done in a violent manner. as fucked up as it sounds there is a difference.
Actually, in legal terms, I don't think it's possible for it to be consensual with someone that young.
I think it's 'rape rape' no matter what, under a certain age, because they deem someone of that age not able to form a proper opinion.
I could be wrong about that, though.
Marc with a c
06-20-2009, 04:53 PM
i'd still prefer to have sex with twenty eight year olds.
lleeder
06-20-2009, 04:56 PM
If your 12, fuck as many 12 yr olds as you like.
denko
06-20-2009, 04:57 PM
Actually, in legal terms, I don't think it's possible for it to be consensual with someone that young.
I think it's 'rape rape' no matter what, under a certain age, because they deem someone of that age not able to form a proper opinion.
I could be wrong about that, though.
sounds about right.. and in the eyes of the law i'm sure there is little difference, and i'm not saying its ok, but say it came out it was all against her will and he forced it i would be calling for his head. i think thats one of the few cases decapitation is cool.
If your 12, fuck as many 12 yr olds as you like.
http://pdberger.com/images/graham11.jpg
Serpico1103
06-20-2009, 05:45 PM
Actually, in legal terms, I don't think it's possible for it to be consensual with someone that young.
I think it's 'rape rape' no matter what, under a certain age, because they deem someone of that age not able to form a proper opinion.
I could be wrong about that, though.
You are wrong.
That is why it is statutory rape and not rape. Different crimes. The law deems that even if a 16yo says "yes"- gives consent- that consent is not recognized.
It is a different crime than forcible rape.
In NY, I think I am right- It is illegal for anyone to have sex with anyone under 14, and it is illegal for anyone over 21 to have sex with someone under 17.
So, a 13yo is committing a crime by having sex with another 13yo. And a 22yo is committing a crime by having sex with a 16yo. But, a 20yo can have sex with a 15yo.
NewYorkDragons80
06-20-2009, 05:52 PM
If your 12, fuck as many 12 yr olds as you like.
I'm willing to force skilled 12 yr old boys into chastity in the name of closing loopholes for more predatory elements of society
ShowerBench
06-20-2009, 06:32 PM
A twelve year old what exactly?
Husky, I think. Which would make it 64 in human years. Then I guess it would be considered a cougar according to the contemporary parlance.
So to answer your question: cougar.
sailor
06-21-2009, 04:39 AM
i'd still prefer to have sex with twenty eight year olds.
you'd get awful tired.
Marc with a c
06-21-2009, 08:11 AM
you'd get awful tired.
probably, but i'd be in a ring and they would be coming in one per minute. i'm pretty sure I could get it on with at least twenty.
No1Throwdown
06-23-2009, 02:20 PM
Its rape rape
No 12yo girl comes up with the idea to force a dick in there
the gum joke was funny though
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.